FlyinPiker
Incon-fricking-spicuous
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2005
- Posts
- 348
Also, lets not forget the all-important Customer. Doesn't the Customer deserve more choices at both DCA and LGA ? With an effective competitor ? One who doesn't charge bag fees ?
And, remember ( for all you patriotic guys out there) ...it is competition that makes us better. The better the competition, the higher we raise our level of play. It is the American way. Americans LUV a good, strong, competitor...always have, always will.
Surely Delta and US Airways aren't afraid of a good, strong competitor ?
From the language written by the DOT/FAA this is not about deciding if a particular swap is " the absolute best" for the consumer. It's about "is the swap that is being proposed for tomorrow make things worse than they are today". I don't think that's the case when you look at all the details of the Airways/DAL transaction.
It really isn't the Govt imposing as much as it is Southwest Airlines and their crack legal team calling out this deal. How nice is it that Delta/US Airways get to decide who they are gonna compete against. Not only that, but, how nice that they never offered those slots to SWA.
How nice is it that the government wants to put these slots up for auction to a select number of carriers (not just anyone)? Will the winning bid be as high as it would be if anyone was allowed to bid? Is that fair to our shareholders, yada, yada, yada?
I'm just glad this is going to a judge...no more games.
If we lose we lose. But our objection is not a stretch by any means, don't see how the DOT can say the same.
This thread is exhausting. I'm retiring from it.
-Late.
Last edited: