Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Do's and Don'ts of Aerial Photography?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
FN FAL said:
No...just don't take the photographer on any flight where he/she would be sitting on the floor of the aircraft without the intention of parachuting and you'll be ok.

Seriously, you could rent the plane to take the photog up for a local flight...that's the same as charging for a "plane ride". I think that when you mentioned going to other airports, that's where I got confused, but I just went back and re-read your post.

I have done the local area photo shoots myself and we returned to the same airport we took off from. Unless Avbug has some case law to cite or other issues with it, I think that's totally within the realm of "commercial" flying.

However, if you're going to go to other airports with a photog, you should look into having them rent the plane and retaining you as separate transactions. Documentation will save your bacon and prevent anyone from becoming confused.
Does the 25 mile rule apply? Just curious..for me it wouldn't matter, since all the houses would be in my local area. And thanks to whoever mentioned that medical thing...I need to get my eyes up to snuff to get my 2nd/1st back...

I just want to be careful with this stuff, because we all know "commercial" aviation gets real ticky tacky...and I'd rather my 250 hour butt not get cited.
 
If you are going to be flying and taking pictures, just be careful! I spent 1 year working as an aerial photographer where I was both the pilot and the photographer. It was an awesome job where I learned a lot and gained some valuable experience flying all across Canada. I miss that job a lot!

I scared myself on a few occasions, and I admit, that I would often try to go the extra mile just to get a sweet picture of a property. All our operations were at 500-1000AGL, so there was little room for error. I will admit that I have also gotten into situations where the stall horn would come on while I was in a steep turn-- definetly something that will get your attention and scare you! As I gained more experience, I became more aware of my own limits too. There were a few instances where I turned down photo-shoots just because I wasn't comfortable with it anymore (cottage photography--- this was the most challenging, and it's where I stalled the plane at low altitude. Fortunately my boss was cool with it and I never accepted that type of work again, even though it had the highest pay). The weather was also a big factor. If the photographer is trying to pressure you into going but the weather is questionable, don't be afraid to say no. I've had to cancel several wedding contracts because of weather.

If you can get away with it, try to stay as high as possible. If you need to get low, then just be sure you have complete situational awareness of everything- power lines, towers, skydivers, restricted airspace, etc etc.
 
gkrangers, I'm not a pilot but I am a photographer. Not a lot of experience shooting commercially-saleable aerial photos but yet I've done some awesome stuff. In fact last week I was on the main page of airliners.net with a one-of-a-kind shot. I shoot Canon digital. if you need a photog let me know! for a commercial assignment or not, it would be great to get some commercial-type shots to make a portfolio with.

This is an intersting thread. I would like to expand into aerial photography as well, but I guess I'd have to rent the plane. I dont know how I'd find someone here in Wisconsin to fly it though.
 
Last edited:
Good money

I also shoot Canon digital, I made over $200.00 profit for 20 minutes worth of work last week. This is a great monthly gig that will bring in over $10,000 this year.
 
There's a little blurb about this in the "everything explained for the profesisonal pilot" book. BTW, mine came in last week and it is friggin AWESOME, I've got such a better grasp on some "iffy" subjects.

If you have a guy going with you to take pictures, it's not 135 unless you drop him off at another airport, thus delivering "persons or property" for hire.

Many people have inquired about whether what I do for a living requires a commercial certificate. It depends on who you talk to at the FSDO. We go, take pictures, and occasionally land for fuel or to take a piss. We come back with the exact same thing we left with, so is it incidental to the business? The only difference is film is "exposed" when we return.

And most "aerial photographers" around this area (central alabama) own their own aircraft, just like my company that has STCs for the camera holes.
 
navigator72 said:
I also shoot Canon digital, I made over $200.00 profit for 20 minutes worth of work last week. This is a great monthly gig that will bring in over $10,000 this year.

Ok, so now I have to ask: how does one get started in this (from the photographer's perspective)?
 
av8rbama said:
If you have a guy going with you to take pictures, it's not 135 unless you drop him off at another airport, thus delivering "persons or property" for hire.

Many people have inquired about whether what I do for a living requires a commercial certificate. It depends on who you talk to at the FSDO. We go, take pictures, and occasionally land for fuel or to take a piss. We come back with the exact same thing we left with, so is it incidental to the business? The only difference is film is "exposed" when we return.
HOWEVER...according to Donald P. Byrne, Acting Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations and Enforcement Division in 1990, landing for "physicological reasons" at an airport other than the origin/destination takes the flight out of the "aerial phtography" exception and places it under 135. (assuming that the pilot is "owned" by the same people who own the airplane, and the photographer is hiring them for the flight)


Fly safe!

David
 
So what is the going rate for this sort of thing? I would take a photog up with me and charge for the aircraft + me flying it. I wouldn't get involved with taking pictures and selling them.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top