C141FE:
>>>>"There is (sic) only a few FE's who wrote in here talking about the times, and there some who are not. Would you think that the FE's who fly know when they can count the FE time vs pilot time. "
I'm not sure what your talking about. If you're trying to suggest that I don't know what I'm talking about because I'm not a flight engineer, you need to read my profile a little more closely. As far as I can tell, everyone who has posted to this thread is a flight engineer, so you can lay off the cheap-shots. Yes, flight engineer experience is experience, valuable experience. I would certainly find some way to include my f/e time in any application I filled out, but I would make sure I knew what the company I was applying to wanted (as you have done) That is not to say though, that f/e time is equal to pilot time, when taken in the context of pilot qualifications. In fact, the part 61 requirements for the ATP seem to indicate the the FAA considers f/e experience to be about one third as valuable as pilot time, for purposes of pilot qualifications. I think we can all agree that if you go to FED-EX with 300 hours of pilot time and 10,000 hours of FE time, you won't stand much of a chance of getting hired.
TDvalve:
Sorry if I rubbed you the wrong way. Let's both lay off the sarcasm, OK?
>>>>"Don't know about your FAR 1, but mine says flight time starts when an airplane moves under it's own power for the purpose of flight and stops wnen it comes to rest. It doesn't mention anything about a pilot."
I can't comment on what is printed in your copy of the regulations, as I don't your copy in front of me. I do know that my copy of the regulations, a 2002 edition published by ASA, clearly states that flight time means pilot time, just like I posted in my previous post. Just to make sure that ASA hadn't screwed up, I checked the copy of the Code of Federal Regulations which the US government makes available on the internet. CFR Title 14, Part 1 says:
Flight time means:
(1) Pilot time that commences when an aircraft moves under its own power for the purpose of flight and ends when the aircraft comes to rest after landing; or
(2) For a glider without self-launch capability, pilot time that commences when the glider is towed for the purpose of flight and ends when the glider
comes to rest after landing.
Maybe your copy says something different, I don't know, maybe it says the same thing and you just didn't read it carefully, or you remember incorrectly. Seriously, and I'm not trying to antagonize you, pull it out and read it ... what does it say?
>>>>Just because Southwest won't give credit for FE flight time doesn't mean it 's nonexistant(sic).
Yes, I agree. That was my point and you seem to have missed it. C141FE referred to the hiring practices of Fed-ex and ACA, as though they had relevance to the question. They don't, no more than Southwest's policies do. The Human resources policies of ACA, Fed-ex, and Southwest are relevant only to hiring at ACA, Fed-ex, and Southwest, respectively.
>>>>When you're asked "How much time do ya' have", it's not a simple question.
Yes, I agree. First you have to determine who's asking and what do *they* mean. In this case, the question can only be answered by consulting whomever established those requirements, apparently the insurance company. He's got enough time for the FAA requirements, so the FAA's opinion on f/e time is irrelevant, and he doesn't fly for ACA, Fed-ex, or Southwest, so their opinions are irrelevant.
As for Part 63, yes, I've read it too. Notice that that they specify "flight time as a flight engineer", which isn't going to have much relevance for Hmmmm's airline's insurance underwriter. I don't think we are going to find printed anywhere in the regulations "Insurance companies underwriting airlines certificated under Part 121 of this title shall include flight engineer time to meet their minimum experience requirements for pilot in command", or words to that effect. That seems to be what Hmmmm is looking for, and it just doesn't exist. He has to ask the insurance carrier, and accept their answer. If the answer isn't in his favor, FAR definitions, or the HR policies of other companes aren't going change that. I think that we've all been in aviation long enough to know that it's really the insurance companies who are calling the shots.
Regards