Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DME arcs and 3:1

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
And you would need to know this in the real world because???

Not knowing this is what created the Helena debacle for PCL a few years ago. HLN doesn't have radar coverage and the northern arc is not on the FMS so folks had to shoot this arc on green needles. Lack of very basic instrument knowledge like this almost created two real world holes on the ground.
Don't loose your basic instrument skills folks, never know when you will need them in the real world:rolleyes:
 
Not knowing this is what created the Helena debacle for PCL a few years ago. HLN doesn't have radar coverage and the northern arc is not on the FMS so folks had to shoot this arc on green needles. Lack of very basic instrument knowledge like this almost created two real world holes on the ground.
Don't loose your basic instrument skills folks, never know when you will need them in the real world:rolleyes:

Flying an arc and knowing how long it is are two seperate things.

But to answer the question about FAF and FAP, the fix is noted by the 'x' or whatever it's called on the plate and applies to nonprecision approaches. FAP is whenever you're established inbound within the required distance on a terminal VOR/NDB approach. It also marks the beginning of the final approach segment on an ILS. It's where the lowest glide slope intercept altitude and the glideslope intercept, not the same as the 'x' as that applies to the localizer. In other words, if you're established inbound on a terminal approach, you've intercepted the glideslope at the lowest published altitude or passing an 'x' on any nonprecision approach and the weather goest to crap you can still continue.
 
60/Distance from station = Radials per NM. So on a 10 DME you will travel 6 radials per mile. Multiply that by your turn radius and you get a lead radial for a 90 degree intercept. 1/2 of that for a 60 degree and 1/3 for a 45 degree intercept.

Real world - Most likely never. Flying the Tweet with avionics from 1955 I'll take every bit of help I can get!
 
Knowing how long you will be on the arc (IE knowing how long it is)to determine time available for step down to the procedure altitude is very much part of flying the arc.

You are so correct. But, then again, in the age of FMS and reset jets, airmanship is, unfortunately, becoming a lost art. I have a rant about this entitled "RJs hitting mountains, lakes, and cornfields at alarming rates in about 3 years" but nobody seems to want to listen to me........
 
Very simply, at 60 miles from the dme fix, each degree is equal to 1 mile. Using simple ratios, at 30 miles, each degree is equal to .5 miles. At 15 miles, each degree is worth .25 miles. Use these ballparks and you should be alright. The FAA likes to ask these questions, but they aren't known for asking the distance on a 17 mile dme arc. It should be a nice round number which is divisible by 60. Keep in mind, they are still FAA. They aren't geniouses by anybody's account!
 
groundspeed x descent angle x 1.77 will give you the exact descent rate in fpm. Just remember your GS will change in a long descent as your TAS and winds change in the descent.
 
Not knowing this is what created the Helena debacle for PCL a few years ago. HLN doesn't have radar coverage and the northern arc is not on the FMS so folks had to shoot this arc on green needles. Lack of very basic instrument knowledge like this almost created two real world holes on the ground.
Don't loose your basic instrument skills folks, never know when you will need them in the real world:rolleyes:

How about the fact they were flying them at over 300 knts. 250 above 10 right. Even if you are on a segment of the approach.
 
Real world or not, every instrument pilot, CFII and especially those who fly professionally in FMS equiped aircraft should be able to do these basic calculations. It's part of being a competent professional pilot. Don't skip steps in learning your trade whether you'll utilize them or not.
 
......

And you would need to know this in the real world because???


Go check out the government/DOD plate for Delhi, India (VIDP), ILS/DME or VOR/DME ARC RWY 28.

What was that about dme arcs?.....once you get outside the lower 48, you might have to fly one (not nessecarily in Delhi, but the plate looks intimidating nevertheless).
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top