Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMHO, it's not rocket surgery. Those center radar screens aren't HDTVs. If you feel like you're saving fuel going direct to a 5 mile final fix, go for it; I don't THINK Center will care. It's our job to navigate. Their job is to maintain seperation. To that end, if they need you to go to the VOR to maintain sequence or seperation, they'll make sure you know.
Flame away.
IMHO, it's not rocket surgery. Those center radar screens aren't HDTVs. If you feel like you're saving fuel going direct to a 5 mile final fix, go for it; I don't THINK Center will care. It's our job to navigate. Their job is to maintain seperation. To that end, if they need you to go to the VOR to maintain sequence or seperation, they'll make sure you know.
Flame away.
I believe they changed to different identifiers all the vor/airport pairs that are more than 5nm apart. There are still a large number that are within 5 miles and have the same identifiers. ICT, SGF TUL MGM LIT SPA off the top off my head. If a center controller clears you direct it is your choice. When you check in with approach you might want to clarify it.
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=102260&page=2
The POI in the jumpseat answer is "Direct always to the Navaid/Waypoint unless specifically stated as to the airport."
what we do in real-world ops is another story, yes, I know.
Funny how you ask two different feds the same questions and get two different answers. Asked the ZW POI this exact question and he said that when the ATC types want you to go to the VOR they will say "Direct XXX VOR".
Just for a 2nd opinion, I asked a friend of mine who works a TRACON and he agreed.
Take it for what it's worth.............