1900laker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2001
- Posts
- 117
Skeezer,
I think up stuff like that all the time, but then remember the FAR catchall about operating reckless and dangerously, which they can pretty much hit anything with. In a court of law, that is the one they would nail him with because it is so ambiguous, it covers EVERYTHING that is done with stupidity that the other regs miss. But if the FAA is out to get you for no good reason, this is also the reg they like to use.
I think that guy maybe up for a Darwin Award honorable mention (U know, since he managed to live through it and all).
I think up stuff like that all the time, but then remember the FAR catchall about operating reckless and dangerously, which they can pretty much hit anything with. In a court of law, that is the one they would nail him with because it is so ambiguous, it covers EVERYTHING that is done with stupidity that the other regs miss. But if the FAA is out to get you for no good reason, this is also the reg they like to use.
I think that guy maybe up for a Darwin Award honorable mention (U know, since he managed to live through it and all).