~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Jeeeesssh! Wrong, wrong wrong and WRONG!General Lee said:Fins,
2. They fought for scope that actually saved many many jobs after 9-11. If it were up to Fred Reid---we would have had 1000 RJs by now--large and small---and many more would have been out of work. That scope restriction kept people at mainline.
If your MEC had not killed the PID, every one of those RJ's would have been flown by Delta pilots, on the Delta seniority list and the company could deploy the best airplane for making a profit on the route where it was needed.
As you point out :
And Grinstein is correct Delta needs bigger airplanes, but your scope gives them a huge financial incentive to run gass guzzling ( for their capacity ) RJ's.General Lee said:As far as what will happen with future 100 seaters (even though Grinstein didn't put much faith in them---stating instead the need for more larger aircraft to bring down the CASM)---
When will those morons that you elect realize that scope that controls pilots is more effective, as well as better for the company, than scope that controls airplanes. There is no economic, moral, or legal justification for the scope policies of your MEC. Your MEC's failed policies only serve to (1) continue ALPA apartied, so your members may feel "superior" and (2) provide a route to Delta flying for military pilots ( who I guess are going to get PIC at Airtran before Delta ever hires them).
Remember - one list would have been perfect scope. All Delta flying done by Delta pilots. Not a single Delta pilot job would have been lost. So no, I don't hate who your MEC is, but I despise what they have done to a union and a company that I am a part of.
~~~^~~~
Does TK still feel ALPA Apartied is the right way to go?