Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
satpak77 said:OK, plain English -
what is going to happen at Delta?
ATR-DRIVR said:They'll either strike or not.
At first I thought they'd roll over like everyone before them. After speaking honestly to a number of buddies at DAL, I'm convinced that a significant portion will vote for a strike. In many cases, the abolishment of a contract combined with the very significant pay cuts has reduced the wage rate to the "tipping point" (i.e., the point at which many would rather start over in another occupation and see DAL fold).On Your Six said:IF the contract is voided, the pilots will strike. You can bank on that.
satpak77 said:OK, plain English -
what is going to happen at Delta?
accinelli said:Pilots are going to talk tough, threaten strike then settle on a TA.
satpak77 said:OK, plain English -
what is going to happen at Delta?
GogglesPisano said:What are the sticking points in negotiations and how far apart are they?
Good luck DAL pilots.
ekuflyer said:I don't think they should have to give anymore, however I'm afraid that the Judge will make a ruling that the pilots can not walk. If they do then they could be individually held in contempt of the court.
Has DALPA thought about this scenario?
Archie Bunker said:Would we still fall under the laws of the Railway Labor Act? I don't know, because this could be precedence setting law we're talking about here. If the company were to somehow get an injunction to stop the pilots from walking, what would happen if all the pilots put in a letter of resignation right before the strike were to begin? Interesting stuff........
Champ42272 said:Personally, I haven't seen one word anywhere contemplating what would happen if the pilots actually WON the decision board verdict.
Champ42272 said:Since DALPA got to pick two of the judges and the company only one, combined with the fact that things are getting better....
Champ42272 said:That may be naive, but I would love to see Jerry's face if the decision didn't go his way.
FDJ2 said:Not as precedence setting as you might think. In the context of contract rejections, which have happened in the past, including airline contracts, the right to strike has always been upheld. Besides, the 2nd circuit has already stated that they don't have jurisdiction to enjoin a strike at DAL, that probably has something to do with the Norris-Laguardia Act which specifically prohibiting federal courts from enjoining a strike.
IF that were to happen, do you think the sheriff will be out hauling pilots back to work in the back of police cruisers? The corporations practically own the government, but it's still not that bad . . . yet.ekuflyer said:I don't think they should have to give anymore, however I'm afraid that the Judge will make a ruling that the pilots can not walk. If they do then they could be individually held in contempt of the court.
Has DALPA thought about this scenario?
Archie Bunker said:A TA would be nice, however there's only one small problem......nobody is negotiating. Add to that the fact that most pilots I know are not willing to give anymore. The last TA only passed by a margin of 58% to 42%. I honestly don't think that anything on the table right now would pass muster with a majority of the pilots. I mean really...if the numbskulls running our company can't turn a profit with 47% of our pay in their pockets, what good is 5 or 10% more going to do for them? What is the point?
In the meantime, the result of the strike vote will be made public on Tuesday, April 4th.......and the ruling by the 3 man arbitration panel concerning the abrogation of our contract should be announced no later than April 15th. If the panel voids our contract, our MEC Chairman said that we will strike, period. No contract=no work.
Interesting times lay ahead, no doubt.
accinelli said:Sure -- whatever gets you through the day. Meanwhile, I hope you have apps in with all the regionals, LUV and JBlu.
Archie Bunker said:Not exactly correct. The swing vote (Richard Bloch) is by no means in DALPA's pocket. This is the same arbitrator that voted against the furloughees in April 2002's force majeure hearings. .
Draginass said:What will happen? The same thing as US Air. The pilots will fold.
Draginass said:IF that were to happen, do you think the sheriff will be out hauling pilots back to work in the back of police cruisers? The corporations practically own the government, but it's still not that bad . . . yet.
michael707767 said:actually, I thought Blochs ruling on the force majeure furloughs was more on the union side than the company side. Remember, the company wanted then gone, period.
Archie Bunker said:If the Federal BK courts don't have the power to stop the pilots from walking, then who does? Do you think that "W" could get involved?
Draginass said:What will happen? The same thing as US Air. The pilots will fold.