Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta to look differnt in 1 year

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
General Lee said:
Inclusivescope,


I don't really want to get into this one again, but first of all--it wasn't for ME. Comair not allowing our furloughs to go over to the bottom of their list was A SLAP IN THE FACE to the furloughs. The ASA people were nice enough to allow it. I don't care who was at fault over there at Comair---management or whoever. Comair and ASA gained a lot by Delta parking a lot of planes--and only ASA realized this and offered to help the unfortunate people who couldn't help themselves and were thrown into a furlough situation. The same can be said about the Comair strike--when all ALPA people paid money--including me---to help the Comair pilots out during their time of need. Short and Simple--the COMAIR PILOTS DID NOT DO ENOUGH TO VOICE A STRONGER OPINON TO TRY TO GET THAT STUPID POLICY CHANGED. ASA proved they could do it---Comair did NOT. That is where you lose this argument---the ASA people (who are your brothers and sisters) helped our furloughs out. You are blaming one man (our MEC chair) for a supposed mistake--and that eventually affected hundreds of people. Nice. That really is comical. You can't see that actual people and families were affected here--just like during the Comair strike. Were you affected during that strike? Did you enjoy the $1000 or whatever you got a month from ALPA? How much have you given our furloughs when they needed your help? Answer that one please. (don't change the subject)

Bye Bye--General Lee

I'll answer that one General, I have done as much for your furloughs as I have for United's, USAir's, American's, CAL's and NWA's. Why should I do anything more for DAL furloughees than I should for the others? Your MEC wanted separate pilot groups - you now have separate pilot groups. If this "union" wants to just be a loose association of pilots who share a sh$%^& magazine and have a neat little pin, then it needs to accept the consequences of it's actions.
 
General Lee said:
Inclusivescope,


I don't really want to get into this one again, but first of all--it wasn't for ME. Comair not allowing our furloughs to go over to the bottom of their list was A SLAP IN THE FACE to the furloughs. The ASA people were nice enough to allow it. I don't care who was at fault over there at Comair---management or whoever. Comair and ASA gained a lot by Delta parking a lot of planes--and only ASA realized this and offered to help the unfortunate people who couldn't help themselves and were thrown into a furlough situation. The same can be said about the Comair strike--when all ALPA people paid money--including me---to help the Comair pilots out during their time of need. Short and Simple--the COMAIR PILOTS DID NOT DO ENOUGH TO VOICE A STRONGER OPINON TO TRY TO GET THAT STUPID POLICY CHANGED. ASA proved they could do it---Comair did NOT. That is where you lose this argument---the ASA people (who are your brothers and sisters) helped our furloughs out. You are blaming one man (our MEC chair) for a supposed mistake--and that eventually affected hundreds of people. Nice. That really is comical. You can't see that actual people and families were affected here--just like during the Comair strike. Were you affected during that strike? Did you enjoy the $1000 or whatever you got a month from ALPA? How much have you given our furloughs when they needed your help? Answer that one please. (don't change the subject)

Bye Bye--General Lee
Where is the data and references to support your argument on this one?

By your own admission you "don't care" who was at fault over Comair's hiring policy. But you blame the pilots. Real objective!

Where is the data or meeting minutes supporting your argument that our MECs wanted DOH integration when the proposal was made? Please don't regale us again with your story about the FA friend who was in the crew room either because that is anecdotal at best.

How is paying a strike assessment and "supporting" furloughs even remotely connected? If ALPA had a mechanism to pay a "furlough assessment" then we would all be paying it just like you did when Comair struck. To use your words if you feel so strongly that we all should: YOU ARE NOT DOING ENOUGH TO VOICE A STRONGER OPINION TO TRY TO GET THAT STUPID POLICY CHANGED!
 
Xreme-me,


I said in my statement that I didn't know who made the decision--and I keep hearing from everyone that it was Comair managment---not the pilots--who made the decision. Re-read my post please. But, I was mad that most of the pilots at Comair DID NOT CREATE A BIG ENOUGH STINK TO TRY TO CHANGE THE POLICY. The end result here was 1310 guys on the street (originally)---and no help from Comair. Let's get over the politics---look at the RESULTS. We, along with every other ALPA member---helped you during your strike--the best ability we could. Then a huge chunk of our people get furloughed and you expand like crazy---and only ASA comes through and helps the needy---while your people (managment--maybe your MEC--MAYBE) could have atleast helped--like ASA did. There was a precedent--ASA helped. Could our management have done something? Sure--maybe--they also could have stopped ASA.

So, we should have had something before 9-11 in the ALPA procedures to allow for an assesment if the "world comes to an end and terrorists bring down the trade centers with airplanes." Hmmm. Did you see 1300 plus furloughs ever coming to fruition at Delta? No, neither did I. It was terrible for many families--and you guys just watched when the ASA people actually helped. The offer would have been nice--but your MEC Chair wanted something in return. That aint nice--and caused many unfortunate families grief. Would you have given up your Delta seniority? I didn't think so. And, it would not have even bumped one guy at Comair--they would have gone to the bottom like at ASA. I don't remember ever cursing or saying anything but positive things when I wrote out a check each month in SUPPORT of your strike. I wanted you to win. Leo had other plans. We were your supporters---and after we took a hit after 9-11---your people didn't really help ours.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
Xreme-me,


I said in my statement that I didn't know who made the decision--and I keep hearing from everyone that it was Comair managment---not the pilots--who made the decision. Re-read my post please. But, I was mad that most of the pilots at Comair DID NOT CREATE A BIG ENOUGH STINK TO TRY TO CHANGE THE POLICY. The end result here was 1310 guys on the street (originally)---and no help from Comair. Let's get over the politics---look at the RESULTS. We, along with every other ALPA member---helped you during your strike--the best ability we could. Then a huge chunk of our people get furloughed and you expand like crazy---and only ASA comes through and helps the needy---while your people (managment--maybe your MEC--MAYBE) could have atleast helped--like ASA did. There was a precedent--ASA helped. Could our management have done something? Sure--maybe--they also could have stopped ASA.

So, we should have had something before 9-11 in the ALPA procedures to allow for an assesment if the "world comes to an end and terrorists bring down the trade centers with airplanes." Hmmm. Did you see 1300 plus furloughs ever coming to fruition at Delta? No, neither did I. It was terrible for many families--and you guys just watched when the ASA people actually helped. The offer would have been nice--but your MEC Chair wanted something in return. That aint nice--and caused many unfortunate families grief. Would you have given up your Delta seniority? I didn't think so. And, it would not have even bumped one guy at Comair--they would have gone to the bottom like at ASA. I don't remember ever cursing or saying anything but positive things when I wrote out a check each month in SUPPORT of your strike. I wanted you to win. Leo had other plans. We were your supporters---and after we took a hit after 9-11---your people didn't really help ours.

Bye Bye--General Lee
I'm getting all teary eyed over here private! Real touching story, but no answers to the questions asked.

Obviously you don't care as much as you would have us believe about those guys and their families or YOU WOULD BE CREATING A BIGGER STINK ABOUT IT AND GETTING THEM SOME RELIEF FROM THIS! That's the logic you use when you rail on the Conmair pilots isn't it?

Again, no connection between paying strike assessment dues and Comair pilots making the policy about seniority number resignation.

BTW I don't work at Comair!
 
X-ream-me,


Regardless of who you work for, that is how many Delta pilots---working and not working--feel. As far as creating a teary eyed story for you---you are not allowed to cry! You are an Army Ranger, right? Whatever.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
X-ream-me,


Regardless of who you work for, that is how many Delta pilots---working and not working--feel. As far as creating a teary eyed story for you---you are not allowed to cry! You are an Army Ranger, right? Whatever.

Bye Bye--General Lee
Whatever huh? You sound like my teenage daughter. That word is just filled with facts and references to support your position. Real compelling case you make!

Night night Susan!
 
Ream me,


You sound ridiculous. I feel sorry for your daughter---you are probably a really anal-retentive a$$hole father who likes to call her "private!" Boy, that must be fun having you as a terrorizing father! I thought you said "you don't always have to rebutt something." Whut whut? I am right again.

What does "whatever" mean? I means that you and what you say mean NOTHING to me. Why does she say it to you? Sounds like the same deal.

Night night Susan. I like that one. Is that what you say before you go to sleep? Susan is either your wife or the M-1 gun you sleep next to. Which is it?

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
You Got My Attention - Part 1 of 2

Vortilon,

Well sir, the questions I most wanted answered were those that came before the last one but I do understand if you don't have those answers. I presume therefore that your response was intended as an answer to the last of my questions.

I like much of your post and admire the obvious pride that you display in your current airline, Delta. It has been a fine airline for very many years with a unique culture of its own that gave its pilots many reasons to be proud. I would argue however that the rapid hiring that occurred during the 90's has in fact changed the culture of Delta Air Lines. "The old gray mare ain't what she used to be.."

As you express in your message, this unique "culture" is a phenomenon true of many "major" airlines. I can think of companies like Pan American, Trans World, United, Northwest, American, Eastern and others, but notably those -- the legacy carriers as we now call them. Some are no more than a memory and three of the others are now in serious trouble, from which I hope all will eventually recover. Each has a culture of its own and a proud history, which fosters pride in the pilot group. In most cases this is a "good" thing. We should nevertheless give some credit to the Biblical admonition, i.e., pride goeth before the fall.

While your post speaks well of Delta I cannot help but note that it is no less than and indictment of your former company. While I don't think you meant to disparage your peers at COEX, there is little doubt that you've done so. Based on your remarks the airline comes across as a hodgepodge of immature incompetents lacking both experience and purpose. Yet you call it a "decent regional", which leaves us only to imagine what the indecent regionals might be like or who they are.

I have no direct knowledge of what life was or is like at Continental Express so I cannot say that you are right or wrong in the comparisons you make between that company and your current employer. What I can and do say is that all regional airlines (just like all major airlines) are not cut from the same cloth. You appear to think that they are, especially in the light of the specific experiences you reference and your remark of "it will still be a step forward for pilots coming from regional./feeder/jet national/whatever carriers." You are painting with a very broad brush and I respectfully submit that you do not have enough background to go that far.

I'll use my own company as a reference and try to highlight some experiences which are quite different from yours. First of all your remarks assume that no regional has any "culture" of its own that might be desirable enough to consider it a "career job". Perhaps that is true of many and it is indeed something that I too have noticed. However, it is not true of all. The airline that I work for is called a "regional". Nevertheless, it does have a "culture" of its own. The presumption you make is not unusual in that there are few "major" airline pilots that I have met who are willing to believe that any "regional" could or for that matter should have any culture of its own, let alone one that might result in pride among its pilots. You are wrong about that. My little carrier has a culture and it has existed for some time. Granted its not 75 years, but only 1/3 + of that. Just the same it does exist. We do not identify ourselves as "express" or "connection" anything and never have. We have a name and an identity of our own, of which we are proud, and have been for some time. For many of us the loss of that identity resulting from our "acquisition" by Delta is not a source of joy.

Just as Delta's culture has changed due to its rather rapid expansion in the 90's and the influx of so many new people, ours is changing too, perhaps for different reasons. At Delta, I see the change as one of "generation". The "new breed" is quite different for the Delta gentlemen of yesterday. In my little company the growth has been so rapid that we have had little time to assist our new people in learning and embracing our culture. Additionally, the immigration from "foreign" pilot groups, many with the same mindset as yours, has not made the task an easy one. Once upon a time we were all Comair pilots. Today we find among us Eagle pilots, Midway pilots, USAir pilots, ACA pilots, TWA pilots to name just a few. It will take some time for all of those to become Comair pilots. Not much different from Delta, which still has Northeast pilots, Western pilots and Pan Am pilots. Some assimilate more readily; others think we are just like wherever they came from and have nothing worth assimilating. Additionally, our being owned and controlled by a "foreign" entity doesn't help any.

I am one of many who did not start life as a Comair pilot. My personal background in aviation is older than the airline itself but my tenure here has been long enough to permit me to voluntarily embrace the Comair culture and make it my own. Although you and others may think I'm nuts, "Delta Connection" is a term I'd just as soon forget and it would not occur to me to call myself a Delta pilot. I find nothing wrong or embarrassing about being a Comair pilot and if the people I carry don't know the name of my airline when they board, you can bet they do by the time they deplane. While I have nothing against the folks in Atlanta, my home is in Cincinnati. As I said in the beginning, Delta pilots have every reason to be proud of Delta. In my humble opinion Comair pilots have every reason to be proud of Comair and no reason at all to pretend otherwise.

You said you enjoyed (when you went to Delta) flying with captains that had all sorts of different experiences and felt that you learned a lot from them. I have no doubt that is true. Strangely, I felt the same about my time as a Comair FO, notwithstanding the fact that I had been a captain somewhere else many years before I even knew that Comair existed. I can only hope that as a Comair captain I have been able to share the diverse experience of my own background with younger Comair pilots that I am fortunate to fly with. I can assure you that those experiences (my own) are as diverse as those of most Delta pilots. Somehow that happened despite the fact that I've never been a Delta pilot. I am by no means unique, there are a great many of us at Comair who are not "flying their first jet", not limited to light aircraft experience, not limited to "regional" backgrounds, and did not come here with 500 hours. As but one example, Comair jets are actually the smallest jets I've ever flown. I assure you I am not alone in the ranks of CMR pilots. In the time I've been here I don't know of a single pilot hired with 500 hours of flight experience, although it is quite possible that did occur at some point before my tour began. We are not "generally the same age", although we are what I would consider a "young" pilot group. We do not all have "the same level of experience", did not go to the "same colleges", do not come from the same branch of the military, etc. I don't claim that we have the same diversity of experience as Delta, but for a little airline this is a pretty diverse group.

Being at a major was better because as a pilot you benefited from procedures and being developed for 70+ years. Most everything that was done had a reason it was done that way, and most things ran so much smoother than at my regional. They had a great emphasis on safety...it was truly imbedded into your brain. There was never a pressure to "be cool & laid back". You were expected to do a professional job all the time. It was really liberating. No cocky 25 year old attitudes to deal with. Things that would have labeled me as a "hard ass" or "nitpicker" or "uncool" at COEX were simply the way things were done at Delta. Of course you use the checklist for everything, Of COURSE you identify navaids, Of COURSE you had charts out even though its a glass airplane, of COURSE you try to nail the airspeeds. I never had someone say "I've flown this airplane for 7 years and I don't need a checklist" (got that from some 3-year RJ FOs at COEX). It was just a comfortable, professional atmosphere to work in with mutual respect between crewmembers.
Again, I have no idea what you did (do) at COEX but I have to tell you that I do not find any of the things you list above as being exclusive to "the way of life at Delta" (that you found different and exciting), strange or unusual. I acknowledge the occasional cocky attitude among younger pilots but in my experience, by the time someone makes Captain at Comair that has long since been squashed. In the early years there were some pretty rapid upgrades, several of which resulted in less than stellar performance, but for the best part that was overcome. We got rid of the chaff as soon as possible. Although you personally may not have come across anything less than perfection at Delta, I would venture a guess that's only because you haven't been there long enough. Although we would like to think so, none of us is perfect. With a little more time under your belt you too will discover that all airlines have pretty much the same percentage of dorks. I assure you Delta is no exception.
 
Last edited:
Part 2 of 2

The training was outstanding. Nobody at the training department was there to prove anything...they were there to help you get through the training and make sure you were prepared for the line. The training center itself was amazing with all the resources at your disposal 24-7. I never feared training, even while on probation.
What you find here to be exceptional, I find to be routine and not an exception. Again, I have no idea what goes on at COEX but you seem to be saying that it’s a sorry mess. Don't make the mistake of lumping everyone into that basket. The way you describe training at DAL is no different from what I know at CMR. Based on your remarks it is not Delta that I find to be the exception, it is COEX. IF it was what you say, and I emphasize the IF, it is not hard to see why you find Delta to be such an improvement. For the record I would add one thing. We at CMR did not learn how to run our training department from Delta. It was operated normally long before they bought us.

Plus lets not forget that flying bigger aircraft has its rewards. Generally, they are more capable operationally...not many headaches with weight restrictions, climb performance, range, etc.
I would agree that larger aircraft often do have more operational capability, but the "advantages" you mention often lead to pilot complacency. The small aircraft, for all the reasons you listed tend to be more demanding and require more attention on the part of pilots. This is not a setback but rather it improves your professional skills. For instance I got far better at approaches and landings at Comair than I ever was flying international and making one landing every 16 hours.

Things don't break as much because the company has mechanics with tons of experience. The radar works....which was a big plus over the ERJ! The dispatchers actually knew what they were doing. Delta has their own meteorologists at your disposal.
Again I know nothing of COEX, but the maintenance department at my airline is just as good as Deltas and the mechanics do not lack experience. The airplanes don't "break" any more than airplanes anywhere else and they are well maintained. Our radar does work.. We have no ERJs so I can't speak to their "problems" but I suspect, especially in the light of your comments that your radar didn't work because you didn't know how to use it. We don't have or own meteorologist, but the dispatchers do have a pretty good idea of what they're doing. Sometimes, like dispatchers everywhere, they think they're "in command" but real captains have little difficulty with that.

Its fun to have a big crew and get to know other crewmembers at the overnight.
Now that I can relate to!. There's nothing like having 3 up front and six or more in the back. However nowadays even the biggest airframes only have 2 up front and, if Delta is to be the standard, there is little advantage to having a cabin crew of a half-dozen grandmothers and 3 brand X. I may be up there in age, but I'm not into playing bridge or discussing my grandchildren on overnights, and the Lord knows I no longer need a "mother". I'm also not into AC/DC companions.

For pilots, everything related to day-to-day schedule was pretty computerized. Between checking your schedule on the computer and getting messages from scheduling over ACARs, you rarely spoke with an actual scheduler. Wanna drop a day off? Put in the request on the computer and check back in 12 hours. Wanna pick up a trip, do the same. The computer knew the contract and if it was permitted, viola....no asking for "favors" or dreading talking to a particular scheduler like I did at COEX.
Well you're the first pilot I've ever heard with a good word for crew scheduling. We've had our problems with scheduling and some of them were really big problems. Some real yo-yos ran and worked in that department. Most are gone now and it is much improved. Apart from that, the computer stuff is nothing new. We don't get messages from scheduling over ACARs, probably because we don't have ACARs, but candidly, that's a plus. The other stuff is nothing special and depends on your contract. Most major airlines have more mature contracts, which is why they have better scheduling rules. That's changing too. Today we have better rules than UAL. It is also more difficult to schedule short haul than a combined operation. From the sound of things that COEX operation must be in the dark ages and your contract must be lousy over there.

The attitudes in the Chief Pilot's office and management were 180 from what we had at COEX. In particular, they did not micromanage pilots. Their philosophy was that we were experienced enough and paid to make the tough decisions...if they start nitpicking, you can develop a culture where people sometimes avoid making the tough, although right, decision because they don't want to defend themselves in front of the Chief Pilot. The motto was "you make the tough call, and we'll back you up." And it wasn't just a motto...they did back you up.
Now, that I can understand quite well. When I first came to work here it was a duplicate of what you describe. We had a chief pilot that was a true idiot and a DO that was worse. The former was replaced and the latter we got rid of (I think he wound up at your former airline and is still there). If that's the guy you have at XJT, I'm not surprised at what you describe. We long since hired a good VP of Flt Ops and the Chiefs are good people too. We've had our differences with the VP but those are contractual disputes, not everyday flight operations. I've never personally experienced any "pressure" do that which I thought imprudent although I do know some folks who did in times past. I guess we've outgrown that phase.

I was always treated with the utmost respect by fellow employees. Something that we all know does NOT happen at the regionals.
I can't really buy that, too broad a brush. My fellow employees have never treated me with less than respect. Respect is not automatic, it has to be earned. If you respect others, they will respect you -- almost always. I think what you describe comes from the immaturity and cockiness that you spoke of earlier. I used to see that here years ago but once the "kids" grew up, most of it went away. When we work with other Comair people, things usually go pretty good. Sometimes we have to work with people from other airlines (like Delta), etc. Some of them start off on the wrong foot but with a little maturity and finesse it all comes out in the wash. The problems that we do have almost always occur at stations where we don't have our own people. Atlanta is a good example of how not to do things.

I confess were not as fancy with the welcoming committee for new hires. There are no "roses" for the wives. We don't have a "heritage museum" but we do get the Kremlin tour. The "social" with the family doesn't come until you upgrade, but that's OUR tradition and custom. Delta of course has its own. Now that the "wings" belong to somebody else and no longer carry our logo, there's not much point in a ceremony. I have no regret that was dropped. In our little world, the union does its thing for the new hires; not very fancy. Apparently the "love in" with management is not as intense in our bailiwick as it is in yours. We'll see how that goes after management succeeds in gutting your contract. I suspect some of the luster of your "indoctrination" may be lost.

I'm really happy that you enjoyed your "mainline experience". It is nice when you get any job that you really want. It is nice too when you're happy with who you are and what you are and you're not longing to be something else. Believe it or not, some of us like our little airline and wish it were still ours. That's history, at least for now. Maybe one day we will know independence again, but I doubt it. That's how the cookie crumbles.

I wish you well, fellow pilot.
 
Last edited:
General Lee said:
Ream me,

..... or the M-1 gun you sleep next to....

Bye Bye--General Lee
You're sorely lacking in some basic knowledge, General. Now, listen up.

"This is my rifle, this is my gun......"
 
General Lee said:
Ream me,


You sound ridiculous. I feel sorry for your daughter---you are probably a really anal-retentive a$$hole father who likes to call her "private!" Boy, that must be fun having you as a terrorizing father! I thought you said "you don't always have to rebutt something." Whut whut? I am right again.

What does "whatever" mean? I means that you and what you say mean NOTHING to me. Why does she say it to you? Sounds like the same deal.

Night night Susan. I like that one. Is that what you say before you go to sleep? Susan is either your wife or the M-1 gun you sleep next to. Which is it?

Bye Bye--General Lee
Is this another one of your fact filled, backed with references no name calling posts private? The last sentence of the first paragraph pretty much sums up my point from yesterday as well.
 
The General is wrong.....again!

General Lee wrote:

<<...businessmen (flying Delta)......are our bread and butter>>

That's the problem......they're GONE!

The shorts-and-sandals travelers are now the bread and butter, and unless you pack 'em in in large numbers, you LOSE!

If you run an airline using "the business traveler" model, you will go out of business......like USAir.

If you use the 'sandals model, you kick friggin' ass.......like SWA and AirTran.

Thankfully for Delta, General Lee is merely a pilot and not running the place.

And the "sassy" attitude at Song is fake and transparent. Having flown both JB and Song, I see a HUGE difference.

When a JB Captain comes to the gate and makes a welcoming PA announcement, I feel his genuineness. He's happy about his job, his co-workers, his passengers.

When a Song Captain does the same, it seems so fake......like he's only there 'cause pp 347 in the manual says he must. He's disgruntled, embarrased that he has to be seen like that, and longs for the days when he will fly only businessmen again!

Can't fake corporate culture.
 
GL, I understand your positon completely. You have no choice to but to see things from one perspective, yours. You are wanting to hold on to a position at a major airline, and you will believe anything that points towards you staying there and having the great airline pilots life. Your worked hard to get there and I am sure you deserve it. That said, just but some reality in the mix, or add a disclaimer saying your no expert and you really don't know and your post would be a lot more meaningful.

BTW, don't ever tell someone to prove something with facts and back it up. It sounds silly coming from the guy who said "Well, I have a FA friend at ASA and she said that all the pilots were jumping up and down when they heard the lists were gonna be merged". Thats nothing more than hearsay and NOT a fact and makes your post to me about PROVING things seem defensive. The only thing it proves is my point.
 
rgd said:
GL, I understand your positon completely. You have no choice to but to see things from one perspective, yours. You are wanting to hold on to a position at a major airline, and you will believe anything that points towards you staying there and having the great airline pilots life. Your worked hard to get there and I am sure you deserve it. That said, just but some reality in the mix, or add a disclaimer saying your no expert and you really don't know and your post would be a lot more meaningful.

BTW, don't ever tell someone to prove something with facts and back it up. It sounds silly coming from the guy who said "Well, I have a FA friend at ASA and she said that all the pilots were jumping up and down when they heard the lists were gonna be merged". Thats nothing more than hearsay and NOT a fact and makes your post to me about PROVING things seem defensive. The only thing it proves is my point.
She knows that to be true whether she can admit it here or not.
 
Last edited:
Surplus,

I'm not going to respond to your post line by line. It was not meant as an attack on you, your airline, or my former airline. You asked why would anyone want to go to a major and I listed my experiences, trying to touch on non-economic reasons why somebody might actually want to go to a major from a regional in the future.

I enjoyed my time at Expressjet/COEX...its a nice place to work. The people are nice. I found going to a major was a much better experience and was a better place to be a pilot.

If you have to respond with venom, why do you ask any questions? You have no idea who I am, or my experience(s), so don't go making assumptions. For some reason you are very defensive and I wasn't attacking you, just trying to answer your question.

Good luck
 
Back to original!

Getting back to the original thread of "Delta to look different in a year...." I'm just curious. GG has been on the board for how long at delta? Why now does he need to "review" everything?? If he's on the Board, he knows, or should know.... A lot of what is going on doesn't seem too practical at D. It seems like a lot of cosmetics to show some kind of concern. Bottom line at D is that employees are unhappy taking paycuts, LCC's are growing and lovin' it all the way to the bank. Delta is a now and has been for a long while, a majorly dysfunctional family. Look at the dialogue. In this airline environment today, you're gonna die with what you have....A major shortage of cash and a whole lot of pissed off people working for you. Everyone clawing for the last bit.

USC
 
USC :

It is a tremendously complex and challenging situation. Grinstein needs a re-org plan that is "do-able."

For instance, if Grinstein asks for productivity improvements to get the average Delta pilot to fly more than 47 hours in a month, that is going to result in abother 1,000 furloughs. At the same time, Delta is trying to recall furloughed pilots and paying ( General help me with the exact figure ) something like 200 pilots over $100,000 a year who are not even trained on current Delta equipment.

The airline could use a 70 to 130 seat aircraft, but has no credit. The Canadian government is a possible source of credit, but then you run into ALPA's current scope policy and the mainline MEC does not really want to enable a bunch of 70 seat flying ( at around half of what current non assigned furloughees are "earning" to do nothing ).

Throw in a large labor lawsuit that threatens to interject the pilots currently flying the CRJ700 into the negotiations and the amount of uncertainty out there as to exactly when the plug will be pulled and it amazes me that any manager can "plan" a way out.

At United and US Air we have seen a lot of reactive management. To Grinstein's credit he appears to be a proactive guy, but this is as difficult a situation as I've seen any corporate manager face.

I think parts of Grinstein's plan are already being carried out, quietly. I also think, but can not yet confirm, that some further consolidation of the ASA / Comair / Delta operation is happening to gain efficiencies of scale and reduce redundant positions. It will be easier to handle the employees if this is done proactively, before any resistance can be contemplated.

Delta is in a war for its survival and there will be casualties.
 
The WSJ is reporting that creditors have formed a committee to restructure some of DL's liabilities. This is a positive step as it should give creditors a full picture of what is owed, and how much each has to give up in order to help keep the company out of 11. Dealing with DL individually would take forever, and DL doesn't have forever.

Although this should help, DL will never be able to shed it's Pension problems without going through 11, and allowing the Feds to pick up the problem. There isn't a lender in the world that give DL reasonable credit without them shedding the pension debt. The same applies to UAL. They will not get a dime from anyone without getting rid of their pension. The problem with all this is the taxpayers will have to foot the bill for UAL's pension to the tune of $6.B. I think there is a pattern evolving here.
 
Lowecur,


Taxpayer dollars used to encourage "Big Agriculture"

Taxpayer dollars used to fund the Office of Strategic Influence(OSI) a group that was set up to flack forthe war on terrorism, now to stay open indefinately.

Taxpayer dollarsof 50 million used to truck sand into an eroding beach to have it washed away in a few years.

Taxpayer dollars to subsidize outsourcing homeland security uniforms:eek: !

Taxpayer dollars used to underwrite the deforestation in Africa.

Taxpayer dollars the military lost to the tune of 2.7 Billion. In the form of military property and several jet engines for fighter aircraft.

How about taxpayer dollars of 270K for an airforce general to renovate his kitchen which should have been for a military ops account.

Please do not even start to talk about taxpayer waste!! Just do a search on the internet of "taxpayer dollars" I am sure there has been enough wasted in the past 10 years to fund not just all airline pensions, but numerous other companies.

I for one do not have a problem paying some of MY taxpayer dollars to pay for pilots pensions that should have been funded, and protected, but due to pi$$ poor management decisions and "golden" parachutes to the elite are all but vanished.

Infact come to think of it, I pay SS tax which I will NEVER see in my lifetime, how about I pay that amount every year to protect my pension?

Tell me Lowecur, how you could give two sh1ts about the billions of taxpayer dollars wasted every year but god forbid those "greedy" pilots have their EARNED pensions protected.

AAflyer,

P.S. I caught much of your conversion on AMR earlier, and as Capt Marco Ramius said to young Dr. Ryan in "Hunt for Red October" I have read your notes, but your conclusions are all wrong.
 
Last edited:
AAflyer said:
Lowecur, P.S. I caught much of your conversion on AMR earlier, and as Capt Marco Ramius said to young Dr. Ryan in "Hunt for Red October" I have read your notes, but your conclusions are all wrong.
I think Freud called it the "Indians and Chief Complex." The little guys always getting screwed. You think the airline business is the only business in this country getting the shaft? I have people next door to me on both sides that still don't have jobs after a year of looking. The advantage you have sir, is at least when you're working you're doing something you love. If there's ever a next time, pick a profession where you get to call your own shots.

Incidently, I have a problem with most pensions. They were created by collective bargaining genius', who had to justify their existance to the workforce. Federal, State, City, and County pensions are my pet peave because they don't have to go through Chapt 11 when they're underfunded - they just raise taxes. The Legacy pilots created their own monster, and now they want the rest of us to clean up the mess. Unfortunately, realistic expectations don't go hand in hand with narcissm.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top