arthompson
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2005
- Posts
- 540
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ASApuppy said:General Lee,
I, for one, appreciate your honesty. Thank you. Hopefully for all of us, the light in the end of the tunnel will start to shine.
ASAPuppy
General Lee said:No more pay cuts. That 14% pay cut was the SAME pay cut we had last December, but now permanent. We will actually get pay raises starting Jan 07. We will also get large chunks of money via the $650 million in pension payments (divided into 6000 pilots) plus an additional $2.1 billion in equity, which at 20 cents to the dollar would really equal around $420 million, which divided by 6000 pilots could equal an additional $70,000 each before taxes. Add to that a 9% addition to a DC plan for each paycheck, in our own names, added to the 2% company matching on our 401Ks, makes it not too bad. To sum it up, we should get about $160,000 in cash, and extra 9% for a DC plan, and limits on RJs that needed a small first class section anyway. Not bad.
Bye Bye--General Lee
General Lee said:I am not lying to anyone. I never have. I looked at the whole thing and thought voting YES was the way to go. I have always wanted our furloughed pilots to get back ASAP, and I think they will, with about 1 in 4 accepting a recall. That will return the ones that want to come back. I used to slam scope, saying no more than 70 seats. Well, I looked at the deal, with the number of RJs allowed and what would happen if they try to furlough mainline pilots, and thought it was a good deal. Our RJs need a first class section anyway, and if management tries to furlough those seats go away, costing them even more money. The other issues seemed ok too, and the whole deal restricted the use of more 1113c processes, and no force mejeur clauses for expanding the RJ seats. It looked like a pretty good deal considering that we are in BK. And, I did tell the truth about my vote. I don't mind the pot shots, but how about those guys debating the actual issues. They can't.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Beanie said:Because a debate requires that you pick a side a keep it. You don't seem to grasp this.
D'Angelo said:Actually a debate means you can look at the issues and make the best decision possible. Why all the anger for guys doing whats best? Its basically how this type of things always go down. Guys get all emotional at first doing their chest pounding. The vocal minority tries to get everyone fired up. People then use logic and reasoning and vote what they think is best for their career. It doesnt matter whats best for everyone elses career, we are in a dog fight. This is exactly how things went down at comair and it was a beautiful day when people finally used their heads not their anger.
arthompson said:However you have to appreciate his honesty and his willingness to look at the final results and make a decision. One should never decide how they're going to vote till a TA is presented and can be looked at.
Beanie said:And one shouldn't shoot their mouth off about how they and the other 50.1% of the pilot group are going to vote until a TA is presented and can be looked at.
So do us all a favor and stop trying.General Lee said:Anyway, I don't have to explain anymore to you.
benjakes said:ok,
See GL above. He says "our RJ's" need first class. I am dying. First, he reduces scope. now he acknoledges ASA/COMAIR ARE HIS BROTHERS AND SISTERS. I need to go to church this week!
Thank You said:I got your group hug right here!
DDpaysoff said:I got your group hug right here!