Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta offers furloughs

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Pretty weak arguement OYS. Let me ask you this...

Would you rather be working for a carrier like Delta that ALREADY does long-range international, or...

a carrier like Southwest who doesn't YET do any (and if you think that will stay the same you have your head in the sand). Do you understand the growth potential in option number 2?

Keep doubting SW for another 40 years, please.

RF
.

I would rather fly for one that is already an established player, one with slots and planes that can do it. What you don't see is that unless you want to go to out of the way airports like Ryanair in Europe, you had better start applying for gates and landing slots at every major airport in Europe. Then, find a partner there with local expertise, who knows the local intel. Then, pick a plane to make it over there, and stand in line waiting for the new planes.

The FAA and DOT like giving you guys slots here in the US, but foreign governments might not be as receptive, especially if you intend to go after their own national airline. So, slots anywhere else may be tough to get. Airline partnerships may also be tough to find. Most big airlines are a part of huge alliances, and they use their people to service all alliance partners' planes, which saves costs.

And you may be Boeing's best customer, but don't expect to jump infront of any other Major airlines (international and domestic) for new planes, like the 787. Airlines like Qatari or Korean Air just won't put up with that, and Southwest isn't even on their radar. You can try to buddy up to them, but they probably don't care.

I hope this doesn't discourage you, but rather gives you insight into some of your future international speed bumps. It just isn't as easy as you would think. Delta's Europe routes were developed at Pan Am originally over decades. Northwest's Asia flying has been around for decades and many treaties. When both are doing well, they are huge money makers. You can try to walk in and start your own service, but it won't be the same. People's Express tried it, and that isn't one you should try to copy.



OYS
 
Kidding right? You ever read the dozen or so SWA folks on here that continually go on about how wonderful they are and how and how all other airlines suck? How about how ALPA sucks and SWAPA is the answer or how code sharing with RJ's to feed mainline is a crime but farming out an expansion to Mexico with Volaris 737's is OK. How SWA pilots, who for years and years worked for much lower pay and benefits than the industry standard and after a few years of getting their pay up start harping like they are the answer,...... how it's wrong for some guy who paid for RJ training to advance his career but it's OK to buy a 737 type to get a job?.... how they want to merge with an airline and enjoy all that it brings to the table but thinks it's pilots should play some kind of subservient role and be just be happy they are now SWA pilots???

Now that said, I'M NOT BASHING YOU GUYS, the simple fact is everything goes in cycles. You are doing very well, certainly no were near as well as DAL was in it's heyday, but good nevertheless. That will change, for both airlines. Not if, but when. We all live glass houses.

So true!
 
During sim training. They cover it for indoc, and then guys have to cover it on their own. Most guys just get a crash pad behing Virginia Avenue. Nothing like buying a type for a job though.


SWA doesn't require anyone to buy a type; only that you have a type prior to class.
 
Southwest: Southwest B737 Captains earn more than Delta B747/B777 Captains, SWAPA represents Southwest airlines pilots and Southwest Airlines pilots only, and Southwest has yet to outsource a good portion of it's flying to the lowest bidding air carriers.

Delta: Low pay, a union who represents Delta pilots and almost everyone else, and outsourcing is alive and well. It is quite easy to buy a ticket on Delta.com, fly across the US or around the world for that matter and never have a Delta pilot employed on any flight segment. Thanks ALPA.

My hat's of to the Southwest pilots, you guys and gals are doing it right.
 
Last edited:
SWA doesn't require anyone to buy a type; only that you have a type prior to class.

So, unless your dad owns a 737 simulator, or you got one at a previous carrier, you will have to pay for one, right? Most people then will have to pay for one, and that isn't right. A bad, old policy that luckily a bunch of Airtran pilots now won't have to follow. Will SWAPA require the Airtran guys to forfeit $10k now in order to be "accepted" on their list? Read the fine print Airtran guys.


OYS
 
Southwest: Southwest B737 Captains earn more than Delta B747/B777 Captains, SWAPA represents Southwest airlines pilots and Southwest Airlines pilots only, and Southwest has yet to outsource a good portion of it's flying to the lowest bidding air carriers.

Delta: Low pay, a union who represents Delta pilots and almost everyone else, and outsourcing is alive and well. It is quite easy to buy a ticket on Delta.com, fly across the US or around the world for that matter and never have a Delta pilot employed on any flight segment. Thanks ALPA.

My hat's of to the Southwest pilots, you guys and gals are doing it right.

Nice post FBN. And I agree 100%. The Anti-SW crowd just can't stand the fact that we get treated well from management, make a ton of money and really enjoy our jobs. It's a great place to work, and that makes it a great place for passengers when the workers are happy. Very simple.

Oh, and keep everything 'in-house', of course.

A 5k type rating? Chump change in the big picture, plus you can either right the whole thing off or get the GI bill to cover it. 'Nough said.

RF
 
Nice post FBN. And I agree 100%. The Anti-SW crowd just can't stand the fact that we get treated well from management, make a ton of money and really enjoy our jobs. It's a great place to work, and that makes it a great place for passengers when the workers are happy. Very simple.

Oh, and keep everything 'in-house', of course.

A 5k type rating? Chump change in the big picture, plus you can either right the whole thing off or get the GI bill to cover it. 'Nough said.

RF

Too bad you can't share that "enjoy our jobs" part with the Airtran guys. You'd rather pressure them into accepting something they do not deserve. I bet you agree 100% with that too, but just won't say anything. And is a 5 or 10K type rating chump change to an RJ guy who may already be struggling? What if he doesn't get the job? Has that ever happened before? Sure it has.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Southwest Captain pay is 186.06 per trip.

A simple 1.15 conversion would yeild an hourly rate of about 214/hr.

Many longer haul flights would convert at 1.18, being 219.55/hr.

With the possiblity of easily making 110-120 trips if desired. (no union imposed caps)

RF
 
Too bad you can't share that "enjoy our jobs" part with the Airtran guys. You'd rather pressure them into accepting something they do not deserve. I bet you agree 100% with that too, but just won't say anything. And is a 5 or 10K type rating chump change to an RJ guy who may already be struggling? What if he doesn't get the job? Has that ever happened before? Sure it has.


Bye Bye---General Lee

Hey General, the Airtran guys are gonna be fine, they will get a FANTASTIC new payscale and be much better off with all the QOL issues and a friendly management team....and they deserve it! And many, many people have interviewed at SW without the type rating, and were hired.

RF
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top