Bill,
Thanks for agreeing. You said:
The lower payscale of all employees involved with song will keep this from happening. the union realize this is a very real possiblity and so they are going to fight tooth and nail to keep the same payscale at song as at mainline, so when the flying does get transfered over, the employees aren't the ones losing out.
Delta's unionized pilots are going to be flying for Song at the same wages as they are flying mainline today. Like another participant said (sorry I forget who), most likely Delta pilots will be flying Song flights as part of their rotation. The issue of Song wages for mainline flight crews has already been taken care of. "The union" won't be fighting because they have already been given satisfactory contract terms, no matter where Song flies or what mainline flying it "steals". The remainder (and majority) of Song employees are non-union, have no contract and will be working for lower wages.
BLUE BAYOU said:
My point exactly. The reason Continental Lite failed is because they competed with themselves. 2 Lite flights against their mainline in some routes for example. If Song should takeoff, they will take customers away from mainline where the more profitable ticket prices are. Therefore, in the end, even though Song might make money, it will be at the expense of mainline Delta. Additionally, did anybody think about how this will also impact Delta's partners Continental and NWA at EWR and LGA? I'm sure they're pleased about this venture too...
Continental Lite (and Metrojet, and Shuttle by UA) failed because they used the generally ineffective 'airline within an airline' model, not necessarily because they competed with themselves. They had no differentiation in their product, marketing, or branding efforts. They claimed to be low cost carriers but were too intertwined with their parent mainline carrier to truly lower their cost struture. They had poor, vague strategies for competing. Song is a completely different product, owned by Delta and flown by Delta pilots. There is no branding confusing Song with Delta.
You said the more profitable ticket prices are at mainline? In some areas, but not where Song will be competing (leisure east coast flying, primarily, to start). Is there higher revenue at mainline? Yes. Higher costs? Yes. Less profit (more loss)? Yes. Delta mainline hasn't posted a year-end net profit since 2000. Delta may be able to command a higher average yield (systemwide) than Song will, but Delta's costs are also much higher. Song is only "cannibalizing" mainline Delta in leisure markets where Delta's cost structure is too high to compete with FL and B6. Instead of Delta posting huge losses in these markets, Song will (may) make money with their lower cost structure and the
same fares that Delta (with its higher costs) has to offer today in order to compete for market share. This will free up mainline Delta resources (aircraft) that are currently operating at a loss in these NY<-->FL-type markets to expand services in other markets where they can be operated profitably. Mainline Delta losses in the leisure markets will be reduced, Song will be profitable in these markets, and the entire company will benefit from both. Sounds like a solid plan to me.