Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta Hopes for Merger Agreement with NWA or UAL in Next 2 Weeks

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

On Your Six

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2004
Posts
4,507
Here we go...... Looks like the Delta Board of Directors is motivated and Delta will be the buyer...

Read below (from CNBC.com):

Delta Air Lines has started merger talks with Northwest Airlines and United Airlines parent UAL, and hopes to reach an agreement with one of them over the next two weeks, The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.
AP​
The report, citing unnamed people familiar with the situation, said Delta's board gave Chief Executive Richard Anderson permission last Friday to hold talks with both carriers simultaneously.

Delta aims to present a preferred partner when Delta's board next meet in early February, with a deal announcement coming as early as mid-February, the paper reported.

Delta spokeswoman Betsy Talton, reiterating previous statements, said: "A special committee of the board is working with management to explore strategic options, including potential consolidation transactions. However we are not providing updates, while this process is ongoing."

UAL declined to comment. Northwest was not immediately available for comment. The pending talks were originally reported by the Wall Street Journal last week. The companies have not commented.

The U.S. airline industry is battling to sustain its fledgling recovery, which is threatened by soaring fuel prices and a softening U.S. economy. Most major U.S. airlines are expected to post losses for the fourth quarter of 2007 after profits earlier in the year.

Mergers are seen as a way to stabilize the volatile and fragmented industry by allowing carriers to cut costs, reduce capacity and raise fares.
A Delta deal with either UAL or Northwest would likely be an all-stock transaction because of the need for the airlines to conserve cash in the face of market uncertainty.

Either deal would make Delta, which has said it wants to be a buyer if the industry consolidates, the largest airline in the world, overtaking AMR Corp's American Airlines. Delta, the No. 3 U.S. carrier, has a market value of more than $4.1 billion, higher than UAL's $3.8 billion and Northwest's $3.7 billion. United is the second-largest U.S. carrier, while Northwest is No. 5.

Delta, which emerged from bankruptcy last spring after fending of a hostile bid from US Airways Group, has been at the forefront of airline merger talks for months.

In November, it said it had set up a special board committee and hired financial and legal advisers to help it review its strategic options, including mergers.
Industry lawyers and consultants say Delta will likely come under an unprecedented antitrust review if it decides to propose a merger with either airline.

For a deal to succeed, the carriers would also have to win over the industry's powerful unions, which are seeking to claw back some of the concessions made during the industry's five-year slump, which ended in 2006.
 
Last edited:
"Brace, brace, brace....!!!"
 
What does Fly4hire think of this?

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
They're going to have to do something within the next couple of months, otherwise they'll have to deal with a new DOJ under a new administration. Their chances are much better if they can get a deal sent to the DOJ for review under a Bush administration.
 
I stated it in first of DEC...will happen in FEB..

My source is awesome !!!

Did they tell you Delta and United will merge and US Airways and Northwest will merge? That is my predicition. Now if this does take place, which hubs will be reduced. I tend to think MEM, SLC, IAD, and CVG will be reduced as hubs.
 
Reducing hubs will not be politically acceptable... When is it ever acceptable to reduce thousands of jobs? Probably never unless liquidation is imminent... The local politicians will never allow that and they will balk at anything that could adversely impact their districts. That's why merger combinations with the least hub overlap make sense - you can still preserve some jobs.

In that case, DAL + NWA makes more sense than DAL + UAL (LAX, JFK and SLC/DEN hubs will need to be reviewed at the very least). DAL and UAL also both offer competing transcon service and JFK-London service. The DOJ could nix everything or take a very long time to complete impact studies - how will competition and consumers be impacted by reducing choice in certain markets? You can bet that a Democratic-led Congress will do whatever it can to protect employee interests. Any consolidation process could take a long time. Just imagine the thorny integration planning process - OUCH!

One thing is for certain, with the potential for a big mess in the 121 world, the Fractionals are looking better all the time!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Did they tell you Delta and United will merge and US Airways and Northwest will merge? That is my predicition. Now if this does take place, which hubs will be reduced. I tend to think MEM, SLC, IAD, and CVG will be reduced as hubs.

If yours comes true, I don't think IAD will be reduced much. Its a better hub and spoke for connections, geographically, than NYC. NYC is now seevrely slotted compared to last year, so there is zero incentive to do anything other than O&D and the bare necessary domestic feed. IAD is well suited to remain almost as large (with some RJ reductions at both airports). IAD will still have a very strong domestic and international O&D, and superfulous hub and spoke capacity at both JFK and IAD (but mostly IAD) can be diverted to ATL, with all 3 leverging the best international portions of each market.
 
In that case, DAL + NWA makes more sense than DAL + UAL (LAX, JFK and SLC/DEN hubs will need to be reviewed at the very least). DAL and UAL also both offer competing transcon service and JFK-London service.


UAL's JFK operation is miniscule even to JetBlue's. It will not be a player either way. I think UAL cut JFK-LHR out anyway, didn't they? Even if not, that one route already has mega competition so its 100% irrelevant. The domestic transcons that UAL does out of JFK pale in comparison to even little JetBlue, let alone CAL at EWR and AA at JFK. DAL/UAL may very well not happen, but if it does, or even if its tried, UAL's JFK presence will not even be a blip on the radar of anyone.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom