Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta has changed its minds about Pinnacle

  • Thread starter Thread starter NWA
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 19

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
CRJ Puppy wrote

Please look at page 98 of the 2007 year end financial statement for Delta. Here you will read that Delta ordered and "owns" 40 CRJ 900 series.

That is true but those 40 do not include Pinnacle's aircraft. Pinnacle alone is responsible for those AC. Had they left the widget tail family they would very likely end up with a red tail still operated by the same crews. The PCL crews will tell you that Delta's ground support for the regionals does not come any where close to the support NW provides. It has been a real culture shock to go back to doing business the way it was done 15 years ago with turbo props. Most of them weren't around then so it has been a steep learniong curve.
 
This shows a real lack of leadership at the highest level coming from Delta wich is a bit disturbing, more along the lines of what U would pull. It seems as managment shot from the hip until the legal dept. said whoa, we better take another look here.

Regarding Delta ground ops in ATL - very pathetic handling of the CRJ, like they have just showed up yesterday. In the rampers defense it seems as if they have little or no training on just about every aspect of ground handling the CRJ.
 
Source, please?

Anyone have a source?

Good for the PCL guys if true.
 
This is pretty much industry standard. Those of you who remember ACA will recall that when Delta "pulled the plug" on the DoJet flying that while on Nov 1st the planes were "ACA's" that on Nov 2nd they reverted back to Delta. This is why in the previous Delta memo regarding the Pinnacle flying it said that those aircraft would be reassigned to another DCI carrier. They can reassign them because they "own" them.

This isn't correct. ACA "put" the aircraft to Delta per the contract. If DL canceled the contract for anything other than performance reasons, then ACA could choose to keep the aircraft or make Delta take the leases. DL was watching our performance numbers very closely in the summer and fall of 04 hoping that we would not be able to make our performance numbers (and with the engine issues it was very close) so ACA would be stuck with the aircraft. DL had no say where the aircraft ended up. It was entirely up to ACA, and because there was no need for them with Independence Air, ACA exercised the option to put the leases to Delta.

Also, if you read the initial press release from Pinnacle, it says:

Under the agreement, Pinnacle will directly acquire and finance the aircraft. Pinnacle will take delivery of the aircraft between November 2007 and July 2008, with scheduled service as a Delta Connection carrier beginning in December 2007. The term of the agreement is for ten years

Which means Pinnacle owns the airplanes, and the only way DL will get them is if the contract is violated and Pinnacle decides to assign the leases to Delta.
 
Last edited:
You still have not posted a source and I have not seen anything on this. I think this might be a bs post, not that 90% on here isnt anyway.



It's pretty common knowledge that Anderson and Trenary have a long running good history with each other. Anderson's days at NWA were when Pinnacle had it's exponential growth.
 
The "ownership" of the CRJ900's is more complicated than any of you seem to realize. Both PCL and Delta have there name on the aircraft in some way. I don't really understand it, and I doubt any of you do either.

You should be careful with "facts".

Here's one for you: We are all f'd.
What's that number for truckmasters? Oh, wait, they are f'd too.

Perhaps I could become a gigolo. I would probably have to loose about 15 lbs to get the high-end good paying female clients though...


Turbo
 
The "ownership" of the CRJ900's is more complicated than any of you seem to realize. Both PCL and Delta have there name on the aircraft in some way. I don't really understand it, and I doubt any of you do either.

You should be careful with "facts".

Here's one for you: We are all f'd.
What's that number for truckmasters? Oh, wait, they are f'd too.

Perhaps I could become a gigolo. I would probably have to loose about 15 lbs to get the high-end good paying female clients though...


Turbo
 

Latest resources

Back
Top