Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta Flight Manager Memo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treme
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 1

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Treme

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2003
Posts
137
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Letter from the Head of 737 Training at DAL to his Instructors...

September 15, 2003 An open letter to all 737 SLIs:

Things are pretty tough right now, aren't they guys? There seems to be no end to the gloom and doom we hear about Delta and the rest of the "big boys" in the airline industry. United may not emerge from bankruptcy. US Air not much better off. American slashing costs and employees with reckless abandon. Southwest, Air Tran, Jet Blue . . eating into our markets. Our own company publicly asking for huge mid-contract concessions. We've got some
cash to last awhile, but without a better revenue picture and lower costs to produce our product, it seems only a matter of time until something gives.

You know me. I represent the Company in some of your eyes. But, what I have to say here is not from the perspective of a Company pilot, and I'm not a Kool-Aid drinker. I've been in management for 4-5 years, but I've been in ALPA for 16. I have 13 years to retirement. Saying what somebody else told
me to say in an effort to sway your opinion isn't my style, and it wouldn't fool you anyway. What I have to say here might not sit well with the lead dog on either side of the argument. But, it needs to be said. If you're interested in what I think about our situation, read on. If you aren't, you can stop here. This isn't an official memo.

Anybody remember when Sears and Roebuck Company and Montgomery Ward were going strong? Anybody remember when JC Penny was on top of the retail world? I do. I'm old enough to remember when Sears and Wards and Pennys were the
business leaders in retailing. They had the lion's share of the market. They competed with each other, but there was plenty of business for everyone. Life was good, then. It's not so good now. What happened to them?

The market changed. Seriously changed. A company called Home Depot found a better and cheaper way to provide what the customer wanted. A dude named Sam Walton founded a company that could put the product in the customers hands
for less . . much less. The business model that the Sears and Montgomery Ward and JC Penny guys were using started to fall apart. They couldn't compete. The customer was demanding more for less, and someone was in a position to provide it for them. Sound familiar?

Right now, there are pilots (and other employees) at Southwest, Jet Blue, and Air Tran that are doing the same job you do, but they are doing it for less money. They don't belong to ALPA and could care less about what ALPA National thinks or what you think. It's part of what has made American economics great, like it or not. Supply and Demand. There are pilots who will supply the manpower needed to fly the airplanes, and they'll supply it
at a lower cost to their respective companies than we do for ours. And it's not just pilots, but labor in general. That gives their company a competitive advantage. The simple fact of the matter is we are being Wal-Mart'd and Home Depot'd out of business. The aviation version of the warehouse approach flies orange 737s and Airbusses with blue tails and green 717s by the dozens out of our own hub, right here in Mecca.

Now for the emotional part. It doesn't really matter what you or I think about Mr. Mullin or the SERP; it doesn't matter whether you like Mr. Reid or Ms Escarra. Their pay and benefits are driven by market forces, just like ours . . anybody got a "United +1%" sticker on their flight kit? Tying our future actions to past emotional events would be cutting off our noses to
spite our face, literally. The way I see it, we have a choice to make. A career impacting choice. A "will you be working for Delta in 5 years?" kind of choice.

We are made up of several different special interest groups within the Delta pilot collective. There's the real senior group, who are within a few years of retirement. There's the middle group, hired during the late 80's and early 90's . . just getting comfortable as or just making Captain. Then there's the "post Contract '96" group, mostly hired from '96 on. Make no
mistake, there are competing interests here. The senior group has shown much of their hand . . witness the recent spate
of early retirements. They are mostly in the widebody and international Captain seats . . the highest paid positions in the pilot group. Let me be blunt . . many of them believe their best interests are served by maintaining the highest possible paycheck for the next few years. Some of them saw the handwriting on the wall and bailed early. I would have too, in
their position. So would you. The remainder have FAE and lump sum to worry about . . if Delta can just hang on a little longer.

(continued...)
 
continued

(continued...)


Those in the middle group have way too much time invested in Delta and way too long to retirement to be willing to see Delta cease to operate. It would be hard to start over, the kids are in college, they have the Captain's house and mortgage, that alimony payment, they're just on the cusp of the big paychecks, and nobody worth working for will hire a 50 year old pilot.
They're virtually stuck. And they're nervous as a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.

The last group has a few years invested, but not so many that starting over would be impossible. I hear "Remember Contract '96" from some of these guys, but their IDs tend to show a date of hire after that event. They're pissed
off, but don't ask them to explain why. They were red-headed-step-children in Orlando . . C scale and all that . . earned their 4th stripe down there after 3 or 4 years. They can't believe Leo and Company would take the SERP .. well, yeah they can . . it's management versus workers.. David and Goliath . . Upton Sinclair's Jungle.

Oh, and there's a fourth group I forgot to mention. That would be the largest group . . many, many pilots from each of these seniority groups but not really part of them emotionally. They're reasonable, hard working guys, professional in what they do. They're Democrats and Republicans but fairly conservative, fiscally speaking. They make more money doing a job they absolutely love than they ever thought they would. They wouldn't think of
abusing sick leave and wish there was some better way to find out who is.

They pay their ALPA dues and assessments, vote during elections, and voted to pay the medical benefits for the furloughees . . only seemed right.

They're hoping all are back on the property soon but know there has to be some growth for that to happen. They hate what's happened at United and USAir, but know it's just business. They wonder how ALPA is going to fairly represent all these competing pilot groups. They don't always understand or agree with Company Management . . and wonder what Marketing is thinking,
sometimes. And, they know Delta is in a hell of a mess.

You've heard of the concept of "pattern bargaining". That's where that "United +1%" sticker came from. That's where our last contract came from.

Well, there's a new pattern emerging, but here we are at Delta with paychecks considerably above the industry norm. Not our fault, but we're glad to be here. Everyone else is moving backwards right now . . we make a whole lot more than our counterparts at American and United and USAir. We
make more than the pilots at AirTran and Jet Blue and Southwest. And we have a contract that's good for another year and a half . . until May of '05. We're "sittin' pretty", so to speak.

But the Wal Marts and Home Depots of the airline industry are moving ahead with their plans to put Delta out of business. The warehouse discounters of the airline world are putting a product on the streets that may not be as good as ours, but it costs less. We have enough cash to last for awhile, but the end is in sight. That light at the end of the tunnel is a train, men.

The further we cut into the cash balance, the narrower the long term choices get.

Here's what I'd suggest we can do. Just my opinion. Two ways we can go from here. We can hold onto the paycheck for now, wait until the contract is negotiated, and fight it out with the company. And take the inevitable pay cut, and go the brink of strike, and poison the relationship even further, weakening the company. We can show Senior Management that we won't be pushed around, a contract is a contract, and we're still pissed off about their golden parachutes. In other words, status quo, business as usual. And, maybe Delta would survive and maybe it wouldn't. Maybe we'd finish our careers at Delta, and maybe we wouldn't. Maybe we'd get bought out by a Lorenzo clone,
and maybe we wouldn't.

Or, maybe better, at least in my mind . . we could agree to a pay cut in the near term. How much . . I don't know. Something substantial is called for, and I have a number in my head. You probably do, too. The important thing is relieving the cash flow strain between now and the new contract and giving
the company the ability to compete with Big Orange, Big Blue, and Big A. We could bury, for all intents and purposes, the traditional competition from UA, AA, and USAir. We could then focus on the discounters and kick their ever-lovin behinds. Next, we need to identify places in our contract where the fat exists. Places where we cost the company money, but it wouldn't hurt
the average guy much to make a change. You know guys who NEVER fly . . so do I. There is some low hanging fruit out there. We won't all agree, and the discussion will be lively, for sure. But, there's a huge risk if we don't get more efficient. Even that word, in and of itself, is controversial.

Efficient, in some people's minds, means more furloughs or a delay in the return of those who are already furloughed. I'd suggest efficiency means the ability to compete, means less of a cash pay cut, means the prospect of the furloughees coming back to a stronger company, means them coming back sooner
rather than later.

This is a time for leadership, not sitting back and watching others make the decisions. This is about your career and future . . my career and future. The traditional loud voices representing special interests and small minorities within our pilot group need to be drowned out by the voices of reason. The political hacks and those with a personal agenda need to be sidelined while the normally silent majority is heard and the path we take
is chosen. You and I have the same right as anyone else in ALPA and anyone else in the pilot group to speak our mind. We have a lot at stake!

I'd love to hear what you think. Don't wait for someone else to build your future. Call your rep, listen to the code-a-phones. Get on the websites and speak your mind.

Regards,

XXXXX
 
I think the Delta pilots would willing to take the cut if management promised to give back the pay once the RPM's increased again.

my .02 cents
 
Wow, well said, he spoke from all sides, well said, very nice. Whether you agree or not, you have to at least listen to him.
 
Well-written, and he makes some very good points.

He lost me, though, when he claims that this will give them the ability to "come whomp on the discounters". the $100./hr per flight crew isn't going to somehow make that possible anymore than selling one more seat on each flight is going to.

Also, he's mistaken when he says assumes that Delta has a better product across the board than the LCC's. Things have changed. The LCC's have improved and added quality, while the majors have reduced quality. Sure, we don;t have the network they have, but the quality of service may surprise you.

Hop on a Delta flight from ATL to anywhere around 1 hour away- say, GPT, PNS, MOB, etc. Chances are, you;re going to be on an RJ or an ATR, you are going to get limited beverage service (" . . . due to the short duration of the flight, we will be performing limited beverage service only, serving bottled water or juice . . .").

Now, hop on an AirTran flight to the same city- B717 aircraft, with full service. If you catch an AirTran RJ to PNS, you'll still get full service from the very professional Air Wisconsin F/A.

Sure, if you're a million-miler, we're not going to kiss your luggage tags, but we will let you know that we appreciate your business, and if you want to pay $35 bucks, you can sit in Biz, you're a quarter of the way to a free ticket, and we got you there safe, sound, probably on time, and with a few extra hundreds in your wallet.

In other words, a pay cut alone ain't gonna do it for Delta.
 
Ty

I agree that the paper was well written. Will probably not be readily received by mailnline. He will be taken as a management stooge, but he is 100% corect. It is you I disagree with. What is the difference in "Limited beverage service" and your full service? I have been in back on Delta mainline and ASA ATR's to VPS as well as Airtrans to PNS. The real limited beverage service is really the MD80's less than an hour as they only offer 3 juces or water in coach. ASA and Airtrans seem to offer the exact same drink service as far as I have experienced. There have been times where we have told the FA's to stay seated due to turbulence, but that is fairly unusual.
 
Where does the General weigh in on this? I thought he was always harping about how cash rich Delta is.... or did I miss something?
 
Re: Ty

Tim47SIP [i]: It is you I disagree with. What is the difference in "Limited beverage service" and your full service? I have been in back on Delta mainline and ASA ATR's to VPS as well as Airtrans to PNS. said:
Actually, I commute regularly on us (AirTran) and Delta and ASA, and what I am saying is that AirTran does full service on almost all flights now, whereas ASA and Delta mainline often do not (they serve water or juice, but no coffee, no soda, no schnocktails) . . . blurring the line for the consumer betwen "discount" and "legacy" carriers.

My point (and I am not trying to be argumentative, just trying to clarify here) is that the letter writer seems to take it for granted that we are providing a shoddy product that can be "defeated" by lowering pilot costs. While that was pobably true in the past, there has been a real improvement at FL.

It is no longer new Delta planes with full service versus beat up old DC9's running two hours late and marginal service. It is often RJs or turboprops competing against new B717s that are running on time, with full service, the second best bag-matching in the industry, and a respectable on-time record. We now have a FF program, check-in KIOSKS at every airport, one of the newest fleets, and 100 new B737's on the way.

I think Song is the "test case" for where Leo plans to take mainline. Widebodies doing International and Transcon, RJ's doing the spokes, and the bulk of "Delta" Domestic stuff done via Song, or mainline on Song pay rates, when those get negotiated.
 
Last edited:
You would probably get more of a response to this if you posted it under the Major Airlines section. Im not sure that the General reads this section
 
Maybe a better way to ask that question would be: How many times have airlines gone out of business due to unsustainable cost structures vs revenue?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top