Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DAL one step closer to BK Exit

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FDJ2

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 9, 2003
Posts
3,908
AP
Delta: Bankruptcy Statement Approved
Tuesday February 6, 1:18 pm ET
By Harry R. Weber, AP Business Writer Delta Says It Resolved All Objections to Disclosure Statement

ATLANTA (AP) -- Delta Air Lines Inc., which is operating under bankruptcy protection, has resolved all the objections to the disclosure statement to its reorganization plan, a company lawyer said in court papers Tuesday.
Attorney Marshall Huebner made the comment in a brief filing ahead of Wednesday's bankruptcy court hearing on Delta's request to approve the disclosure statement. Huebner wrote that details of the objections that have been resolved will be discussed at the hearing in New York.
The disclosure statement, which details Delta's operations, must be approved for the Atlanta-based company to be able to begin soliciting votes to approve its reorganization plan, which calls for it to emerge from bankruptcy in the spring as a standalone carrier.
Last month, communities from coast to coast and the operator of a Puerto Rico airport objected to the disclosure statement
Among the objectors was the city of Los Angeles, which said that Delta's reorganization plan couldn't be approved because of undue authority it gave the company to reject certain leases.
Other communities, individuals and entities also objected, including Denver; Palm Beach County, Fla.; the operator of a Puerto Rico airport; an ad hoc committee of creditors; and some banks.
In Tuesday's filing, Huebner wrote, "The Debtors believe that they have resolved every single objection -- formal or informal, filed or unfiled, represented or pro se -- in connection with the disclosure statement and the approval motion."
Delta first filed its reorganization plan and disclosure statement on Dec. 19. It has amended it twice since then. Delta has estimated the company will be worth $9.4 billion to $12 billion if it emerges from Chapter 11 as a standalone company. A hostile bid by Tempe, Ariz.-based US Airways Group Inc. to buy Delta Air Lines Inc. was withdrawn after a major group of Delta's creditors said it supported Delta's standalone plan.
 
I'm not in aviation anymore and haven't been on the board for awhile. Why didn't you guys want the merger? From a business standpoint you would have been a stronger airline and that would translate to secure employment. Just wondering.
 
I'm not in aviation anymore and haven't been on the board for awhile. Why didn't you guys want the merger? From a business standpoint you would have been a stronger airline and that would translate to secure employment. Just wondering.

And you base this on what?
 
The article I read made it sound like the Delta employees were against the merger. It was in the Seattle Times I think.
 
short term no good...long term, good. To much competition!! we need profits!!
 
I'm not in aviation anymore and haven't been on the board for awhile. Why didn't you guys want the merger? From a business standpoint you would have been a stronger airline and that would translate to secure employment. Just wondering.

Their airline would have been chopped up for their international routes. The domestic stuf would have gone on the auction block. I figure if Parker had been sucessful it would have been the end of Delta as we know it. Similar to the PanAm deal. Delta would have been dismantled. While it would not have been great for the employees it may have been a good thing for the industry need of consolidation.
 
Last edited:
Most of what I had read was from a business perspective. I guess long term security isn't much good if you don't have a job in the first place. The only stock I have is in Alaska Airlines. Wish I would have bought some United, US Airwasy or Continental a while ago.
 
The article I read made it sound like the Delta employees were against the merger. It was in the Seattle Times I think.


we were agains the merger. It would have been a horrible merger. Way too much overlap. Would have been many furloughs. And would have left us a very large airline with no Pacific presence.
 
Their airline would have been chopped up for their international routes. The domestic stuf would have gone on the auction block. I figure if Parker had been sucessful it would have been the end of Delta as we know it. Similar to the PanAm deal. Delta would have been dismantled. While it would not have been great for the employees it may have been a good thing for the industry need of consolidation.

On 1/13/07 400AHOLE wrote:
Thanks Whiskey! Lets hope this thing goes through sooner than later.
Then on 1/22/07 Mr. 400AHOLE writes:
WD, for your sake and the rest of the America West and USAIr guys I hope this whole thing doesn't go thru.

Don't you think you should worry about what Air Tran is going to do to your airline ahole?

737

400AHOLE=chuck yogurt/lawman/einstein/texas crotch rot/boris yelling/lame lizard/sky fly
 
On 1/13/07 400AHOLE wrote:
Thanks Whiskey! Lets hope this thing goes through sooner than later.
Then on 1/22/07 Mr. 400AHOLE writes:
WD, for your sake and the rest of the America West and USAIr guys I hope this whole thing doesn't go thru.

Don't you think you should worry about what Air Tran is going to do to your airline ahole?

737

400AHOLE=chuck yogurt/lawman/einstein/texas crotch rot/boris yelling/lame lizard/sky fly


Why can't people just worry about thier own house???

I guess we can add 400AHOLE to the owned list right behind 350Driver and Kid C.
 
Lots of things that Doug Parker did are hard to understand. He does not have a history of chopping up companies, but the govt would have insisted on just that, if this merger had gone through. I think Delta will be best served as a stand alone airline. JMHO
 
Uh...it is our house? The industry we work in.

No, not really... Worry about your own company and let the Delta guys worry about theirs.

Last I checked, only a few companies within the industry were making money so odds are yours isn't one of them. Focus your attention there...
 
No, not really... Worry about your own company and let the Delta guys worry about theirs.

Last I checked, only a few companies within the industry were making money so odds are yours isn't one of them. Focus your attention there...

Just business nothing else.
 
Most of what I had read was from a business perspective.

From a business perspective, you must appreciate that a company with $24B in debt is less healthy than a company with $7.5B in debt when both companies have a similar market reach.

A better question would be how DAL would be more healthy with all that additional debt and no new markets to show for it? I can see how it might be better for LCC, but few would ever say it would be better for DAL.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom