ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
...
What makes people think that SWA won't find itself in the same position as a UAL (recently the holy grail, now the polar opposite)? Yeah, maybe they have much better management than UAL...but HOW do they survive (and continue to survive) in these unprecedented conditions and remain "low cost"?
VOR, the issues are multi-faceted....
But as others have said, from a cost-structure standpoint, SWA is the leader...
First the obvious:
One plane type. Every bloody airframe is essentially the same. This keeps pilot training costs at a minimum, spares costs at a minimum, etc...
Think about UAL, DAL, AAL and the costs associated with maintaining spares for 6 or 8 fleet types. Sims, spares, crews...etc...it goes on and on.
Secondly, SWA, in some markets, utilizes some outlying airports. So at the time, they can get a massive bang for the buck by agreeing to serve that airport.
It's no secret SWA hits their vendors pretty hard, so that also makes a big difference in cost savings.
These are just a few examples...but big ones whe you start looking at costs.
Legacies like I mentioned above need hundreds of millions a day just to turn on the lights....
Massive international hubs, half a dozen or more fleet types....
REALLY big training centers..
HUNDREDS of sims....ever been to AAL training academy? I have...it can be seen from oribit!
So, with all that said, these legacies are burnded with day-to-day fixed costs that is not supported by current fare levels.
SWA, simply by its nature, avoids that type of burden.
Now, I admit, this is a very simplistic view, but I'm not that smart...so that's all I gots!
Ultra