Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Competing for new airplanes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nindiri
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 3

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Why not? U pilots endorsed the outsourcing of flying at U to MESA from the day they walked on the property. Non Union Mesa began flying union routes.The W/O's were not involved in the negotiations. Now they have crafted LOA 83, LOA 91, and whatever else Worthless and Pollack pulls out of the toilet. After the display of fraternal partnership by ALPA National and AAA pilots your naive if you don't endorse RAMMING THE RED HOT POKER up their superior rumps.
 
Well said General Lee!! Nindiri is the exact problem with this industry, Scab mantallity, doesn't see growing regioals is just hurting him in the long run.
Equal pay? What about every thing else that is lost? Reteriment?
Chance to end out your last 10 years flying a 777 at 300+ a year.
Hope he's happy in his little RJ, because that's all he'll ever fly.
 
He wasn't trying to engage in a discussion about ethics - - that was just a red herring, and another launch pad for a discussion of scope.
TonyC

Incorrect. It seems like you can't even talk about anything on this board without the scope or Delta/DCI police getting all over you. I thought the question of which airframes should go where and why was interesting, at least hypothetically and at midnight when nothing else was going on. Apparently I was wrong. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by TonyC If you think any company exists to protect its employees, you're confused.

Not confused. I'm well aware that any company is in business to make money. My post didn't make a claim any different.

Originally posted by Catbird Non Union Mesa began flying union routes.

We're non-union? Then who's taking the 1.95% of my paycheck every two weeks. Danm! Fooled again.
 
Nindiri said:
I thought the question of which airframes should go where and why was interesting, at least hypothetically ...

Nindiri said:
Make no mistake, I don't want to see B717's going to regional partners, either, but I also don't want to see RJ's going to mainline. It blurs the distinction between the two, and opens up a Pandora's box that management would be all to willing to exploit. Why make it any easier for them?
Your agenda was made clear in your second post on this thread. It wasn't a hypothetical ethics question at all.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom