Weasil
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2003
- Posts
- 752
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
jstyle13 said:I've gotta go down to ATL tommorrow and get my stupid SIDA badge renewed becuase I haven't had any time on any of my trips this month to do since it now takes about 2 hours. I'm not taking any bags and I don't plan on wearing my uniform...just business casual. I have a feeling it's going to be a huge pain in the ass trying to get through the checkpoint. Hopefully they will let me go through without any problems....will probably have to wait in the 1 hour line to get through instead of cutting to the front like I normally do....oh well. Anyone had any issues commuting home in/out of uniform?
John Pennekamp said:I would guess that TSA is now wise that crews will be trying to get through in uniform, while off duty. They may ask if you are on duty and ask to see a pairing. I got that after 9-11 several times.
I have also seen crews get extra scrutiny after a big panic like this, because TSA is suspicious of how crews move through the system. In their tiny, parenoid minds, WE could be the terrorists and do an inside job. This is why it would be bad if they found out you're not on duty and tried to get through.
Birddog said:I am more concerned about further carry-on restrictions. If commuters have to start checking bags it could prove to be a real problem.
rjacobs said:If they asked me for a pairing, I would show them the one that started the next day and say I was deadheading to work. If this becomes a big problem for commuters maybe your company, if they fly out of the airport you commute from, can put into your pairing a DH leg from that airport to your base. Just a thought if you have trouble getting through security on a commute. I think they do this for people who live internationally and commute to the USA, but I may be wrong on that.
OCP said:Unless you are going to ops the SIDA area is outside security.
jstyle13 said:Yea...I don't live in ATL...so I've gotta catch a flight down to ATL, watch the video, go outside of security to the office, come back through so I can catch a flight home. Just a pain to get to get my dumb badge renewed. Gotta commute in on an off day.
Birddog said:I am more concerned about further carry-on restrictions.
I can see that part changing once some program is in place to "secure" the stuff we can purchase inside of security. Nothing gets thur TSA at screening but beyond that, it will probably go back to normal.I can understand TSA not wanting liquids brought through security, but if all the same stuff is sold in the terminal, and carry-outs/purses/briefcases are still allowed, how can they expect contraband not to be brought on the aircraft. There's no way to effectively screen for it once a pax is on the secure side of the terminal.
This had me scratching my head also. You can buy all that stuff inside security but can't take it on the plane. But in order to be sure of that they'd have to put a TSA person at every gate to screen every passenger.ReverseSensing said:Aside from the issue of commuters/non-revs, I think there's going to be a ripple effect with pax carry-ons, at least for the weight restricted operators (Dash-8, 1900s, etc.). Carry-ons weigh nothing (included in pax weight), carry-outs (ala carte) weigh 19 lbs. (at QX), checked bags weigh 30 lbs. If a significant number of people start checking everything, we're going to "lose" some seats.
Also, does anyone know how the airports/airlines/TSA are dealing with all the "contraband" currently sold on the secure side? The TSA directive says no liquids on aircraft. Does that mean all those vendors selling bottled water, duty-free liquor, soft drinks, lattes, and on and on can still sell them, but that gate agents somehow have to re-screen everyone's carry-ons for "contraband liquids" before boarding? Can I no longer get a Starbucks in the terminal during a break and bring it aboard? Are all those vendors going to quit selling banned liquids?
I can understand TSA not wanting liquids brought through security, but if all the same stuff is sold in the terminal, and carry-outs/purses/briefcases are still allowed, how can they expect contraband not to be brought on the aircraft. There's no way to effectively screen for it once a pax is on the secure side of the terminal.
I wonder how many in-flight security incidents we're going to have because Grandma bought a bottle of water while she was waiting in the terminal, which she put in her carry-on, then brought out during the flight.
ceo_of_the_sofa said:They ban Gatorade, hair gel and Head & Shoulders because of what can be sneaked in "inside" the bottle. Stuff sold "inside" security has allready been screened.
That's funny stuff. Pretty soon I'll have to leave my mentos and diet coke at home. I think they're on to the baking soda/vinegar bomb.ReverseSensing said:Just another knee-jerk, over-reaction by the Taking Shampoo Away brainiacs. This "component bomb" crap has been a threat for years. I swear TSA is trying its best to ruin the airline industry, with these half-baked, ill-conceived precautions.
Are they tasting every bottle of water that comes into the airport, and wanding all the muffins? Me thinks not.ceo_of_the_sofa said:Stuff sold "inside" security has allready been screened.