Commander 1000 vs. Conquest II....Which is better?
Conklin de Decker shows the economic operating stats are nearly identical.
The engines are the same, Garret -10's.
Conquest edges the Commander in most performance categories but by a very small margin.
I've had numerous in person, and written testimonials on how great the Commanders are. I have a bias toward a more rugged aircraft which I think the Commanders is..
Is the Conquest II supported well by Cessna? Service Centers?
Dispatch reliability?
Current or Past Operator/Pilot like and dislikes?
They seem to be asking an average of 200-500K cheaper on the aquisition price on Conquests IIs, is this be a wrong observation? Probably not a good sign since the Conquest 2 has a slightly bigger cabin and better performance numbers.
There seems to be no refurbing, i.e. "tip to tail" upgraded Conquest II like there are Commanders and if it not, I'm guessing its because of aircraft poor support?
Conklin de Decker shows the economic operating stats are nearly identical.
The engines are the same, Garret -10's.
Conquest edges the Commander in most performance categories but by a very small margin.
I've had numerous in person, and written testimonials on how great the Commanders are. I have a bias toward a more rugged aircraft which I think the Commanders is..
Is the Conquest II supported well by Cessna? Service Centers?
Dispatch reliability?
Current or Past Operator/Pilot like and dislikes?
They seem to be asking an average of 200-500K cheaper on the aquisition price on Conquests IIs, is this be a wrong observation? Probably not a good sign since the Conquest 2 has a slightly bigger cabin and better performance numbers.
There seems to be no refurbing, i.e. "tip to tail" upgraded Conquest II like there are Commanders and if it not, I'm guessing its because of aircraft poor support?
Last edited: