Cockpit nuke workers unite!

[The_Russian]

http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q941.html

Check it out. No one told me about this at work! Although I knew about it already. We should sue! When is the last time your airline provided radiation training?

 

[siucavflight]

I want hazard pay!

 

[The_Russian]

Me too!

 

[USMCmech]

Pilots exposure to solar radiation is higher than normal, but it's still far from a problem.

If you want to talk about health risks from a career as a pilot, a less than 1% increase in the odds of getting some kind of cancer is way down the list.

Heart disease from eating too much airport junk food and sitting in a chair almost all day getting little physical excercise is a much more lilkely problem.

 

[AirBadger]

So would an FO at GIA have to pay for hazard (PFH)?

I kid, I kid. Sort of.

 

[bocefus]

Surely the Russian would have known about radium on instrument dials, Antonov, Tupelov, Ilyushin, etc.

 

[The_Russian]

Lasts longer than cockpit lighting thats for sure!

 

[dmspilot00]

Pilots exposure to solar radiation is higher than normal, but it's still far from a problem.

You're right. Cosmic radiation is the problem.

 

[big_al]

a study just came out claiming that women were more likely to get breast cancer if they stayed up late at night or worked at night. something to do with the lighting that a human body is not used to getting at night when it wants to sleep. Anyway, I wonder if this also effects men, especially those pilot guys who fly at night.

 

[USMCmech]

Cosmic, solar, enviromental, same diff.

Having worked with industrial X-ray equipment for 8 years, I have been exposed to radiation levels 50 times what an airline pilot will recive durring a flight.

Quoting from that article in the first post

Even so, their exposures are generally no greater than half of the value which is permissible under the more strict European (compared with US) occupational standards. For male and female pilots, the primary risk of many years of exposure at these levels is the possibility of a small increase, about 1%, in their lifetime risk of cancer.

As I said before, that Big Mac is much more hazardous to your helath.

 

[FN FAL]

Pilots exposure to solar radiation is higher than normal, but it's still far from a problem.

If in fact you're asking about becoming a licensed pilot in the realm of "general aviation" rather than commercial flying, be assured that at the low altitudes used by private pilots in light aircraft the radiation risks are negligible.

Wrong, skin cancer from ultraviolet radiation is going to be a big problem for people who fly a lot in unpressurized aircraft with Plexiglas windows, whether the aviation operation is Title 14 CFR part 91, 105, 135 or whatever.

 

[Gorilla]

I've been banging that drum a long time. Pilots who retire from this type of flying either live to be 90 (They are protected by their own genes, I'm guessing) or you seem to read their obits at 63 and find they died from some really funky cancer, like "upper spine cancer", vs a more typical cancer.

Wink wink, don't ask, don't tell with radiation.

 

[Showtime]

The FAA has a site that lets you calculate the dose you got on a particular leg. I did a whole month and extrapolated that out for 30 years. I came up with about a 1 in 200 chance of death from cancer. Thats for long haul cargo.

 

[The_Russian]

Can you post a link to the radiation calculator?

 

[Showtime]

Here you go:

http://www.faa.gov/education_research/research/med_humanfacs/aeromedical/radiobiology/index.cfm

 

[Espalda Mojado]

http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q941.html

Check it out. No one told me about this at work! Although I knew about it already. We should sue! When is the last time your airline provided radiation training?

At Gulfstream Airlines , the B1900D radiation training package costs extra.

Hey, you can't just go to McDonalds and demand a free Supersize, either.

 

[Espalda Mojado]

If anybody wants to know more about this Russian and his PFT antics, I have compiled a video thread:

http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1039866#post1039866

 

[Hovernut]

Don't forget...there are therepeutic aspects to radiation exposure!! I'm much more disgruntled since I left the accelerator! CRJs just don't fly high enough for me to keep getting my fix

 

[USMCmech]

Here you go:

http://www.faa.gov/education_research/research/med_humanfacs/aeromedical/radiobiology/index.cfm

Having done a few sample flights on that calculator I am only able to respond to your health concerns thusly

".15 millirem over a 3 hour flight, that's all?"

That is literally nothing. Having lliterally recived 200 times that amount durring a month of shooting X-rays, I'm not really worried.

 

[Gorilla]

That is literally nothing. Having lliterally recived 200 times that amount durring a month of shooting X-rays, I'm not really worried.

That's a goofy analogy. Since you already chose to be exposed to large amounts of radiation via x-rays, comparing that to aircrew dosage is like saying "only a quart of Jack? Heck I drink 5 quarts a day." Well the 5 quarts is what's going to hurt you, not the one.

^^^^ Now THAT's a stupid analogy too. Oh well. You should be concerned about your x-ray exposure. The effects don't show up in 6 weeks, it can take years. Just because the "Govt says it's OK" doesn't make it so.

I cringe every time I see a TSA guy stick his arm inside one of the airport X-ray machines to retrieve a jammed-up tray. The other day, I kid you not, a lady loaded her POODLE into one of those gray x-ray trays. The dog began its journey into the machine calmly. About three of us in line went "N-OOOO-oooo! Don't do that!" and saved the dog.