Clearly you weren't viewed as a potential a$$-kisser.
"Clearly" you don't work at CS. I'd bet good money you don't work at Netjets either. Why weigh in when the only info you have is "clearly" heresay?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clearly you weren't viewed as a potential a$$-kisser.
First of all, Ms KL, aka "stock nazi", was NOT that well respected. If you were assigned to fly with her in the Bravo, you squirmed helplessly. Good luck to her and the people she flies with at SW. The Bravo pilots at CS are breathing easier tonight knowing they don't have to fly with her. Man, Clueless, you need to "get a clue", Kid.
If all you say is true, why is it that a couple of Bravo pilots contacted her recently to come over and have a visit on an overnight. How come so may have let her help them get on at SW. Everybody has their quirks. This lady was a true dedictated professional, just trying to life make better for everybody else. She would hold one accountable in the cockpit.
Maybe cause they have "small aircraft complex" and have to fly something HUGE, like the 737. We all know southwest is nothing more than an over accomplished regional. .
Ahhh they merit system.... Too bad didnt have to wait her turn by seniority.she was just an average stick that actually got farther than she should have at CS because of her mouth and personality. In the end, it was her mouth and personality that did her in.
Its all about attitude. If you get more than two calls, just remember more is not better.
Odds are they are sitting looking at you on paper liking what they say, but not liking what they hear over the phone. So they will call more to see if it improves...
Just my two cents
Makes that SWA selection process even more bizarre, if what u guys saying is true.
That's the way it is here. Keep your mouth shut, and do what you're told. Don't dare tell the upper management that things might not be all that great.
From what I've heard about the story, the lesson to be learned is to respect the chain of command.
True, but when the General ask you for information, do you say "sir, with all due respect, you need to go through the chain of command for me to respond"?
From what I know about the story, the General asked for information and she provided it. I am sure her immediate supervisor knew she was doing it.
...Now I know he did ask for it, but he was expecting to get information that had been passed up the pipe and ignored, not information that was with-held from everyone and then delivered to him.
Its hard to solve/ignore a problem when its never addressed as one. Which is why she got the reaction she did.
Her immediate supervisors all the way to JD, all felt that she didn't trust them to do their jobs, and I really can't blame them for feeling stabbed in the back.