rubberducky
RJ Gearbitch
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
- Posts
- 92
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's certainly some truth to that, although it shouldn't be that way. At any rate, the FSDO does not decide what is legal and waht is not. that is decided by the FAA counselkclark said:FAA view is going to change from each section of the country. Each FSDO has their own way of doing things.
THis is true, and it's an important point that shold be kept in mind when reading the FAQ. THere are some things in the FAQ which are just flat out wrong. This *particular* item in the FAQ is a direct verbatim quote of an interpretation from some office of regional counsel (Eastern region, I think), and as such it *IS* an official legal interpretation. Regional counsel is not "the FSDO", they answer to the office of chief counsel.kclark said:Technically that Part 61 FAQ is not legal interpretation. .
Well, actually it *does* specify pilot certificate. Furthermore when it says Pilot certificate, rating or operating privelige, it does mean pilot certificate, pilot rating or pilot operating privelige. Otherwise completing a 121 flight engineer PC (non pilot PC for non-pilot operating privelige) or adding an Airframe rating to your Mechanic's certificate would both count as a BFR.kclark said:Note is does not say 'pilot certificate'. There fore a BFR is not required if you earn your flight instructor certificate, or add a rating to that instructor certificate..
Try it this way:kclark said:A person who has within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, RATING, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
kclark said:Figured I'd post the reponse from the laywer.
"
An initial CFI applicant can use the checkride to count for the flight review, but it would be advisable to also have the examiner make the flight review endorsement in the airman's logbook as well, to ensure that they have "credit" for it.
It's the same problem as the wording in John Lynch's FAQ. "Yes, but you also need the endorsement" means the exact same thing as "No" but is just not worded as well.A Squared said:Not to pick nits, but your lawyer's advice is incorrect, or at least worded in a misleading manner