Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really cause they're the ones who decide whether or not to file a violation. Even if it later gets thrown out, it's still a major hassle.igneousy2 said:The local FSDO opinion counts almost as little as my opinion.
I believe you're emphasing the wrong term in the FAR. The key term is PILOT PROFICIENCY CHECK. The remainder of the reference merely mentions the different types of pilot proficiency checks that may be credited toward a flight review. A CFI check is not a pilot proficiency check and a flight instructor certificate or rating is not a pilot certificate or rating.kclark said:Still not response from the laywer.
A person who has within the perdio specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certifcate, RATING, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.
Now if you got to 14 CFR FAR Part 1 and look up the definition of rating.
Rating means a statement that, as part of a certificate, sets forth special conditions, privleges, or limitations.
.
It was about an IPC check, and there was some discussion about BFR as well, if you read the entire thread.transpac said:I believe you're emphasing the wrong term in the FAR. The key term is PILOT PROFICIENCY CHECK. The remainder of the reference merely mentions the different types of pilot proficiency checks that may be credited toward a flight review. A CFI check is not a pilot proficiency check and a flight instructor certificate or rating is not a pilot certificate or rating.
P.S. I thought the issue was an IPC???
There's certainly some truth to that, although it shouldn't be that way. At any rate, the FSDO does not decide what is legal and waht is not. that is decided by the FAA counselkclark said:FAA view is going to change from each section of the country. Each FSDO has their own way of doing things.
THis is true, and it's an important point that shold be kept in mind when reading the FAQ. THere are some things in the FAQ which are just flat out wrong. This *particular* item in the FAQ is a direct verbatim quote of an interpretation from some office of regional counsel (Eastern region, I think), and as such it *IS* an official legal interpretation. Regional counsel is not "the FSDO", they answer to the office of chief counsel.kclark said:Technically that Part 61 FAQ is not legal interpretation. .
Well, actually it *does* specify pilot certificate. Furthermore when it says Pilot certificate, rating or operating privelige, it does mean pilot certificate, pilot rating or pilot operating privelige. Otherwise completing a 121 flight engineer PC (non pilot PC for non-pilot operating privelige) or adding an Airframe rating to your Mechanic's certificate would both count as a BFR.kclark said:Note is does not say 'pilot certificate'. There fore a BFR is not required if you earn your flight instructor certificate, or add a rating to that instructor certificate..