Lazy8
Registered Parrot Head
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Posts
- 789
So far as lycoming vs. continental...lycomings haven't just been plagued with crank problems, with historically with valve train problems starting with the overhead camshaft and working out to the valve guides, with uneven oil distribution and wear being a comon issue at overhaul time.
I can attest to that. I've seen a brand new PA28R-201 with a Lycoming IO-360 get a stuck valve around 250 Tach. Blew oil out all over the place. Then it happened again around 600 tach. Bizarre to say the least since two new identical Arrows were purchased at the same time, both were equally used for flight training, and the other has never had the issue.
Out of about 50 other aircraft with IO-360's that's the only plane the problem occurred on in 5 years of flying them. (Granted they are not the all the exact same models, etc.) I wonder if it's just some inconsistencies in the manufacturing process.
But in regards to the subject at hand, I'd go for the 206. You can beat the crap out of them and they still keep on trucking along. Also, a Cessna rep told me there's never been a single occurrence of a single-engine Cessna break-up in flight; however, I've known of a few Saratogas lose the wing. ....and besides who really wants to be switching fuel tanks every 15 minutes