oilcanbland
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 84
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
avbug said:I prefer the full EFIS and Honeywell Primus Suite in the Cessna 152, over the basic steam gage setup in the 172. Further, the convenience and reliability of the turbojet engine makes it a far superior mount. Plus, it comes with it's own complimentary monkey...
The 172 offers standup convenience (for those too proud to sit on the lav), and the sex appeal of a larger, more stately ride at the FBO ramp.
For both, the executive appointment and reclining bucket seats with built in shiatzu massage fingers makes extended flights most enjoyable, while preserving one's look and attire for the inevitable worshippers waiting breathlessly at rampside upon one's return.
I'd give both a thumbs up.
tarp said:
The biggest difference will be the way you sit in the plane and comfort. The C-152 reminds me of British sports cars like MG-B’s and Triumph’s where you sit on the floor and move the pedals. The C-172 is opposite in that it reminds me of a Chrysler mini-van where you sit like you are in a kitchen chair.