Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

MOD Carbon Cub Solar Fuel Tank Covers?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

ve6yeq

FI Supporter
Joined
Dec 20, 2023
Posts
134
Type aircraft owned
2024 Carbon Cub EX-3
Base airport
CYTZ
Ratings
PPL (ASEL)
As I generally do not have the opportunity to hangar my Carbon Cub FX-3/EX-3, it is tied down outside with covers from Bruce's Custom Covers (Extended Canopy Cover, Cowling Cover, and Tire Covers). Although I have a Lithium-based EarthX ETX-900 main battery, which has minimal self-discharge and does not require float charging, the Lead-based PowerSonic AGM Ignition backup battery is designed for continuous float charging and requires more than 24 hours of charging to reach full capacity. Since I only fly for less than a couple of hours a week on average, the ignition backup battery never gets fully charged. To keep everything in top condition, I am thinking of getting a small portable solar panel, and charger.

Initially, I was thinking of just an external solar panel I could attach to the horizontal stabilizer when it was tied down, but then I remembered Mike Patey's videos on his "Scrappy" build, where he integrated flexible solar cells into the metal top surface of the wings. Although the Carbon Cub has mostly fabric wings, the metal wing fuel tank covers still offer a possible mounting location. Has anyone attempted this?
 
Here is Mike Patey's video on how he integrated solar panels into the metal wing skins:
 
An external solar panel would work fine I'd think but my concern is it getting blown into something causing damage to you or someone else's plane.

You could possibly find one that fits in the clear glass area over the cockpit but you mention using a cover so that's out.

I think I'd consider an external panel payment placed on top of your Bruce's cover on the aft top and strapped on securely?

Or do nothing and with your knowledge of the system you should be fine.

I'm not a fan of putting something on the wing and causing some cosmetic damage for little gain.
 
the Lead-based PowerSonic AGM Ignition backup battery is designed for continuous float charging and requires more than 24 hours of charging to reach full capacity.

I relied on 12 V AGM SLA batteries for about 30 years of sailplane racing. After each contest flight they were put on the charger in the evening and were fully charged the next morning.

My ignition battery current and voltage data seem to show that the 2 AH AGM in my FX-3 is fully charged soon after engine start. I also have current and voltage data for in flight intentional discharge tests that show rapid recovery to full charge.

What is the source of your claim they take over 24 hours to charge and what method was used for charging?
 
The idea of mounting a panel to the top of the Bruce's extended canopy cover might work and be very simple. If you take a flexible panel such as a BougeRV Arch Pro 100W N-Type TOPCon Flexible Solar Panel, which has mounting holes, and attach some small bungee cords with small hooks to the top of the cover.

IMG_0720.jpeg


The electrical changes to enable float charging for both the main battery and the ignition backup battery are simple: move the ignition battery breaker from the main bus to a direct connection to the main battery. The solar charger can then be connected directly to the main battery.
 
You could also just lean the seat forward and direct connect to the battery. Alligator clip type things.
 
I relied on 12 V AGM SLA batteries for about 30 years of sailplane racing. After each contest flight they were put on the charger in the evening and were fully charged the next morning.
Not all AGM batteries are built the same. Some are designed for deep-cycle use, such as your sailplane, and some are for float use and are damaged by deep discharging (e.g., emergency backups for main powered fire alarms). The PowerSonic PS-1221 is not a deep-cycle battery; it is a "general purpose" design, according to the datasheet.

My ignition battery current and voltage data seem to show that the 2 AH AGM in my FX-3 is fully charged soon after engine start. I also have current and voltage data for in flight intentional discharge tests that show rapid recovery to full charge.
The open circuit voltage climbs quickly, but a discharge test, such as running the right ignition from the battery during the run-up until the voltage stabilizes, shows a much lower voltage if I have not flown the plane recently, and after flying a lot.

Before leaving CYTZ (no flights in the last week and after an extended engine warmup due to airport congestion):
1770336027644.png


And after flying a lot (about 15 hours in the previous 48 hours):
1770336144497.png


What is the source of your claim they take over 24 hours to charge and what method was used for charging?
Figure 14, from the PowerSonic Technical Manual for Sealed Lead-Acid Batteries shows a typical charging performance for a changing voltage of 14.1 Vdc (close to the 14.0 Vdc that I observe).

1770336766263.png


(The only logical units for the x-axis is in hours as a 100% discharge must charge at 0.1C for a minimum of 10 hours if the battery were ideal)
 
You could also just lean the seat forward and direct connect to the battery. Alligator clip type things.
No need - I have a battery charging pigtail that I use for the AC charger that I can also just connect a solar charger to.
 
Not all AGM batteries are built the same. Some are designed for deep-cycle use, such as your sailplane,

I never used deep cycle batteries. I used a lot of different types over the years but they were all similar general purpose batteries and often advertised as suitable to alarm systems.

I retired from sailplane racing a while ago but I still have the last pair I used. They are UB1280 (12 V, 8 AH).
 
I too had studied the PowerSonic Technical Manual and it is the reason I abandoned in flight discharge testing to confirm ignition battery capacity.

The aircraft charging circuit provides no current limiting and the charge current after a 30 minute discharge test was well over the maximum allowed charge current.

I expect I have the only FX-3 with ignition battery current monitoring. In the emergency ignition test the current is about -1.1 A. When the test terminates the battery charges for a few seconds at 0.8 A then quickly settles to 0.1 A to 0.2 A for the rest of the flight.

If the battery draws 0.1 A at 14.1 V I think it is charged.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom