Oh-ryan
Occasional User
- Joined
- May 13, 2004
- Posts
- 534
I agree with you on their actions once they landed but not their choice to land in the first place. This has been openly debated within Naval Aviation and I know it's controversial. Nonetheless, the decision to land that in China instead of ditch in the sea (knowing full well that there may be fatalities) is one I don't agree with. That airplane is just too dang sensitive to give to the Chinese. It was some ballsy flying to get it on deck but the wrong decision. Shane Osborne's book, Born to Fly also made me a bit nauseous.
I agree with you. That is why in my original post I carefully stated that they did everything right when in captivity. The debate continues about whether or not they should have allowed themselves to become captives in the first place. Many navy squadrons involved in those missions today are specifically directed to "put her in the drink" if ever placed in a similar situation.
Also agree about Shane's book though I don't blame him one bit for doing it. Some publishing company threw a bunch of money at him and probably had someone else write the majority of it for him. I would do the same thing, but the "gayest" thing about the book was that hokey photo on the cover with him wearing a command ball cap and the pig taking off in the background.
Last edited: