Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Can anyone end epic flight delays at NYC airports?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

JonnyKnoxville

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
439
Can anyone end epic flight delays at NYC airports?
The Associated Press
June 18, 2007


When it comes to getting people to places on time, no airports in the country have done a worse job this year than New York's.
Between January and April, 38% of all flights at Newark Liberty, John F. Kennedy and LaGuardia were either late or canceled, leading to disruptions nationwide.
And when planes were late, they were really late.
Folks unlucky enough to be on one of the 15,480 delayed flights from Newark left the ground an average 95 minutes after their scheduled departure time, according to federal figures. The 14,752 late arrivals at LaGuardia were, on average, an hour tardy.
Those statistics come as no surprise to air travelers. Scenes of delayed passengers sleeping on terminal floors, or sitting endlessly on parked planes, have become weekly occurrences.
The question is, can anyone fix it?
A variety of government agencies and aviation experts will take their best shot at the problem in the coming months, including a high-level task force convened by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
The group will include airline executives, state officials and other experts, and will study, among other things, ways to maximize runway use and get planes in and out more quickly.
More than easy travel to and from New York is at stake. The city's airports are a vital cog in the nation's aviation network, and bad delays here have a habit of rippling far and wide.
"This impacts the entire country," said JetBlue CEO Dave Barger, a task force member. As goes Kennedy, he quipped, so goes the nation.
Experts say the panel's job won't be easy. A variety of uncontrollable factors handicap New York's airports from the get-go.
Bad weather and bad geography are two of them. Minor storms that wouldn't be a problem elsewhere often block New York flights because of where the city sits on the eastern seaboard.
The airports have outdated runway configurations, meaning they can land fewer jets per hour than modern facilities like the ones in Atlanta and Denver.
Air congestion is at an all-time high. Nearly 1.4 million flights passed through the region's airspace last year, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.
"If an airport is scheduled at maximum capacity all day, and you have delays at any time, you can never recover from it," said R. John Hansman, director of MIT's International Center for Air Transportation.
Yet there is room for improvement, experts said.
The FAA is finalizing approval of a new flight pattern for the crowded corridor between Delaware and Connecticut. Officials hope the reconfiguration can slash delays by 200,000 hours a year. The plan faces opposition from some communities that lie in the path of the new jet routes.
The airlines and FAA are pushing Congress to authorize a multibillion-dollar upgrade of the nation's air traffic control system. Its high-tech replacement would use global-positioning satellites to coordinate traffic, allowing aircraft to fly closer together.
"We need to get away from this 1930s radar navigation system," said David Castelveter, a spokesman for the Air Transport Association. The hurdle is the system's cost and timeliness. It wouldn't be available everywhere until at least 2025.
Building more runways would be the best solution, but it might be impossible in New York, where the existing major airports are out of space. In lieu of that, the Port Authority is purchasing Stewart International Airport, 60 miles north of the city.
It could handle 1.5 million passengers annually, up from about 300,000 last year. That extra capacity would draw away only a small percentage of the region's air travelers, but every little bit helps, officials said.
Talks are underway over various schemes that would encourage airlines to fly bigger planes out of LaGuardia, which would allow the airport to move more people in less time. Smaller, regional jets have proliferated because they allow airlines to fly more frequently and with fewer empty seats. Airlines say passengers like the change because it has given them more flight options and lower fares.
Airlines should also be encouraged to "schedule with integrity," JetBlue's Barger said. Some, he said, now make a habit of trying to cram too many flights into too short a time, creating delays because they can't move planes quickly enough.
All of those changes have the potential to help, experts said. But passengers shouldn't expect things to get much better anytime soon.
The reason: More people are flying. The FAA is predicting the country's major airports could be dealing with more than 81 million takeoffs and landings a year by 2020, up from about 62.5 million now.
"We're going to have pretty severe delays, no matter what," said Hansman. "If all of the technologies that people are working on were to come to fruition, that would give us maybe a 30% or 50% improvement, but it still won't give us what we need."
So brace yourself, New York.
The city's airports handled more than 100 million passengers last year. By 2025, the number is expected to reach 150 million.





Yep...Close La Gaurdia, bull-doze JFK, and build DFW or ATL on its old location plus maybe another parallel or so. Problem solved...the cost 1 tttrrrriillllliiion dollars.
 
At least some airport finally took the heat off ORD. Where on time schedules go to die.
 
Can anyone end epic flight delays at NYC airports?

No.

Maybe they should try only letting 50-seat or larger aircraft into the NYC Metros, especially during peak times. If the market is so small it can only support a 1900, maybe it doesn't need to operate into one of the most congested airports in the U.S.

Maybe my airline in particular could give us enough gate space to handle the scheduled number of flights. The airports should fine everyone $1,000/hour for each airplane stranded on a taxiway without a gate. Maybe then we'd schedule sensibly....
 
No.

Maybe they should try only letting 50-seat or larger aircraft into the NYC Metros, especially during peak times. If the market is so small it can only support a 1900, maybe it doesn't need to operate into one of the most congested airports in the U.S.

Maybe my airline in particular could give us enough gate space to handle the scheduled number of flights. The airports should fine everyone $1,000/hour for each airplane stranded on a taxiway without a gate. Maybe then we'd schedule sensibly....


I agree wholeheartedly.....a 767 and an E145 get the same runway for the same time......flights like ILM-LGA and GSP-LGA(for example) should not be taking up runway space. Now, figure in the Chautauqua, comair, and eagle are ALL doing these types of flights all day it adds to congestion. My suggestion.......get all the small and mid sized cities to send the pax to CVG, CLT, PIT, where there are WAY less delays even with Wx, and connect to a 757 or 767 to LGA.
 
The Soloution:

How about a high-speed rail between JFK, LGA, and EWR. All international flights in and out of JFK, long-haul, major carriers, and corporate aircraft out of LGA, and everyone else out of EWR. Problem solved. NEXT?

It's tough being God's gift to aviation.

Shy
 
Last edited:
How about a high-speed rail between JFK, LGA, and EWR. All international flights in and out of JFK, long-haul, major carriers, and corporate aircraft out of LGA, and everyone else out of EWR. Problem solved. NEXT?

It's tough being God's gift to aviation.

Shy

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ That's why.

What's up with Eagle running almost hourly ERJ's between there and BOS / DCA. That's a good place to start cutting down on the crap there.

My opinion is with the exception of a few regional flights to places that need them, the smallest airplane at LGA should be a 757.
 
No.

Maybe they should try only letting 50-seat or larger aircraft into the NYC Metros, especially during peak times. If the market is so small it can only support a 1900, maybe it doesn't need to operate into one of the most congested airports in the U.S.

Maybe my airline in particular could give us enough gate space to handle the scheduled number of flights. The airports should fine everyone $1,000/hour for each airplane stranded on a taxiway without a gate. Maybe then we'd schedule sensibly....

The vast majority of the traffic IS 50 seat and larger... Emphasis on the 50 seats. The Dashes and 1900s account for a very small percentage of the total traffic count. 50 seat RJ's account for a far greater number of takeoffs and landings.

The flying public is going to have to understand at some point that flying to a point close to the center of the NYC megatropolis comes with a price: Money and lack of scheduling flexibility. Reducing the number of flights and increasing the minimum average seat capacity floor are the only ways to reduce delays in the near term.

It occurs to me that a very expensive fix of LGA and JFK is the only real long term solution. Until you have more pavement, you can't increase capacity.
 
Statements from the FAA that have been published in news papers recently the problem is not with the airlines. It is those damn G/A aircraft! You know all those Cessna's that keep jamming up the airspace. Lets not even discuss the international playboys in their ultra expensive corporate jets.
That kind of head in the sand thinking is why the FAA is having such a hard time keeping things running.
 
The funny thing is that by train you could get from manhattan to SWF in not much more time than it takes to get to LGA. If you built a direct line to SWF the time would be close to the same.

Imagine if the folks out in Islip had approved a new terminal being built on the north side of of McAurthur airport with a direct connection to the LI Expressway and LI Railroad station.

Imagine if the folks in HPN had the foresight to build their new terminal with four or five more gates.

It all adds up.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top