Can a CFII give inst. training in a multi?

[minitour]

Thanks mini, after some time searching Order 8700, I found it. It's in Chapter 11, Section 8 if anyone needs it as a reference. It pretty much resolves my issues.

No problem...since beginning to deal with 141 & 135 certification, I've become very VERY comfy with FAA Order 8700...VERY comfy.... *sigh*

-mini

 

[flyer172r]

Thanks mini, after some time searching Order 8700, I found it. It's in Chapter 11, Section 8 if anyone needs it as a reference. It pretty much resolves my issues.

SVCTA- yeah, you could just do safety pilot, but safety pilots don't get paid. Even though its crap pay, when you're flight instructing, you earn something

Has anyone ever tried charging for being a safety pilot? Could be interesting to try out.

 

[acaTerry]

A better question would be WHY WOULD you do this? Unless you have some reasonable multi experience and proficient in engine out procedures (this does NOT mean someone has 10 hrs multi and passed a checkride), then you are taking risks that you may regret later as you scream for help when the pilot loses control and you are left holding the bag.

 

[siucavflight]

Yes you can. And no you do not want to have to explain it on an interview.

 

[minitour]

Yes you can. And no you do not want to have to explain it on an interview.

I'm a little fuzzy on why you'd have to explain something that the regulations and FAA Order 8700 both allow? Is that a place you'd really want to work?

-mini

 

[Pilot Doc]

From John Lynch (FAA big cheese) per an email to me dated 10/5/2004:

3. The person must have logged at least 5 hours PIC flight time in a Cessna 310."

61.195(f) Training received in a multiengine airplane, a helicopter, or a
powered-lift. A flight instructor may not give training required for the
issuance of a certificate or rating in a multiengine airplane, a
helicopter, or a powered-lift unless that flight instructor has at least
5 flight hours of pilot-in-command time in the specific make and model
of multiengine airplane, helicopter, or powered-lift, as appropriate.

I have previously assumed that an IPC doesn't fall under "required for the issuance of a certificate or rating." Did your source explain this?

 

[JediNein]

I have previously assumed that an IPC doesn't fall under "required for the issuance of a certificate or rating." Did your source explain this?

I was so happy to get the investigation over with that I did not question either Fed on the interpretation. If you want to followup with Mr. Lynch, go for it.

Fly SAFE!
Jedi Nein