enigma
good ol boy
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 2,279
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes it was. I got tired of waiting and just DVR'd (tivo) the news so that I could watch it this morning.English said:Is it the Bushmaster crash at FUL? Do a search on Flyin Tony, he posted info on that over the weekend.
The co-pilot WAS ejected during the crash . . . that is, he was found, strapped into his seat, outside of the cockpit. Even so, he was still obscured from plain view until the flames of the ensuing fire were extinguished.enigma said:Yes it was. I got tired of waiting and just DVR'd (tivo) the news so that I could watch it this morning.
Ya'll will love this. The announcer said that the pilot had to be pulled from the burning wreckage, but that the co-pilot had EJECTED before the crash. LOL
thanks English,
enigma
Tony, being the grammer guru that you are, I'd think that you'd appreciate the difference between "was ejected" and "ejected". Believe me, this local TV station only ran the story (one or two days after the fact) because they had graphic video, there was no news value. They just needed a crash and burn story to tease the late local news. After listening to it again, I'm certain that the anchor meant that the pilot ejected, as in pulled the red handle on purpose.TonyC said:The co-pilot WAS ejected during the crash . . . that is, he was found, strapped into his seat, outside of the cockpit. Even so, he was still obscured from plain view until the flames of the ensuing fire were extinguished.
Not ejected in the sense of the automatic seats with rockets and handles, but ejected like people are from automobile crashes.
Yes, indeed. That's why I emphasized that pesky little three-letter word (was) in my post. I thought perhaps that word might have been used in the news story, but missed. Since you've got the news program recorded, you have the luxury of reviewing what was said, and I certainly won't argue with THAT!enigma said:Tony, being the grammer guru that you are, I'd think that you'd appreciate the difference between "was ejected" and "ejected". Believe me, this local TV station only ran the story (one or two days after the fact) because they had graphic video, there was no news value. They just needed a crash and burn story to tease the late local news. After listening to it again, I'm certain that the anchor meant that the pilot ejected, as in pulled the red handle on purpose.
regards,
enigma