Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Business Aircraft Hush Kits

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

mzaharis

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
541
Dumb newbie question #3:

What business aircraft require hush kits, and for which aircraft are they desirable/economically worthwhile? I've read of G IIs and G IIIs needing hush kits to meet Stage 3 noise requirements, as well as some of the old Lear 20 family, but do other aircraft need them to meet Stage 3 requirements?

Are there any business aircraft that can't meet even Stage 2?

If you have a Stage 2 aircraft, what operational limitations does that impose (airport unavailibility or curfews)? How about if you aren't Stage 2 compliant?
 
Let's see... the REAL loud ones... you mentioned the G-IIs and the old Lears... what about Falcon 20s or Sabreliners? Maybe Jetstars as well?
 
RipCurl said:
Let's see... the REAL loud ones... you mentioned the G-IIs and the old Lears... what about Falcon 20s or Sabreliners? Maybe Jetstars as well?
Let's not forget the early Viper-powered Hawkers. After the first of the year, when DRVSM becomes effective, there will be a bunch of those old airframes retired - too costly to equip for RVSM and too inefficient to fly at FL280 and below. RVSM - a prime example of the tail wagging the dog.

'Sled
 
Lead Sled said:
Let's not forget the early Viper-powered Hawkers. After the first of the year, when DRVSM becomes effective, there will be a bunch of those old airframes retired - too costly to equip for RVSM and too inefficient to fly at FL280 and below. RVSM - a prime example of the tail wagging the dog.

'Sled
So, in other words, since aircraft that are non-stage3 compliant are probably also non-RVSM compliant, and it isn't worth the cost to upgrade them to RVSM, they'll be scrapped, anyway, so it isn't worth the cost of STC'ing hushkits for them - right?
 
mzaharis said:
So, in other words, since aircraft that are non-stage3 compliant are probably also non-RVSM compliant, and it isn't worth the cost to upgrade them to RVSM, they'll be scrapped, anyway, so it isn't worth the cost of STC'ing hushkits for them - right?
In aviation, it's seldom appropriate to use the words never, always, all, none, etc. There are plenty of aircraft like "most" G-IIs and IIIs that the owners are economically justified in modifying their aircraft. Along those same lines, there are probably quite a few older Lears, Hawkers, Jet Commanders, etc. where it won't be deemed economically viable to mod them and they will be retired.

'Sled
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom