I surely can; a considerable amount. I've been contacted by the author of the book directly about the same thing, and I'll be forwarding things to him, too.
I'm not criticising the book. It's obvious a lot of work went into the book, but it's not by any means complete, and not completely accurate. It's a good reference, but it's not authoritative. It shouldn't be treated as such.
As an example, in Chapter 9, page 340, "NASA Reports." An important piece of information not included is that the title bar of the report can be used against you. The body cannot, but if the FAA learns of your offense, or if you admit to an offense in the title of the ASRS report as you submit it, that is fair game, and it may be used against you. A title such as "altitude deviation" may be used against you, vs. "altitude event." This isn't often discussed or shared. But it's important. It's also important to note that while the ASRS report can't be used against you, the FAA can still use the report to go in search of other information to use against you...thus making limiting certain information in the body of the report or the title of the report advantageous to the submitter.
On the same page, CFR 91.13 is given very little treatment, even though it's the basis of a large share of the enforcement action taken against pilots. In fact, among other charges, it's often a common thread. We should have some reference to understand that actually endangering the life or property of another isn't necessary; simply acting in a manner that might, may still qualify. Further, even if there is no life or property to endanger, this paragraph may still be used in enforcement action against you, and your own life and the airplane as property may also be used against you. This is important information to know.
A page later, we find in Chapter 9 under what to do if involved in an enforcement action, in paragraph 4, the advice to not trust your interpretation of the regulations, but find several high time pilots who really know the regulations. This paragraph is dangerous and misleading...as I find that flight time means nothing with respect to knowledge of the regulation, and many experienced pilots have a gross misunderstanding of the regulations. (Shoot, one Director of Operations of a large 135 operation, a very experienced pilot with a lifetime of flying 135 121, and military behind him, tried to tell me once that he interpreted the regulations better than anyone, including the FAA, because, and I quote, "I wrote the regulations when I was in the army.").
The only thing that an individual about to be involved in enforcement action needs to know, with respect to Paragraph 4, is to call an attorney. However, paragraph 4 suggests "...Or find an aviation lawyer who really knows the regulations...". It's not a matter of or. It's necessary in many cases to the lifeblood of a career. It's sort of like saying, that if you're injured, you could find someone who has been injured a lot who can give some advice, ...or find a doctor.
Page 366 defines mineral and AD oil, but fails to note that not all AD oil is mineral oil, or that mineral oil is often used for routine flight other than breakin...or that mineral oil isn't necessary for break-in.
Page 465 talks about preventative maintenance, but doesn't dwell on the most important aspects...that it must be done using the same tools, same standards, same performance level, as any certificated mechanic, and must be done using current publications, just as though a certificated mechanic were doing the work...the owner/operator/pilot performing this work is equally responsible for the work, including all of Part 43, as well as industry standards as applicable, such as AC 43.13, and all specifics set forth in approved publications and data regarding the appliance, aircraft, or component.
Another very important point mentioned by quote, but not expanded upon, is the matter that preventative maintenance cannot involve complex assembly operations. One may be mislead to believe that what is outlined here, and in Appendix A of part 43, is easily doable by an owner, pilot, etc. It's very often not...important stuff to know as it affects one's certificate, and the airworthiness of the aircraft. Something as simple as an oil change may result in the need for AD compliance on the oil filter adapter nut, safety wire proceedures to a certain standard (how many twists of wire should exist in the pigtail, and what is the standard?), the requirement for a current, calibrated torque wrench for the filter and drain plug, the availability of a current referencable maintenance manual for the aircraft AND engine (two different, independent sources), etc. This really should be noted.
There's a plethora of these things; I'm just skipping through at random. I'm not saying one shouldn't buy the book. Do; it's a good, concise reference that is quite inclusive. But don't use that as a primary reference to protect one's certificate. That's a big risk to undertake, and not a good bet. There's more to know than what is in the book. Know the regulation or principle or material, and then use a book such as review reference...but not your primary source to learn the material. There is more under the sun than what lies between it's covers.
I don't have time right now to really dive into it, and I'll be submitting my information to the author per his request (which I was going to do, anyway, as professional courtesy).
My impression in reading comments here and elsewhere is that pilots find the book highly authoritative and exhaustively comprehensive based on the fact that it has expanded their understanding. That's good and well, and as it should be...so long as those pilots realize that there is still more, and not to let their search for understanding end with the purchase of this book.