Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Boeing loses tanker deal to EADs-Northrop Grumman

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Swass

So long, America.....
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Posts
2,015
Boeing loses tanker to Northrop Grumman-EADS team

BY MOLLY MCMILLIN

The Wichita Eagle


Boeing Co. was passed over today in the battle for a multibillion-dollar aerial tanker contract, Sen. Pat Roberts told The Eagle.
The Department of Defense selected a bid from the team of Northrop Grumman and EADS, the parent company of Airbus, over Boeing to provide the Air Force with a new fleet of refueling tankers, Roberts said.
Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute, a Washington, D.C. -based organization said he was told the same thing by "authoritative government sources."
Boeing’s Wichita facility would have housed a finishing center to assemble and test the tankers. That was expected to create 300 to 500 jobs.
The contract also was expected create another 500 jobs with local suppliers, including Spirit AeroSystems.
Overall, the economic impact to Kansas would have been about 3,800 jobs and $14 million a year, Roberts and U.S. Rep. Todd Tiahrt said last month.
The new tankers are vital, Air Force officials say. By the end of the decade, the Air Force’s current fleet of 531 KC-135 and 59 KC-10 aircraft will reach an average age of 50 years old.
In choosing the KC-30 tanker — based on the Airbus A330 commercial airliner — the Air Force chose a larger airplane than Boeing’s offering, which was based on the 767 commercial airliner.
Experts expect Boeing to file a protest.
 
Experts expect Boeing to file a protest.

Good! What happened to the AMERICAN military buying an AMERICAN airplane? This airbus $h!t should stay in europe!:angryfire
 
any one think the 330 will have a service life of 50 years like the 135?
 
The tanker is a critical strategic asset to the country. I suppose it is fine to give that contract to the lowest bidder; as long as you feel that you can count on the French to support us in time of war.
 
Good! What happened to the AMERICAN military buying an AMERICAN airplane? This airbus $h!t should stay in europe!:angryfire

Reminds me of when the Coast Guard went with the Falcon 20 instead of the Sabreliner 80...pretty much ending the production run of the Sabre...
 
I don't feel bad for Boeing.
They got called on their leasing scam. Screw them.

(not an Airbus fan either)

CE
 
Wow 1900 troops... as opposed to 73,000 US troops participating just in the Normandy invasion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Normandy

maybe this will put it in perspective:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_American_Cemetery_and_Memorial


that s not the point.
it it were, you' d be mentioning the lack of support from:
Great britain:6000
Canada: 2500
Denmark:640
india:200
etc....

There are around 300 million people in the USA.
about 60 million in UK 60 million in France
6 million in Denmark,etc....
Do you see a trend?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top