Boeing 757

[Flyer1015]

You notice those aircraft were FLOWN to a safe landing? You're airbus pops a few CB's and you're just a passenger.

And what Airbus accident is this referring to?

 

[Flyer1015]

I'll take a rudder hard over vs. the tail coming off over Jamaica Bay.

The tail came off for a reason. Have you ever slammed any control surface in FULL deflection, right left right left right? I have never. You have 1 FO who severely overreacted to wake turbulence ALWAYS by using the rudder. Introducing severe side load does no good to help a roll rate caused by wake turbulence at 250 kts. He did full opposite deflections 5 times before it snapped. Lets not blame the Airbus for that one. I agree with the NTSB's final conclusion, no matter how much it "hurts."

 

[Dornier 335]

You notice those aircraft were FLOWN to a safe landing? You're airbus pops a few CB's and you're just a passenger.

You're obviously not familiar with the mechanical backup mode. What sort of kills an Airbus is the same that kills e.g. a DC-10, total loss of hydraulic systems. Not sure if the same applies to Boeings.

P.S. btw it's your airbus not you're airbus. :smash:

 

[The Victors]

You're obviously not familiar with the mechanical backup mode. What sort of kills an Airbus is the same that kills e.g. a DC-10, total loss of hydraulic systems. Not sure if the same applies to Boeings.

P.S. btw it's your airbus not you're airbus. :smash:

Oh good burn on the grammar.....pretty interesting how defensive you airbi boys are getting. Maybe it's because deep down you know I'm right.

 

[Dornier 335]

Oh good burn on the grammar.....pretty interesting how defensive you airbi boys are getting. Maybe it's because deep down you know I'm right.

Deep down I know that you have no knowledge about the Airbus. Why don't you take a look at the links I posted.

 

[BrickTop]

In my opinion this plane is one of the best ever built. Why did Boeing not create a next gen version of this? The 737900 is such a dog and will never live up to the 757. It seems like a 757 with new engines would be a great plane

Contintntal approached Boeing years ago asking to re-open the 757 production line and to develop a modern day version of the aircraft. Boeing refused. Their answer; "We are committed to the 787 program." That plastic pile of sh!t has cost them their Legacy.

 

[SIG600]

The only thing missing from this thread is a Nazi comparison and it will have gone full re-tard.

 

[The Drizzle]

The only thing missing from this thread is a Nazi comparison and it will have gone full re-tard.

Llike the Nazi regime, I feel the Airbus computers stepping on my neck with electronic jack-boots.

does that work for you?

 

[Chronic Jetlag]

IMO Boeing was ran by engineers but now bean counters, that's why the 75 was discontinued.

 

[NEDude]

Not necessarily.

Correct, the rudder hard over resulted in two crashes, the rudder loss only resulted in one.

 

[say again]

Oh good burn on the grammar.....pretty interesting how defensive you airbi boys are getting. Maybe it's because deep down you know I'm right.

Yeaaahhhhh, that's it! Looks like you were the 1st one to throw a jab at the Airbus, and it was quite lame BTW. But I guess sticking up for your superior Boeing helps you sleep at night.... BTW- I couldn't care less whether I fly one or the other... my d!ck isn't that small.

 

[SpauldingSmails]

I assume you are making a slight at Airbus. The 777 and 787 are fly-by-wire. Do pilots "fly" them?

If I'm in cruise for 10+ hrs, I couldn't give a rats ass about being Chuck Yeager. It's all about quiet and comfort.

There's at least a couple former pilots that wouldn't fight your assessment about the quiet and comfortable flight deck of an airbus.

ZZZZZZZzzzzzzzZZZZZZzzzzzzzz

 

[Scrapdog]

The 757-300 is supposedly the biggest money-maker at Delta on a per seat basis (RASM-CASM.)

My only complaint about the airplane is that, as with all Boeings, the cockpit is just too damn loud. Oh, and there's a yoke. Other than it's a pilot's airplane.

Oh, and it's an airliner that flies straight and level in the mid 30s at 0.8M. Rotate, auto-pilot on, WSJ out. Wash, rinse, repeat...737, 757, 777, etc

 

[Scrapdog]

I assume you are making a slight at Airbus. The 777 and 787 are fly-by-wire. Do pilots "fly" them?

If I'm in cruise for 10+ hrs, I couldn't give a rats ass about being Chuck Yeager. It's all about quiet and comfort.

And? The F-16 is fly by wire, and yes we "fly them."

 

[GogglesPisano]

And? The F-16 is fly by wire, and yes we "fly them."

You've helped me make my point. Just because its FBW doesn't mean the pilot doesn't fly it.

 

[Dornier 335]

And? The F-16 is fly by wire, and yes we "fly them."

So is the E190 with a yoke...

 

[xjhawk]

I hate to pipe in....

There is something to be said about how comfortable the flight deck is.

There is also something to be said about one being American made while the other one is not.

Comfort (passengers)-I have only ever been on one comfortable ride in a 757 and that was the one time I had an exit row by myself. Other than that-I would say its rather tight. But I know that is purely the airlines seat placement.

I will now comment on which one I think is cool looking-Boeings definitely win on that category. With the exception being the A330, they are all rather ugly when compared to Boeings.

Whoever said it was right. Its a wash when comparing safety.

 

[Scrapdog]

So is the E190 with a yoke...

What's an E190?

What's a yoke?

 

[Flyer1015]

I hate to pipe in....

There is something to be said about how comfortable the flight deck is.

There is also something to be said about one being American made while the other one is not.

Comfort (passengers)-I have only ever been on one comfortable ride in a 757 and that was the one time I had an exit row by myself. Other than that-I would say its rather tight. But I know that is purely the airlines seat placement.

I will now comment on which one I think is cool looking-Boeings definitely win on that category. With the exception being the A330, they are all rather ugly when compared to Boeings.

Whoever said it was right. Its a wash when comparing safety.

Airbus will soon have a factory in the USA to produce Airbus products right here (A320 family). So then it will be made in the USA. As for looks, I think the A320 looks better than the 737. The 737 looks ok, but the A320 design/shape is better. The 737 narrows the fuselage towards the cockpit area, whereas Airbus keeps it open and then meets it at the flight deck, resulting in a much larger cockpit. Also, the 737 engine positions on the wings and ground clearance require the engines to be more flat and it ruins the engine shape. From an aesthetic standpoint, that looks like a flaw. The Airbus ground clearance is great and the engines are nice and round as they should be.

 

[Draginass]

The 757 is a great pilot's airplane . . . . and a lousy, cramped, slave-ship for passengers. Just awful. Same for the 737, another outdated stretched slave-ship.

The A320, while a POS to fly, at least provides a relatively comfortable passenger cabin.