BFR Question

[bobbysamd]

Military pilots

1) If I take the Mil Comp test for my Instrument, Commercial and Multi-Engine certifications, does this wave the BFR requirement per the "new pilot rating" stuff?

Flight reviews are a currency requirement and not a certification issue. Isn't Mil Comp just an FAA written exam with no flying involved? Once you take that written and present your credentials to FSDO, you leave with a Commercial-Instrument certificate and equivalent ratings to your military quals. There has to be a flight(s) involved for an activity to count as a flight review.

2) Can my AF checkrides count to cover the BFR requirement?

Military pilots operate under their own currency and certification rules and not the FARs. If your AF IP or check pilot is also an FAA-certificated CFI, he/she could sign off an AF checkride in your civilian logbook as a flight review.

 

[bigsky]

It seems obvious that was an oversight on the part of whoever wrote the regulation..... Amazes me that a checkride for one of the most difficult ratings doesnt accomplish that, although a joy ride with a 50 hour instructor does. I would think someone loke AOPA could petition to change this.

 

[avbug]

The matter is really quite straight forward. Passing the practical test for a flight instructor certificate isn't passing the test for a PILOT certificate. It's passing the test for a teaching certificate.

The flight instructor certificate is far from the most difficult certificate to get. It may seem that way if you're new to flying and this is another hurdle for you, but it's nothing more than a glorified commercial pilot ride with some teaching questions...bearing in mind that the emphasis is on teaching, and not flying.

You can instruct without flight currency and without a current medical certificate...your instructor certificate isn't about flying. It's about teaching.

A flight review is about flying...not teaching. Get it?

 

[rainman_02]

Re: Military pilots

Re: bobbysamd

§61.56 Flight review.

(d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.

The way I read §61.56(d), I do not need flight reviews while I am actively flying for the AF and have a checkride within every 24 months.

Am I interpreting this statement wrong?

 

[bobbysamd]

14 CFR 61.56(d)

§61.56 Flight review.

(d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.

The way I read §61.56(d), I do not need flight reviews while I am actively flying for the AF and have a checkride within every 24 months.

Am I interpreting this statement wrong?

You have a point. I would be sure to have your AF CP or IP write it up in your civilian logbook, though.

 

[BradG]

From the FAQ section on the Summit CD:
QUESTION: The particular question is whether a flight instructor who passes a flight instructor practical test (for initial issuance or a CFI rating addition or for a reinstatement) is or is not exempt from needing a § 61.56 Flight Review for the next two years, since the reg. specifically says PILOT proficiency check.” § 6l.56 d - allows this exemption for a person who has"... passed a PILOT proficiency check.." not needing to accomplish a flight review for the next 2 years.

ANSWER: Ref. § 61.56(d); If the examiner also evaluates the applicant’s piloting skills then YES, “. . . a flight instructor practical test (for initial issuance or a CFI rating addition or for a reinstatement) . . .” would meet the requirements of a § 61.56 Flight Review. However, to make sure the applicant gets credit for successful completion of the Flight Review, the examiner should record that the § 61.56 Flight Review was satisfactorily completed in the applicant’s logbook.

§ 61.56(d) states:

(d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section.




So technically, yes it count as a BFR, although do to different interpretations by different FSDO's, it would be a good idea to get the sign off.

 

[avbug]

Brad,

This has been discussed already. It does NOT count as a flight review. The FAQ site is non regulatory. Further, John Lynch and Allen Pinkston have stated in this particular answer that it does NOT count as a flight review.

It may meet the requirements of a flight review if the pilot's skills have been evaluated. However, to qualify, the appropriate endorsement MUST be placed in the applicant's logbook, specifically showing completion of a flight review.

This is a universal, unequivocal requirement, and has nothing to do with the whim of an individual FSDO. Obtaining the logbook endorsement is not a good idea, it's mandatory in the case of a flight instructor initial practical test or reinstatement. The reinstatement does not count for a flight review, but the invidivual administering the flight review may provide the appropriate endorsement certifying that a flight review has been accomplished. This endorsement is a separate and distinct function from the practical test itself. The practical test does NOT count for a flight review, but may be combined with or used toward a flight review if the pilot's skills have been evaluated, and the appropriate endorsement is received.