Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Be Wary about Midwest's takeover by Northwest

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Eagle757shark

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Posts
575
Be wary about Midwest's takeover by Northwest

By JAY SORENSEN


Posted: Jan. 6, 2008

I believe within four years, Midwest Airlines will cease to exist as an independent entity. Northwest Airlines did the math and found it was cheaper to buy a small competitor than to risk the entry of AirTran Airways as a low-cost carrier smack in the middle of its so-called Heartland market area.
In this case, Northwest is strategically incapable of being a passive investor with TPG Capital. The experience at Duluth, Minn., may highlight why passivity is already a myth.
Midwest announced new flights to Duluth early in its takeover battle. The service was designed to connect Duluth with the Midwest network. Northwest had a lock on daily service prior to Midwest's three daily round trips. One other airline served Duluth, and it only operated flights on Wednesdays and Saturdays to Las Vegas.
Midwest began the Duluth service on March 4, 2007. The takeover involving Northwest was revealed on Aug. 12. On Oct. 19, Midwest announced it would drop Duluth. The city's business newspaper didn't mince words: "Northwest ownership likely affected Midwest decision to exit Duluth."
The following describes snippets of dialogue that could occur in Northwest's boardroom during the next four years:
Question: Why do we and Midwest have full staffing at these airports?
Answer: Let's look at merging operations and laying off some Midwest staff.
Question: Why does Midwest offer its own frequent flier program? Would we not achieve greater marketing power with WorldPerks as the only program for Milwaukee?
Answer: Of course, eliminating the Midwest program would give WorldPerks dominance.
Question: Why is Midwest competing with us on routes where we traditionally have dominated?
Answer: We can start by having Midwest drop Boston and Seattle and see how it goes. I think Milwaukee travelers really don't have a better choice than Northwest.
The final act of this play will be the de-hubbing of Milwaukee and the death of the Midwest brand - and here's the quote that will justify the move: "We tried over the years to keep Midwest as a standalone airline and to preserve its unique product. However, the financial challenges of the airline industry simply prevent us from maintaining this. But rest assured, Northwest is committed to the Milwaukee market."
I think we need to remind ourselves: Northwest has an unfortunate history of abandoning Milwaukee.
Glance at a map of the United States and decide for yourself. Does Northwest really want a fourth hub between Minneapolis, Detroit and Memphis? I think not. And if it merges with Delta (that's the rumor), you can add Cincinnati to the Heartland map.
Don't fool yourself. The leadership at MillerCoors already has connected the dots when comparing Milwaukee's aviation future with that of Denver (it has two hub airlines).
Sadly, we are in grave danger of losing the great economic engine of an airline hub in Milwaukee. I hope Milwaukee's leadership awakens to the fact that vital economic interests are at stake. Watching, waiting and hoping does not make a place great.
Jay Sorensen of Shorewood is an aviation consultant and a former Midwest Airlines marketing manager.
 
This guy was fired from Midwest because he dosn't know what he's talking about. He will never let it go, he's out to slam Midwest anytime he can.
 
..."I hope Milwaukee's leadership awakens to the fact that vital economic interests are at stake. Watching, waiting and hoping does not make a place great."...

Seems the the tranny would have been a better deal for that city. I realize that it's very unwanted but look at the plans they had. Midwest has been in a DIRE situation going all the way back to August 2000. They have only produced two quarters with a (very) small $$. I friend on the property said that furloughs were on they way but quietly pulled back due to the fact that they were to increase MKE service and jobs and are not. It was even said to have been on the cheif pilot hot line for a short time last month. The history is really weak, they have not been adding jobs. Heck did they replace the entire ramp ops in like 2004? Again, Airtran "claimed" to want to expand that city but I really don't think Midwest ever will.
 
Airtran now has 4 gates in MKE and is buying additional ground equipment to support increased flying. I would have to imagine at least 20-25 flights a day by summertime with the additional gate acquisition.

Is the official word still 10 new B737 for 2008?
 
AirTran's 4 gates are going to do nothing to harm Midwest. They will be flights to western cities and Florida that are low yeild. Lets see Trannie follow through on their big expansion plans in MKE and try those new routes they were all promising us like to Buffalo and Montreal. If Forklift Joe had any intelligence he would have already expanded Trannie all over the Carribean and Mexico. Unfortunately for AirTran, they have missed a huge opportunity already.
 
AirTran's 4 gates are going to do nothing to harm Midwest. They will be flights to western cities and Florida that are low yeild. Lets see Trannie follow through on their big expansion plans in MKE and try those new routes they were all promising us like to Buffalo and Montreal. If Forklift Joe had any intelligence he would have already expanded Trannie all over the Carribean and Mexico. Unfortunately for AirTran, they have missed a huge opportunity already.

Wow, you should leave your Skyway gig and go work for Michael Boyd!!!
 
This guy was fired from Midwest because he dosn't know what he's talking about. He will never let it go, he's out to slam Midwest anytime he can.

there's a lot of wine that can be made from the sour grapes that a few air tran pilots seem to display from their failed takeover attempt.

they should read this: http://www.coping.org/control/letgo.htm
 
..."I hope Milwaukee's leadership awakens to the fact that vital economic interests are at stake. Watching, waiting and hoping does not make a place great."...

Seems the the tranny would have been a better deal for that city. I realize that it's very unwanted but look at the plans they had. Midwest has been in a DIRE situation going all the way back to August 2000. They have only produced two quarters with a (very) small $$. I friend on the property said that furloughs were on they way but quietly pulled back due to the fact that they were to increase MKE service and jobs and are not. It was even said to have been on the cheif pilot hot line for a short time last month. The history is really weak, they have not been adding jobs. Heck did they replace the entire ramp ops in like 2004? Again, Airtran "claimed" to want to expand that city but I really don't think Midwest ever will.

so a company that didn't declare bankruptcy EVER is in DIRE situation since 2000, but NWA, Delta, UAL, US Air (x2), America West, and Continental (x2) aren't????????
 
Believe me Karma Police, if I made as much money as that guy does publishing the most obivous facts of the airline business, I would leave any job to do it. Everybody knew the new AirTran routes out of MKE they were proposing were bull. Since they have all these new planes coming, why don't they prove us wrong and start the cities?

NATURE....GOULET.
 
"so a company that didn't declare bankruptcy EVER is in DIRE situation since 2000, but NWA, Delta, UAL, US Air (x2), America West, and Continental (x2) aren't????????"

Not talking about NWA, Delta, UAL, US Air (x2), America West, and Continental or any other. Just talking about the history of YX...
 
Goulet... AAI used to have 1 gate in MKE.. They recently received 3 more. AAI hasn't gotten a new plane since the middle of 2007. Without new planes, AAI wasn't going to pull planes off profitable routes to start new cities out of MKE (new cities rarely make money in the first year). However, AAI is going to start receiving planes again in February.. You can bet some of the 10 new 737's will be placed on new markets out of MKE.. Besides, last time I checked AAI did start new cities (for AAI) out of MKE.. Pretty sure AAI added Phoenix and Las Vegas recently.. You can bet your @ss there is more to come.. The new AAI cities may overlap MEH cities for a while, but there will be cities added that MEH doesn't serve..
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom