Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

B6 Application window open February 11th for 7 days only

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Back in 2008 we told the company that our STD excluded pre-existing conditions.

We showed them the language: "Pre-existing conditions are not covered under the plan'.

Directors, Managers and EVP's all said:

1 You are reading it incorrectly
2. Only for 90 days; not your entire employment
3. That is not the intent of the plan
4. It is not administered that way
5. Jetblue will do the right thing.

Then we found a pilot who was denied STD income replacement by Prudential (admin of Jetblue) because of a pre-existing condition.

Jetblue was quick to point out that this was a 'mistake' and the pilot was paid.

Two months later another pilot was denied STD benefits for pre-existing conditions. This time Jetblue said nothing and the pilot was paid. Three months later the company without an announcement or email to the PVC or another committee or a thank you changed the STD SPD to what it reads today.

MetLife/prudential simply administers the policy language that Jetblue wanted. They wanted STD to exclude pre-existing conditions for your entire career at Jetblue because it is a money saver for - NOT PRUDENTIAL - but Jetblue. JetBlue wants the 2 year limited benefit period for mental and psychological disorders period because it saves them MONEY.

This is just one example of many over the past 6 years. Leadership has to be cornered to make a change. In the meantime pilots and families a$$e$ are hanging out in the wind. But as Bluestick once said: "it doesn't affect that many pilots".
 
Back in 2008 we told the company that our STD excluded pre-existing conditions.

We showed them the language: "Pre-existing conditions are not covered under the plan'.

Directors, Managers and EVP's all said:

1 You are reading it incorrectly
2. Only for 90 days; not your entire employment
3. That is not the intent of the plan
4. It is not administered that way
5. Jetblue will do the right thing.

Then we found a pilot who was denied STD income replacement by Prudential (admin of Jetblue) because of a pre-existing condition.

Jetblue was quick to point out that this was a 'mistake' and the pilot was paid.

Two months later another pilot was denied STD benefits for pre-existing conditions. This time Jetblue said nothing and the pilot was paid. Three months later the company without an announcement or email to the PVC or another committee or a thank you changed the STD SPD to what it reads today.

MetLife/prudential simply administers the policy language that Jetblue wanted. They wanted STD to exclude pre-existing conditions for your entire career at Jetblue because it is a money saver for - NOT PRUDENTIAL - but Jetblue. JetBlue wants the 2 year limited benefit period for mental and psychological disorders period because it saves them MONEY.

This is just one example of many over the past 6 years. Leadership has to be cornered to make a change. In the meantime pilots and families a$$e$ are hanging out in the wind. But as Bluestick once said: "it doesn't affect that many pilots".

One is too many.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top