Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

average airline pilot pay has declined 42% since the airline industry was deregulated

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Rez O. Lewshun

Save the Profession
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Posts
13,422
Time to Re-Regulate the Airline Industry
By Joe Doniach,
“There’s a sucker born every minute.” —P. T. Barnum (attributed)



British Petroleum’s destruction of the Gulf of Mexico is the crowning glory of thirty years of the culture of deregulation, coming as it did on the heels of the worst financial disaster since the Great Depression. If there’s anyone left who still thinks that the “free market” canard is anything other than a means to rob the American public, then they surely can’t be an airline pilot—at least not an airline pilot who’s spent more than a few years in the game—because average airline pilot pay has declined 42% since the airline industry was deregulated in 1978.​
It’s small comfort to know that we are not alone. Although the national wealth of the United States has doubled in the last thirty years (adjusted for inflation), median income has barely changed. In fact, inflation-adjusted median income has actually declined since 2000.[1] So where did all that money go? Not to you and me! Airline pilots, along with the rest of the middle class, are mostly struggling to hang on to what they’ve got: to keep living in their houses, to raise their families in some semblance of dignity, and to avoid going into the workhouse in old age.​
From the Airline Deregulation Act, to getting rid of Glass-Steagal, to gutting Federal oversight of just about every industry, to the TARP, it’s time to acknowledge that the culture of deregulation has been an unmitigated disaster for the American people, and has simply resulted in an enormous transfer of wealth to the oligarchy that maintains political power by exercising its ever-increasing economic power, regardless of which party is in office.[2]



The question is, are the American voters ready to jettison the notion that an unregulated free market is the best way to create wealth? There have been all sorts of myths propagated to sell it, beginning with the oft-misquoted eighteenth century Scots economist Adam Smith, who, despite his label as the father of “Free Market” economics, was in favor of progressive taxation, government regulation, government support of industries where necessary, and even retaliatory tariffs against unfair foreign competition. Not that I’m advocating raising taxes on the middle class, but, as an example of common misconceptions about Smith, in The Wealth of Nations, he wrote: “Every tax, however, is, to the person who pays it, a badge, not of slavery, but of liberty.”

The free market, at least as it’s been applied in the last thirty years in the United States, has simply meant that capital is completely free to flow, as water seeks the lowest level, to wherever it has been able to generate the greatest return, without any restrictions to speak of. In practical terms this is what outsourcing is: Why pay for high-priced labor, such as union airline pilots, when you can get the same thing for one third the price elsewhere in the United States or one tenth the price overseas? The mere threat of outsourcing is enough to keep the rabble in line: Fly those ninety-seaters at low wages, or we’ll find someone to fly them for even lower wages!



FDR’s New Deal was an agreement between Capital and Labor: Capital agreed to give Labor a reasonable share of the wealth, and Labor agreed to restrictions on its ability to extract an excessive share of the wealth through unrestricted job actions. Under this entente cordiale, the American middle class grew and prospered, reaching its zenith in 1974, in terms of median wages, and the United States became more of an egalitarian society, relative to its past. However, although Deregulation eliminated the fetters on Capital, there hasn’t been a corresponding lessening of restrictions on Labor, and the United States is now one of the least egalitarian nations in the Western world, perhaps only exceeded by Britain.[3]



Although airline mergers may give a temporary advantage to the “legacy” airlines through pricing power, the mergers are akin to putting bandaids on a victim of massive internal hemorrhage, because the rules of the game have not changed. New entrants will start up, and the race to the bottom will continue, unless we put a stop to it. Of course, the devil is always in the details, and reinstituting some form of airline regulation is not going to be an easy matter to sell to Congress. However, we have to make the effort to put a stop to some of the worst excesses. Here are some of my ideas for legislation:
  • It is imperative that Congress enact legislation that will eliminate the attractiveness of outsourcing, either by extending the financial liability of the subcontractors to the parent airline, or by requiring that all flights being operated under a particular airline “brand” be flown by pilots who are employed and trained by, and therefore the responsibility of, that airline. Even though the most successful of the LCCs (Southwest, for example) do not outsource their flying, we need to put an end to outsourcing as an attractive means to lower costs.
  • We need to stop allowing any snake-oil salesman (Spirit Airlines, for example) with access to a little capital from pulling a few old planes out of the desert (or getting low- or no-cost leases from the aircraft manufacturers), hiring a bunch of new employees at rock-bottom wages, and starting up yet another airline that sets the pricing bar for all the other airlines. In my opinion the best way to accomplish this is to establish a new Civil Aeronautics Board that will have the power to determine not only whether a prospective new airline is sufficiently capitalized, but also whether it will meet real-world standards for safety and treatment of its employees. In other words, labor standards must be a factor in how an airline operates.
  • We need to enact protections such as HR 4788, the Aviation Jobs Outsourcing Prevention Act, which requires airlines to have “metal in the market”, i.e. aircraft operated by the airline, in proportion to their share of the revenue in any code-sharing arrangement. Although this bill currently has 65 sponsors in the U.S. House of Representatives, to date no senator has introduced the same bill in the U.S. Senate.
  • We need to put in place a genuine national pilot seniority list, to take away the threat of having to give more concessions or having to start over again at the bottom if management ineptitude destroys yet another airline.
  • We need to put back into place defined benefit pensions, only this time owned by our union, so that management cannot use labor’s pension funds as a source of financing their incompetence.
None of these ideas will be easy to put into place, but that’s no reason to give up. It is incumbent on all of us who have chosen the profession of airline pilot to do our best to put an end to the miseries that deregulation and the free market have inflicted on us. I, for one, do not intend to stop trying.

[1] Stiglitz, Joseph E., Freefall: America, Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy, W.W. Norton, 2010

[2] Johnson, Simon, and Kwak, James, Thirteen Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, Pantheon Books, 2010

[3] Wilkinson, Richard, and Pickett, Kate: The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. Bloomsbury Press, 2009.
 
Herb Kelleher sure preyed upon his unsuspecting employees :). I thought the majority of Spirit pilots voted in favor of their contract which was endorsed overwhelmingly by alpa? How much has pay risen for union secretaries over the same period of time?
 
I love when I'm flying with a right wing republican pilot who waxes nostalgic about the days of regulation. (socialism-lite) I have this moment where I try to imagine how their minds can be so utterly devoid of logic and political comprehension.
 
I love when I'm flying with a right wing republican pilot who waxes nostalgic about the days of regulation. (socialism-lite) I have this moment where I try to imagine how their minds can be so utterly devoid of logic and political comprehension.

Like walking into the lounge and seeing Beck's fat head and blackboard on the plasma TV, dozens of pilot eyes fixed hypnotically, hanging on his every word as he condemns organized labor.

Mindboggling.
 
Last edited:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

My father in law collects a government pension from the navy and now works for our local government owned utility company where he gets a generous number of vacation days and a health care package only government employees get.

He thinks he owuld be better off if government were small and out of his life.

Oh yes... if only he had worked for GM. I'm sure he would be retired and collecting a pension right now. lol...
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

My father in law collects a government pension from the navy and now works for our local government owned utility company where he gets a generous number of vacation days and a health care package only government employees get.

He thinks he owuld be better off if government were small and out of his life.

Oh yes... if only he had worked for GM. I'm sure he would be retired and collecting a pension right now. lol...

You must really think this is a great story because you have posted it multiple times. I find it odd that you like to bag on your father-in-law behind his back. Not really cool. Just because someone works for govt does not mean they desire govt intrusion into too many facets of the economy. Also, a pension is not a handout. It is earned for longevity in a historically lower paid career field and part of the pay package. The taxpayer actually saves money by keeping highly trained and experienced people in certain govt jobs.

To show the complete fail of your post again, here is an example: I work for xx airline. They pay me well and I have an A plan waiting for me when I retire. I also get many days off per year. Now pay attention here....do I want them having full access to my financial records? Do I want them them monitoring my internet activity? Say the airline starts dictating my diet because they don't want health care costs affecting the bottom line too much? How about the airline banning all drinking of alcoholic beverages when I am off duty? Say they impose a curfew on me to ensure I get good sleep at night.

You see, just because someone works for the govt does not mean they like a gigantic govt in too many parts of their life.

I think we would be better off if govt were smaller but there are many places in life they are needed. But hey, at least we have an Asian Carp Czar now!
 
Like walking into the lounge and seeing Beck's fat head and blackboard on the plasma TV, dozens of pilot eyes fixed hypnotically, hanging on his every word as he condemns organized labor.

Mindboggling.

I walked into my crash pad when the GM bailout was going on. The owner, an airline Captain, was ranting on how the "unions" were destroying the company. He said they had guys that made $70,000/year and all they did was push buttons because the plants were all automated. When I told him that that sounded like the same B/S that the media portrays about airline pilots, the look on his face as he almost "got it" was priceless.
 
I walked into my crash pad when the GM bailout was going on. The owner, an airline Captain, was ranting on how the "unions" were destroying the company. He said they had guys that made $70,000/year and all they did was push buttons because the plants were all automated. When I told him that that sounded like the same B/S that the media portrays about airline pilots, the look on his face as he almost "got it" was priceless.

The look was probably a reaction to how retarded your comment was. The unions and management destroyed GM. You would be hard pressed to find anyone outside of management that thinks airline pilots are button pushing monkeys.
 
It couldn't be that the Japanese and Germans built a better product... and created better demand?

Exactly. Management at GM failed to accurately gauge what the public wanted. The unions failed to see how the competitor's lower costs could negatively impact GM. Both the Japanese and Germans ran away with the quality reputation and GM has a long way to go to reclaim that. Notice how Honda and Toyota are no longer the "cheap" cars. They have the reputation for quality and people are willing to pay more for it.
 
You must really think this is a great story because you have posted it multiple times. I find it odd that you like to bag on your father-in-law behind his back. Not really cool. Just because someone works for govt does not mean they desire govt intrusion into too many facets of the economy. Also, a pension is not a handout. It is earned for longevity in a historically lower paid career field and part of the pay package. The taxpayer actually saves money by keeping highly trained and experienced people in certain govt jobs.

To show the complete fail of your post again, here is an example: I work for xx airline. They pay me well and I have an A plan waiting for me when I retire. I also get many days off per year. Now pay attention here....do I want them having full access to my financial records? Do I want them them monitoring my internet activity? Say the airline starts dictating my diet because they don't want health care costs affecting the bottom line too much? How about the airline banning all drinking of alcoholic beverages when I am off duty? Say they impose a curfew on me to ensure I get good sleep at night.

You see, just because someone works for the govt does not mean they like a gigantic govt in too many parts of their life.

I think we would be better off if govt were smaller but there are many places in life they are needed. But hey, at least we have an Asian Carp Czar now!

Politics is a competition for resources right? All he is saying is it is contradictory for someone to be fiscally conservative (lower taxes, lower budgets, free markets), yet literally pay for every item they've ever had IN THEIR LIVES from earnings taken from taxing everybody else.

Being socially conservative (government intervention in non fiscal arenas) is another debate.

There are studies that show real prices (adjusted for inflation) for airline tickets have fallen 39 percent on average since the deregulation act of 78. Odd how it matches almost EXACTLY the reduction in pilot earnings according to this study.

As a pilot, I think I would love some government intervention and protection from the downward forces of free market capitalism. As a consumer, not so much. Kind of like some people's apathy for Auto Unions. Over paid lazy button pushers? Possibly, depending on your perspective. But the more higher paying middle class jobs that exist, the more airline tickets will be bought etc.. Standing up for and supporting laborers everywhere AND labor based politicians is in the interest of pilots, yet ironically we are an overwhelmingly conservative group.
 
Last edited:
Politics is a competition for resources right? All he is saying is it is contradictory for someone to be fiscally conservative (lower taxes, lower budgets, free markets), yet literally pay for every item they've ever had IN THEIR LIVES from earnings taken from taxing everybody else.

But there is no contradiction. You make Cynic's father-in-law sound like a freeloader when the reality is he actually contributed to society with his skill set. He did not get any handouts. Society needed the services he provided and compensated him. Fiscally conservative does not mean one is an anarchist. Govt is needed in many places...fire, police, roads, safety and so on and so on. But how much govt do we really want/need? Many people have the perception (some very misguided and some not) that govt is becoming bloated and overly intrusive in our lives.

Do we need such a powerful and enormous federal govt or should states determine their destiny a little more? Do we need the federal govt involved in education except for establishing minimum standards? Do we need such an enormous military? Do we need over 20 intelligence agencies; dozens of law enforcement agencies and more regulations than anyone could even fathom? Do we need a completely broken tax code? Basically, it is my opinion we are slowly becoming a nanny state and I don't think we can afford it in the long run. Because I am a reservist, does it make me a hypocrite for saying this? I think this is what Cynic's father-in-law is trying to tell him. But, Cynic cannot seem to understand exactly what his father-in-law is telling him.
 
What do you guys pay for blue jeans these days? I seem to pay about what I did twenty years ago. It's all relative.
 
Throw me a line if you make it out! I got suckered in!

Cmon man, don't chicken out just because someone starts name calling! I'm a Reservist flying the Globemaster too, doesn't it smack you as a LITTLE weird to sit in our 200 million dollar machine, on OIF/OEF orders, getting fat per diem checks and tax free pay, and flying empty half the time, AND THEN complain about a bloated Federal Government?????

Of course I am all for the compensation Uncle Sam is throwing my way, we deserve it, and so does cynic's dad I'm guessing. Augmented days, jumping time zones and the booze are killing me. But I'm not going to take it, and then rant against the size of the government elsewhere and parade around like I'm some kind of citizen for fiscal responsibility, demanding tax breaks and smaller government, and/or supporting those who do.
 
Who are you and what have you done with the REAL KHARMAPOLICE??
 
The look was probably a reaction to how retarded your comment was. The unions and management destroyed GM. You would be hard pressed to find anyone outside of management that thinks airline pilots are button pushing monkeys.

I'm a button pushing monkey....
 
Cmon man, don't chicken out just because someone starts name calling! I'm a Reservist flying the Globemaster too, doesn't it smack you as a LITTLE weird to sit in our 200 million dollar machine, on OIF/OEF orders, getting fat per diem checks and tax free pay, and flying empty half the time, AND THEN complain about a bloated Federal Government?????

Who got called a name? Arguing on FI....well you know how the Special Olympics analogy goes. The point is you never get anywhere so why even enter the debate. But to answer you question, no. It does not seem a little weird to do any of the things you listed. Guys like you are an interesting bunch. You feel that those who serve in govt do not have any right to criticize the govt or politicians because somehow we are all on the take or getting some kind of handout. Maybe you should re-read my post.

Of course I am all for the compensation Uncle Sam is throwing my way, we deserve it, and so does cynic's dad I'm guessing. Augmented days, jumping time zones and the booze are killing me. But I'm not going to take it, and then rant against the size of the government elsewhere and parade around like I'm some kind of citizen for fiscal responsibility, demanding tax breaks and smaller government, and/or supporting those who do.

Why not? You are trying real hard to draw a hypocricy line here but its not working. There is no hypocricy in serving your country honorably and at the same time trying to improve it. Something you need to learn in life is there are several ways to skin a cat and people have different ideas on how to do it. Obviously we differ. From your posts, I see your solution as doing absolutely nothing. So, with that position, why even enter the debate?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top