kack911:
Many of the crewmembers I have been paired up with were ex Part 121. Almost all of them (Including me) have said that the Avantair in house training program is one of the worst they have ever seen.
Look at the GOM: its out of date, contridictory in many areas, poorly defined rules, etc. According to the GOM, we are still based in CDW with the POI in TEB. I have heard that it is in MCO and based in PIE.
Do we have a safety program? Haven't seen one yet.
Do we have a annual winter icing program like many of the large Part 91K/135 frax/Part 121 carriers? Nope. Not even a handout.
And the list goes on. But heaven forbid to not fill out the interior condition checklist at the end of your tour, blanket messages go out immediately.
But since we are losing so much money, vendors not getting paid, etc, it may not be a viable place to stay on for much longer.
Enjoy that surf for 35K!
Hey Skim,
You're right about the number of guys with 121 experience, I shouldn't have made a generalization like that. In my defense however, it certainly
feels like there is a lack of a meaningful PIC-Dispatcher relationship. I assumed that meant a lack of 121 experience with "joint-operational-control"...but I admit there is the
slight possibility that ex-121 guys might actually be
glad not to be required to share control with a dispatcher.
As for the rest of it...Amen.
I've asked repeatedly for clear, concise written guidance on a wide range of things. Not the least of which is Cold-Weather/De-Icing, ASAP/safety reporting, trip approvals, etc... Yet, we have nothing.
Insofar as "dispatch" has been instructed, the only factors we're required to look at when approving a trip to an airport are 1) Is the aircraft capable of carrying the proposed payload, and 2) Is the aircraft capable of flying the sortie non-stop assuming full fuel.
Thats it.
Nevermind that the airport is surrounded by high-terrain in all quadrants, the runway is 3700 x 75ft, the field elevation is 7,000ft, there's no instrument approaches, no ASOS, no VGSI, you've got 7 pax, a full bag of fuel for a 3.5 hour trip. Oh, and its at night...on your 7th day...at the end of a 5-leg day.
According to the current guidance...I shouldn't have even looked at all of that. I should have approved the trip based on the fact that we didn't exceed the structural limits of the airplane, and (without regard for runway performance) we are able to carry enough fuel to fly the Great Circle route to the destination on a Standard Day in calm winds.
Fun huh?
Like you said, training in non-existant. Hey, what is the max crosswind component on a contaminated runway anyway? I guess I don't need to know.
I could go on and on, but its fruitless. I feel bad hanging crews out to dry, while the managment and the FS department concoct new ways to screw you over.
Just know there are a couple of us in FF who can genuinely help you if you have an issue in flight, on the ground, wherever. We have limited equipment and resources to do it with, but we have the knowledge and experience to make up for it.
The Kack