Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Aux. Fuel Pump Question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

BYUFlyr

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Posts
106
Does anyone see anything wrong with leaving the fuel pumps "on" in the pattern when performing touch and goes on a Piper Seneca? Does it affect the aircraft's performance? Fuel mixture?

I think it's a safe practice and I see no drawbacks with leaving them on. Turning them off at 500 AGL just to turn them back on 30 seconds later seems like an unnecessary addition to the workload and increases the chances of inadvertently landing with your back-up fuel pumps "off".

I had a discussion about this with my MEI and I didn't feel like he gave me a good reason to turn them "off" when we're staying in the pattern. The POH does not say that you have to turn them off at 500 AGL. It states that you MAY turn them off above 500 AGL.

We also had the same discussion about cowl flaps in the pattern (leaving them open). Can someone more experienced than me shed some light on this?
 
I'd go with the POH...check out the Amplified procedures sections and see if it recommends...for example, the 172RG POH specifies leaving the gear down in the pattern. I discussed this with an examiner and after one "gear up" and "gear down" he said I could leave them down...

When in doubt, the POH is set up by the manufacturer...go by that.

I know that doesn't really help, but that's all I got...

-mini
 
If any A&P's weigh in on this, I'm sure they will tell you it is to increase the service life of the aux fuel pump. It's like the landing light -- it would be safer to leave it on all the time, but then you'd spend a lot replacing landing lights. In many larger aircraft, boost pumps, while not technically the same, are left on at all times during flight.

Remember an aux pump is a backup to provide fuel under positive pressure in case the engine driven fuel pump fails. Having the aux fuel pumps on or off won't affect fuel flow -- that's the function of the fuel control via the mixture and throttle settings.

I'll let someone else cover cowl flaps. I don't feel up to the inevitable argument.
 
Last edited:
hawg2hawk said:
I'll let someone else cover cowl flaps. I don't feel up to the inevitable argument.

I'll try ---

Leave 'em open...on the climbout you wont overheat and you probably won't shock cool 'em either...one less thing to worry about should some numbnutz taxi onto the runway when you're on short final...

-mini

*edit*
But again...if the POH says close 'em and open 'em when appropriate...do it
 
minitour said:
I discussed this with an examiner and after one "gear up" and "gear down" he said I could leave them down...
-mini

really, WTF!!?!?!
mine made me do up and down every time
 
Kream926 said:
really, WTF!!?!?!
mine made me do up and down every time

yeah well...mine also wouldn't let me use rudder during the maneuvers...so take it for what its worth...

Luckily though we went out and did the maneuvers first so that was the "gear up" and on base was the "gear down" for the first touch and go...didn't touch it the rest of the time...

He either didn't care, didn't know about the POH saying that, or was impressed that I knew and just went with it...I'm thinking it was a "didn't care"

-mini
 
minitour said:
yeah well...mine also wouldn't let me use rudder during the maneuvers...so take it for what its worth...

Luckily though we went out and did the maneuvers first so that was the "gear up" and on base was the "gear down" for the first touch and go...didn't touch it the rest of the time...

He either didn't care, didn't know about the POH saying that, or was impressed that I knew and just went with it...I'm thinking it was a "didn't care"

-mini

Maybe not. I've ridden with countless instructors and check pilots in a bunch of different airplanes, and every time I see something like this, the reason offered is "so we don't wear out the gear/aux pump/landing light" etc.
Sometimes valid, sometimes not, but hopefully the IP knows AND cares!
 
hawg2hawk said:
If any A&P's weigh in on this, I'm sure they will tell you it is to increase the service life of the aux fuel pump.

I am not an A&P but I would also guess that is why. Does anyone know how often the aux pump operation is verified? Annual? I would guess that an inop aux pump could go undetected for quite some time if the plane got 100% of its fuel from the engine driven pump.
 
I'd say that the pumps would be checked prior to each flight or at least daily. The newer 172's I used to fly were checked during engine priming. We used the pump for priming prior to start and the pump operation was obvious (both audible indications and fuel flow meter). The PA44's were the same, could hear the pumps operating prior to engine start.

Dutch
 
not just that but dont you check for increase in fuel pressure during run-up with the aux pump on. i do, and i think poh checklist sais so too. and mini, how on gods green earth did you do a checkride in an RG with no rudder and how the hell did you enter those manuevers correctly? i dont have a PTS around but if im not mistaken it sais to enter manuevers coordinated?
 
I don't know which seneca you're flying, but in the seneca III that I fly, putting the boost pumps to "low" makes the mixture too rich and the engines starts stumbling and running rough.......put them on "high" and the engine loses power and almost quits because of too much fuel.....who'da ever thought you'd have to worry about that???.......
 
It's all about the training, gents. The training. Training a habit pattern.

Gear up. Pumps off. Cowl flaps closed on level off.
Gear down. Pumps on. Cowl flaps as appropriate.

'Round and 'round the pattern repeating those moves until they are automatic.

Sure, once you have the automaticity drilled in, then you can, and should, begin to think about each movement, and tailor to the specific environment.

Most people, however, barely get enough training time in a complex or multi to go beyound the rote automatic to think or get into the "other than checkride stuff'.

If you were trained initially in a retract, and your instructor/ airplane owner wanted to save wear & tear on the gear and made you do the patterns INITIALLY leaving the gear down all the time, you would be set up to land gear up later when you were PIC and had actally raised the gear.

And experience teaches us that doing a critical motion just a few times may not be enough to really drill it in. Of course this varies with each individual. Do you want to bet your life on being able to "remember".

Don't you think it is better to over-do than under-do?

Training. That's all it is.
 
indianboy7 said:
I don't know which seneca you're flying, but in the seneca III that I fly, putting the boost pumps to "low" makes the mixture too rich and the engines starts stumbling and running rough.......put them on "high" and the engine loses power and almost quits because of too much fuel.....who'da ever thought you'd have to worry about that???.......

My guess is that he's talking about a Seneca I, which has the Lycomming IO-360's. I believe the POH says to turn the pumps on for take-offs and landings.
 
DrewBlows said:
My guess is that he's talking about a Seneca I, which has the Lycomming IO-360's. I believe the POH says to turn the pumps on for take-offs and landings.

Yep... It's the Seneca I
 
nosehair said:
It's all about the training, gents. The training. Training a habit pattern.

Gear up. Pumps off. Cowl flaps closed on level off.
Gear down. Pumps on. Cowl flaps as appropriate.

I'm not talking about omitting them from the checklist, just verifying that they're appropriately set for the current conditions instead of blindly flipping the switch or ducking under the quadrant to automatically close the cowl flaps.

Does this make sense?
 
Nosehair Is Wise!

Nosehair knows. It's not about saving money on pumps and lights, it about you getting accustomed to pulling all the knobs and switches the right way at the right time, Don't let some jacka$$ try and do training in a retract with the gear down all the time, it's just stupid.
 
nosehair said:
It's all about the training, gents. The training. Training a habit pattern.

Gear up. Pumps off. Cowl flaps closed on level off.
Gear down. Pumps on. Cowl flaps as appropriate.

'Round and 'round the pattern repeating those moves until they are automatic.

Sure, once you have the automaticity drilled in, then you can, and should, begin to think about each movement, and tailor to the specific environment.

Most people, however, barely get enough training time in a complex or multi to go beyound the rote automatic to think or get into the "other than checkride stuff'.

If you were trained initially in a retract, and your instructor/ airplane owner wanted to save wear & tear on the gear and made you do the patterns INITIALLY leaving the gear down all the time, you would be set up to land gear up later when you were PIC and had actally raised the gear.

And experience teaches us that doing a critical motion just a few times may not be enough to really drill it in. Of course this varies with each individual. Do you want to bet your life on being able to "remember".

Don't you think it is better to over-do than under-do?

Training. That's all it is.

Maybe that "Critical Motion" you mention might be to read the checklist.
 
I completely agree with being consitent in procedures and especially checklists, but don't you think flipping the fuel pumps off, then back on 30 seconds later, times about 20 laps around the pattern is a bit hard on the ole pumps after awhile?

Sure maybe not in the short term, but I bet you'd wear those pumps out a lot quicker then if you'd just leave them on for that extra 30 seconds. And I haven't priced fuel pumps before, but there isn't nothing on those twins that are cheap!

If you want to remain consistent in procedures, just have the student call out "simulated fuel pump off", while touching the switches. That way it keeps it fresh in his head, and keeps the flow going.
 
C'mom people

"Simulated fuel pump off" is just as stupid as simulated gear down, your just building bad habits in your students, all to save a few bucks (maybe?) in an airplane you don't even own. This is TRAINING the whole point is to turn all that crap on and off and on again, yes every thirty seconds, that is why your there.
 
Remember an aux pump is a backup to provide fuel under positive pressure in case the engine driven fuel pump fails. Having the aux fuel pumps on or off won't affect fuel flow -- that's the function of the fuel control via the mixture and throttle settings.

Not always true. You can't run the AUX pump on HIGH with reduced power setting on the BE36TC or you will loose power and fast.

http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X14188&key=1
 
DAS at 10/250 said:
Not always true. You can't run the AUX pump on HIGH with reduced power setting on the BE36TC or you will loose power and fast.

http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X14188&key=1

This is always true in the Seneca I.... The key is to refer to the POH....

The POH says fuel pump off at safe altitude; so I'll turn them off at the altitude I determine to be a "safe altitude". In my opinion at 4,500 MSL field elevation; 500 AGL is not a safe altitude in case of an engine-driven fuel pump failure in a 35 year old Seneca I.

I'm training to be a pilot, not a cowl flap or a fuel pump operator. Any chimp can read and execute a checklist (maybe not "read", but they can flip switches just fine with a little training); pilots follow checklists and think before fliping switches and pulling handles. That's what differentiates the two.

Just my opinion... I respect the opinions of other CFI's. Specially since 99% of you are more experienced than I am.
 
Currently, I'm instructing at UND. We fly Warriors, Arrows, and Seminoles. In the Warrior (and as of January in the Seminole), we leave fuel pumps on until cruise. In the Arrow, we switch off the pump at 1000 AGL. Prior to January, we had been switching off the fuel pumps in the Seminole at 500 AGL. However, it was Piper that made this change in policy/publishing in there POH's... thus our mgmt. decided to follow.

I'm sure it's just a liablity thing for Piper... if you're in the pattern, it never hurts to leave the pumps on as far as I know.
 
DAS at 10/250 said:
Not always true. You can't run the AUX pump on HIGH with reduced power setting on the BE36TC or you will loose power and fast.

http://ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20001211X14188&key=1

Guys, fuel pumps aren't the same in all engines. Lycomings and Continentals have different fuel injection systems that run on different principles when metering the fuel. Putting the boost pump on in a Conti will cause it to run rich and stumble. In a Lycoming, it doesn't matter if it's on or off, it'll run the same. Difference is, you put the pump on in a Lyc in case the mechanical pump fails in the pattern. In a Cont you flip the boost pump on quickly and usually play with the mixture until you get it running well enough. Is one safer than the other? I dunno, but the point is to always do what the manufacturer recommends.
 
MTpilot said:
"Simulated fuel pump off" is just as stupid as simulated gear down, your just building bad habits in your students, all to save a few bucks (maybe?) in an airplane you don't even own....
I'm sorry but I think thats just a bad attitude right there! I've always make it a point to respect every person's airplane that I fly. Just because I don't own it, and this is "training" doesnt mean I should just use and abuse the aircraft, and run up the ole repair bill for the owner.

Owning an airplane isn't cheap, and just cause you have no invested interest in the aircraft doesn't mean you shouldn't respect the owners investment, and the fact that he gave YOU the right to fly/rent it in the first place.

Simple things like leaning the mixture at altitude, not flipping the fuel pump off and on every 30 seconds, or turning off any non-essential lights on a cross country, may all be small things, but in the end they can really add up.

Airplanes aren't like cars, where if something breaks you just go down and get a $20 replacement part for them. Always fly an airplane like it's your own!
 
Mmmmmm Burritos said:
Guys, fuel pumps aren't the same in all engines. Lycomings and Continentals have different fuel injection systems that run on different principles when metering the fuel. Putting the boost pump on in a Conti will cause it to run rich and stumble. In a Lycoming, it doesn't matter if it's on or off, it'll run the same. Difference is, you put the pump on in a Lyc in case the mechanical pump fails in the pattern. In a Cont you flip the boost pump on quickly and usually play with the mixture until you get it running well enough. Is one safer than the other? I dunno, but the point is to always do what the manufacturer recommends.

Thank you....
 
minitour said:
I'd go with the POH...check out the Amplified procedures sections and see if it recommends...for example, the 172RG POH specifies leaving the gear down in the pattern. I discussed this with an examiner and after one "gear up" and "gear down" he said I could leave them down...

When in doubt, the POH is set up by the manufacturer...go by that.

I know that doesn't really help, but that's all I got...

-mini


As an A&P that knows the results of putting the gear up in the pattern while doing touch and goes....HOT BRAKES!!!

If you do not leave them down in the breeze to cool down, the brakes will heat up and blow the plugs out (if installed) or melt the rubber on the rims.

Not a pretty picture...aircraft landing with melting rubber slinging all over the place.


.....tell that to your instructor!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom