scoreboardII
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Posts
- 2,694
No, wrong again, the answer to that is because thats how Morris did it.You forgot to mention because "that is the way we did it in the fighter"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, wrong again, the answer to that is because thats how Morris did it.You forgot to mention because "that is the way we did it in the fighter"
Whats an IAN? Says the guy who gets to look at three lights during a CATIII.IAN is good stuff. Makes any straight in non precision, a precision approach w/ a capturable glide path. Much cooler than using VS. RNP approaches using LNAV and VNAV would be about the same except they are not straight in approaches. Both make life alot easier/safer and hope someday SWA sees the value in this. There are more HUDs than autoland configured airplanes. That one ain't changing, unless the SWA POI insisted for some reason.
IAN is good stuff. Makes any straight in non precision, a precision approach w/ a capturable glide path. Much cooler than using VS. RNP approaches using LNAV and VNAV would be about the same except they are not straight in approaches. Both make life alot easier/safer and hope someday SWA sees the value in this. There are more HUDs than autoland configured airplanes. That one ain't changing, unless the SWA POI insisted for some reason.
AA is also one of the few who don't certify the 738s with autoland. Hand-flown HUD on CAT 3s only.
Alaska has lower mins cause we autoland using the HUD as a extra reference .. 30 foot DH...