Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ATI and the IBT

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

flyinboxes

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Posts
246
Hello ATI'ers. Heard some rumblings form a few of your crew members a while back that you guys may be going solo or ALPA. Still any rumblings going on?
 
Either would be new to me. We discussed going in-house a number of years ago and decided against it, and ALPA has never really been on our minds as we LIKE our PFEs. We're sticking with the devil we know for the time being, which is IBT 747.
 
Either would be new to me. We discussed going in-house a number of years ago and decided against it, and ALPA has never really been on our minds as we LIKE our PFEs. We're sticking with the devil we know for the time being, which is IBT 747.


Just curious as to the comment " and ALPA has never really been on our minds as we LIKE our PFEs."

Care to elaborate on this?
 
Either would be new to me. We discussed going in-house a number of years ago and decided against it, and ALPA has never really been on our minds as we LIKE our PFEs. We're sticking with the devil we know for the time being, which is IBT 747.

I'm sure that ABX LIKES their PFE's, too. Unfortunately nobody can protect PFE's from the company's decisions. All of ABX's PFE's are on the street and they are IBT.

Astar SO's aren't paid as much as ABX's were (when they had them) but they ARE paid as much or more that most legacy pax carrier FO's. AND there is a shred of a chance of future growth at Astar unlike some other places.

The reality is that the plight of PFE's has little to do with whether a carrier is ALPA or IBT. The strength, direction, and destiny of ANY union comes from within the ranks of that carriers own pilot group - NOT from the national union council that represents them. Virtually any failure of our unions can be directly attributed to the local leadership of that union.

That being said, however, IF you ever need resources EITHER IBT or ALPA would be worlds better than going independent. Lawyers, strike funds, contract negotiating experience, communication systems, surveys, etc., etc. are all things that you'd be hard pressed to have in any really useful amount with an independent union. ALPA and IBT both have their plusses and minuses but either would be better than going it alone.

8
 
As a former Eastern guy I am a pro union. But lately I'm strongly starting to have the feeling that both, ALPA and Teamsters, have grown too big and they are not up to their original purpose anymore. Both are becoming more and more some kind of Mafia kind of organization.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top