Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ATC controller fired for taking a 5 hour nap on the job

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
The Federal Aviation Administration said the unnamed controller slept for five hours intentionally during the midnight shift on Feb. 19 in Knoxville, Tenn.

It's the second incident in as many months that an FAA controller fell asleep during a midnight shift. A supervisor working alone at Washington's Reagan National Airport fell asleep for at least 24 minutes shortly after midnight on March 23.

In the incident at McGhee Tyson Airport in Knoxville, a controller working in a radar room responsible for guiding planes in a roughly 50-mile radius around the airport was unresponsive for five hours, the FAA said.

Another controller working at the airport's tower was able to monitor the seven aircraft that flew into the airspace during that time, the agency said in a statement. All of the aircraft landed safely.

"The FAA will not tolerate this type of unprofessional and inappropriate behavior," the statement said.

The agency is conducting a nationwide review of staffing at air-traffic facilities during midnight shifts as a result of the recent incidents.

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association union is representing the unnamed controller in disciplinary proceedings, spokesman Doug Church said. The FAA said it is "taking steps to fire" the controller, but has not done so yet.

After the incident last month at Reagan National, the union demanded that additional controllers be added at towers where a single person worked on midnight shifts as a safety measure to limit the risks that a controller could fall asleep.

"Once again, we've got a midnight shift issue," Church said. "Those are very concerning to us. We believe that staffing always needs to be what's looked at, here and at other facilities."

Typically, air-traffic facilities are designed with enough flexibility that controllers in a tower can handle traffic far outside an airport. In most cases at small and midsize airports, controllers are trained to handle both landings and takeoffs as well as higher altitude traffic.

In the incident at Reagan National, a controller admitted to investigators at the National Transportation Safety Board that he had inadvertently fallen asleep. He is on paid leave while the agency investigates.

Two airliners landed at the airport without a landing clearance after their pilots were advised by another controller in a facility in nearby Virginia that they could touch down using rules for airports without towers.

Afterward, the FAA told controllers that they should offer pilots the chance to divert to another airport rather than land at a major commercial airport without a tower controller. The FAA also added a second controller on the midnight shift at the security sensitive airport, which is only a few miles from the White House and Congress.

The NTSB and the FAA are also investigating a separate incident in which a controller requested that a Southwest Airlines pilot fly close to a small private plane near Orlando on March 27.
 
I flew freight out of TYS some years ago. The graveyard shift was always manned by one controller who did ATIS, CLRC, GRD, TWR, APP and DEP. They always sounded alert and I rarely had to call twice to get their attention.

FAA needs to look at the constantly rotating shifts with minimum rest in between. WHy do they do the constant rotation anyway? Seems to me a monthly shift rotation would be much less likely to produce sleep deprivation.
 
If things are that quiet at night, why the hell are we paying to keep that tower open during the overnight shift anyway? Close the damn thing at 11pm, save some tax money, and operate it as an uncontrolled airport at night.
 
If things are that quiet at night, why the hell are we paying to keep that tower open during the overnight shift anyway? Close the damn thing at 11pm, save some tax money, and operate it as an uncontrolled airport at night.

Cuz god forbid pilots land without being "cleared to land"
 
If things are that quiet at night, why the hell are we paying to keep that tower open during the overnight shift anyway? Close the damn thing at 11pm, save some tax money, and operate it as an uncontrolled airport at night.

And the irony of it all is that instead they will put a second controller there.
 
exactly- how many of us have endured another round of ignorant questions from all types b/c of this. It's a non issue- the security issue around DCA makes sense= but all the others-- let the guy in reno nap- just put it on the atis- "hey, im napping, do your thing"
The public has been taught to believe that ATC is more than it really is. It's purpose is for separation in congested airspace and times-- not for quiet nights, when they really don't serve a purpose

Once again- the FAA is showing it's arse- the problem is that they schedule in the most ridiculous ways- there is no reason ATC can't be run like every 24 hour operation - but these rotations are literally inhuman, and are absolutely contrary to any science of sleep and fatigue. That's the real issue. If there are times in the swing shift that a controller is needed- controlled naps are recommended by every study done in the past 40 years.
We should have a procedure for controlled naps, and so should controllers.
 
If things are that quiet at night, why the hell are we paying to keep that tower open during the overnight shift anyway? Close the damn thing at 11pm, save some tax money, and operate it as an uncontrolled airport at night.

That's what I said. Probably safer if everyone understands it's an uncontrolled airport up front, and proceeds accordingly.
 
......
The public has been taught to believe that ATC is more than it really is. ....

All of my non-flying friends think that ATC is solely responsible for the safe operation of aircraft and that pilots are only there to drive the planes and follow ATC's instructions.:erm:
 
On the budgetary, taxpayer side, what most of the public isn't aware of is the towers the FAA has turned over to private contractors. Usually at airports with around 100 ops a day, with perhaps a couple of EAS flights. Meanwhile down the road, there's an airport with similar ops, that is uncontrolled, simply because a tower was never built there. Once a tower has been built, it will be staffed one way or the other.

I have a retired military buddy, who draws a decent government pension, and works at one of these towers. He jokes about being a controller there. Spends 8 hours looking out the windows at nothing, and pulls down $55K a year doing it. Good gig if you can get it, but basically glorified welfare.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top