Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Asiana B-767

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Take your own advice and lighten up D-Bag. Go drag your tail somewhere else taildragger, most likely in gay bars. Move along buckwheat!

The maturity you display in your posts leads me to believe you are flame-baiting. You come off as a freshman in a wannabe uni somewhere.

Get a clue kid - and if you are for real - Asiana did themselves a favor...

fv
 
You come off as a freshman in a wannabe uni somewhere.

Get a clue kid - and if you are for real - Asiana did themselves a favor...

Alright professor go pontificate your wisdom where somebody cares like back to your ghetto hood project where you belong. Lighten up dude, I don't want/need your worthless advice I simply came on here because I thought it was a ridculous requirement to pass over a qualified-typed B-757/767 pilot because they lack 767-300 time.
 
Last edited:
Yea I'll be sure and get right on that. Do you just walk right in to 7-11 where you work and say I'd like to order 500 hours of 767-300 time, Get a clue!


Hahahaha!!! Let me know how that turns out, fool. And while you're there, pick yourself up a slurpee, I heard they were free with a purchase of 500 hrs. -300 time. It's a win/win situation. :beer:
 
I have just applied through Rishworth to Asiana and they will not accept B-767-200 pilots, only B-767-300 pilots. I only have 767-200 flight time. What a ridiculous requirement and now consider myself just a lowly, pathetic B-767-200 pilot not worthy of Asiana's superior status. Can any of you 767-300 pilots shed some light on why this would be such a big deal? I have flown ETOPS 767-200s and we have HDGs so someone please enlighten me as to why Asiana would have such a ridiculous requirement. The contract at Asiana is VERY subpar and not very good for commuting so no big loss anyway. Good luck to you 767-300 Sky Gods.

Oh boy, that makes TWICE now that such good sarcasm went to waste. I feel for ya man.

Good thing this didn't create the same kind of drama it did on the "other board".
 
Wow this is something I'd expect to see on the regional boards.
 
Wow this is something I'd expect to see on the regional boards.

No kidding.... I do not know what is worse, the "STUPID" -300 requirement over the -200, or Wyomingpilot's response.

Holy Cow man, taking out Asiana's silly requirement on our fellow pilots is pretty pathetic. Don't worry about the -300 time, you wouldn't have been hired with your attitude and personality.

AAflyer
 
Relax dude, take a chill pill,

WYOMINGPILOT said:
Take your own advice and lighten up D-Bag.

WYOMINGPILOT said:
Lighten up dude, I don't want/need your worthless advice...

Now this is funny, or perhaps just sad. Three times on this thread WYO says to lighten up or chill... which is pretty much what everyone is doing, posting some sarcastic, easy going jokes... no big deal, pretty tame by FI standards. Apparently WYO is too defensive, stupid or dense to get it, so he goes off on a nasty rant to each response.

WYOMING, take your own advice and chill, lighten up, or just go away. None of the responses on this thread warrant you getting your panties twisted up in a bunch.
 
Wyoming pilot,

Boy, you didn't put that you were from Wyoming on you application?! Cause I don't think it was the lack of your -300 time that didn't get you hired.


Haha, flaming is fun. No offence to any pilots from Wyoming; just couldn't help myself.
 
Yep, the 200 lands just a little differently than the 300 and just a little different than the 757. It is right in the middle. Just pull power at a different time.

I think that everyone has had that type of issue at one time or another. Just let it roll off your back and move on. Better yet, reapply and see what happens.
 
I think that everyone has had that type of issue at one time or another. Just let it roll off your back and move on. Better yet, reapply and see what happens

Finally some good advice on this board. Parc has the same contract, I may reapply after I hear back from several other positions I've applied for if nothing else turns up.

Boy, you didn't put that you were from Wyoming on you application?! Cause I don't think it was the lack of your -300 time that didn't get you hired
.

Wyoming is a much nicer place than your Ghetto project in Detroit. You and your gay Red Wings players skate on back to your high unemployment lines.

No kidding.... I do not know what is worse, the "STUPID" -300 requirement over the -200, or Wyomingpilot's response
.

Hey AAFlyer, move along back to your sinking legacy ship. Aren't you getting furloughed soon or is it time for another pay cut?
 
AA sinking legacy ship ya your on crack. No wonder you didn't get the job.
 
AA sinking legacy ship ya your on crack. No wonder you didn't get the job
.

No I can't afford the stuff. I never interviewed for the job. You can move along now to your meth factory shack in your C-152 back to your regional wannabe forums.
 
You say you didn't get the call because you don't have -300 time nobody said anything about interviewing.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom