JoeMerchant
ASA pilot
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Posts
- 6,353
FishandFly said:Joe, your logic is wrong.
Both SKYW and ASA management know that the contract we work out is going to cost them more than they have already offered. Why did they not offer more? Maybe because they are smart? We're all so ticked off that they have strung this out for so long that many people are simply wanting to strike for spite.
Fish, I believe your logic is wrong. First, ASA management is along for the ride just as we are. They aren't the decision makers. The decisions are being made in SGU. I agree that they are willing to pay a little more than they are offering, but nowhere near what we are asking for. Capitulating to ALPA would send the SKYW ALPA vote over the top. Jerry isn't going to allow that to happen IMO. As far as "simply wanting to strike for spite", that isn't smart. This should be approached in a business like manner and not an emotional one.
FishandFly said:It is not in the interest of management to have it's workforce strike. But it is in the interest of management to GAUGE the potential action of the workforce.
When management does come out with their offer, it will be less than it could have been because of your failure to vote correctly.
Exactly, without a single list, I don't want to be the highest paid group in the DCI portfolio, and I don't want to have higher costs than SKYW. The highest cost carriers in portfolios have targets on their backs. I don't think we need to be the lowest, but we also don't want to be the highest - unless of course you want to shrink.