Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

any RV owners/pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Do a goggle search for "Greg Nelson F-1 Rocket". I've flown in Greg's pit, and it is an awesome aircraft. I'd say that for the extra $$, you'll get substantial increase in performance. Also, Greg is about 6'1", I'd guess. He designed a magneto-less ignition system for it that works fantastic, too.
 
Huggyu2 said:
Do a goggle search for "Greg Nelson F-1 Rocket". I've flown in Greg's pit, and it is an awesome aircraft. I'd say that for the extra $$, you'll get substantial increase in performance. Also, Greg is about 6'1", I'd guess. He designed a magneto-less ignition system for it that works fantastic, too.

You talking about electronic ignition, or FADEC? There are a lot of manufac's producing those setups. FADEC on em is F'ing sweet. Push a button, and the computer primes, cranks, and starts the engine. No more pumping, priming, swearing, cranking, flooding, etc.
 
Just another word of caution

Make sure that whatever you build, you're going to be able to get insurance on it for your particular situation at a price that you can still afford some $4 per gallon fuel.

It can be an eye-opener when it comes time to change that builders policy to one where the machine actually gets airborne.

Sorry, I gotta leave- these flashing ads are causing siezures....:nuts:
 
Saw a couple Rockets in Arlington over the weekend and I gotta say if you have wads of cash, go for it. You won't be disappointed. On the other hand, the 7 and 8 are exceptional machines and (I believe) a better value overall.
 
Unleaded said:
Make sure that whatever you build, you're going to be able to get insurance on it for your particular situation at a price that you can still afford some $4 per gallon fuel.

It can be an eye-opener when it comes time to change that builders policy to one where the machine actually gets airborne.

Sorry, I gotta leave- these flashing ads are causing siezures....:nuts:

Ya I used to think the MOGAS STC was a total waste of cash, not so more anymore.

Which leads me to the next thread...
 
Unleaded said:
Make sure that whatever you build, you're going to be able to get insurance on it for your particular situation at a price that you can still afford some $4 per gallon fuel.

It can be an eye-opener when it comes time to change that builders policy to one where the machine actually gets airborne.

Sorry, I gotta leave- these flashing ads are causing siezures....:nuts:

No problem insuring an RV. I have 75K hull on an RV-6A and pay $1300/year.
 
How about a -4? I've got building/flight experience with an 8, but am interested in a -4 for economy. I'm 6' tall......want to do an occasional trip(nothing epic), mostly local flying/light acro. Thoughts?
 
Yeh, my insurance is the same exact thing as neflier, but mine is a 6, not a 6a..

svcrta - you may wanna look at a 6.. I am 6'3" 250 and fit in ours fine and we're burning 7-9gal an hour.. :D
 
Yeah, I know the 6 is rommier, but I prefer the tandem config. Thanks for the steer, though.
 
My hanger mate has an RV-8 (Mr April in Van's 2006 calendar). I've been in the back of both the 4 and 8. The 8 is a better airplane, IMHO. As of last month, the fuse on the 8 is prepunched. By the time you're done, the minor difference in kit costs would be minimal.

The 8 has a higher resale value and you have the option for a trike (8A). The insurance is lower with the trike. The 8 is larger, has more baggage and a much larger fuel tank. There is minimal cost difference between an O-320 (RV-4) and O-360 (RV-8).

My vote is for the 8 over the 4.
 
Unless of course your are buying a flying airplane, then the resale plays a big part. We got a nice VFR 4 for under 40K.
 
Whatever you buy, just make sure the tailwheel goes on the back (conventional), not the front (unconventional). Way more fun!
 
just an update...still looking. 2007 will be "airplane year". Wife now wants something that entire family can use. So I am now looking at Bellanca Viking's.

Will probably end up buying a high-time Traumahawk when its all said and done.
 
satpak77 said:
just an update...still looking. 2007 will be "airplane year". Wife now wants something that entire family can use. So I am now looking at Bellanca Viking's.

Will probably end up buying a high-time Traumahawk when its all said and done.

Family truckster = RV-10
 
Yeh, the 10 is a nice bird.. We've been thinking about unloading the 6 and picking up a 10..
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom