Another SWA proposal

[scoreboardII]

1. Because the process is being honored per the agreement.

2. We don't need a union, but felt an organization with a snappy log would be cool.

 

[sfomarc]

Just a couple questions. If keeping us AT pilots separate and no merging us is an option, it seems like that would be exactly what SW would do? Why bother with any of this if that was a possible solution for SWAPA pilots.
I believe our scope clause does not allow for SWA to do as you say without the agreement of SWAPA. If we were to do as you mention I would guess it would be a one time deal, for a set time as to draw down the AT side. Not something I want to see as we all have bills to pay and families to feed. There is no way SWAPA would agree the above without a time line.

Question 2. If the ties between SWAPA and management are so strong, why do you guys have a union? It seems one is not even needed.

How would the company be able to bargain and communicate with 5,000 plus pilots without some sort of representation?

 

[dicko]

1. Because the process is being honored per the agreement.

I'm beginning to understand why you wear that black helmet. That would have been impossible to say with a straight face.

 

[scarlet]

I can tell a lot of people HAVE not read Federal Law B/M. Process agreement. CBAs

Gary, knows what he agreed too, and the unions know as well.

 

[freightdogfred]

I can tell a lot of people HAVE not read Federal Law B/M. Process agreement. CBAs

Gary, knows what he agreed too, and the unions know as well.

Enlighten me. What exactly did he agree to?

 

[wood pecker]

Stop getting our MC wasted so they can send us an update.

We get it. An agreement was made then SW took the papers from the MC and wiped their rears with it before sticking the papers back on the table. Then SW said take this crap or get lost.

At least your leadership cares enough to get involved. I'm jealous and can't wait to read Nuts 2 when it is revealed how a true leader slams the opposition.

When can we start flying together?

 

[SWA/FO]

Gary, knows what he agreed too, and the unions know as well

You get a list from arbys, u can't force Gary to use the list. Of course, you can try to.

 

[slaquer5]

All u get is a list... List might now be used. Even tranny's lawyer had told them that. U are stupid OY6!

That is an insult To all the stupid people to put her ( oy6) in the same category .

 

[scoreboardII]

I'm beginning to understand why you wear that black helmet. That would have been impossible to say with a straight face.

Why thank you.

:beer:

 

[OldManPilot]

You get a list from arbys, u can't force Gary to use the list. Of course, you can try to.

This is my point, if GK does not have to use the arbitration list, then why even go to arbitration ???