Another multi logging question

[SigAV8R]

I don't think there's a bright line test for number of hours.

What you have to do is much simpler. Ask yourself "Is this really an instructional flight or are we just trying to screw around with the regs to build time?"

"Dual Received" with no control manipulation for stuff that could be down on the ground? My "smell" threshold would be pretty short.

Yes, but what if it is for "flight training" in that particular airplane...as in the person sitting in the right seat needs to build make/model time for insurance regulations but also twin time? Does that still apply?

 

[midlifeflyer]

Yes, but what if it is for "flight training" in that particular airplane...as in the person sitting in the right seat needs to build make/model time for insurance regulations but also twin time? Does that still apply?

I'm not sure I understand. Let's make sure I know what you're asking.

Pilot A is a CFI. Pilot B is not (or whether or not pilot B is a CFI is irrelevant). Pilot B needs make and model time for insurance requirements and also, of course, wants to build time.

A and B fly together. The purpose of the flight is not flight instruction, but a single pilot 135 Op. While A does all of the flying he "teaches" B how to work those new avionics and explains flight procedures, most of which could be done far more effectively on the ground to begin with). B never touches the flight controls.

Are you asking how many hours of looking at the dials and the MFD's pretty display could B log as "instruction received" flight time before someone smells the BS?

 

[Superpilot92]

How about the MEI give the ME training for his ATP or even another MEI
?