Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

And now its Bush's fault?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

F9 Driver

Wear The Fox Hat
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Posts
515
http://www.ajc.com/business/content...ml/Financial/AP.V9714.AP-Airlines-Oil-Pr.html

U.S. Airlines Blame Bush for Cost of Oil
By BRAD FOSS
AP Business Writer


WASHINGTON (AP)--The U.S. airline industry accused the Bush administration Thursday of recklessly driving up the cost of oil by purchasing unncessarily large amounts of petroleum for the nation's strategic reserves at a time when prices are already high.

``The government is out buying fuel, it appears, without much regard for the impact that it is having on prices,'' said James C. May, the chief executive of the Air Transport Association, the industry's main lobbying group.

May, speaking to a group of reporters at the association's headquarters in Washington, said oil purchases made by the Energy Department were adding enough demand to the world marketplace to drive up the price of oil by more than $6 per barrel, a major concern for airlines since jet fuel is their second biggest expense after labor.

Industry analysts attribute the high price of oil to tight supplies, rising demand because of the improving economy and fears about international terrorism.

The Energy Department did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

Each dollar increase in the price of oil translates into an additional 2-3 cents per gallon for jet fuel, according to the ailrine trade group. In October, airlines paid an average of 82.6 cents per gallon for jet fuel, about the same amount they paid a year ago.

The February crude futures contract was trading Thursday morning at $33.60 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

May estimated that the impact of today's high oil prices on the airline industry was ``easily $2 billion,'' or an amount equivalent to nearly half the industry's total expected losses for 2003. He said the industry was in the process of crafting a formal complaint to the Bush administration about its fuel purchasing policies.

The Energy Department is in the process of filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, now at 638 million barrels, to its capacity of 700 million barrels.

Meantime, the nation's commercially available inventory of crude, which traders watch closely to gauge whether supplies are adequate, is 3 percent below last year's levels. For the week ending Jan. 2, commercial supplies stood at 269.0 million barrels, down from 277.5 million barrels a year earlier.

May does not oppose the policy of filling the reserve, but he said the government ``needs to be a little more careful about how it goes about buying fuel on the open market.''


AP-NY-01-08-04 1228EST
 
I gotta tell ya'll that the author of the article has his facts wrong, and so does James May.

Ok ya'll here's the skinny on what's going on with the US's Strategic Petroleum Reserves(SPR).

It is Administration policy to either have the SPR full, in the event we need it, or not to have it completely full. Obviously the current administration feels like it needs to be at capacity, 700 million barrels stored in Louisiana salt domes.

Here's where the author is dead wrong, and so is May.

The DOE does NOT buy oil on the open market to fill the SPR. What the DOE does is rather than sell oil from government owned property to oil companies who then in turn sell it to you at the pump, or fuel farm. Or, the DOE reroutes the oil to the SPR.

You may think the DOE is responsible for the price increase as there is less oil for the open market, thus driving up demand. However, this does not singificantly increase the price of oil. In fact it has rarely ever changed the price of oil.

So, what does drive the price of oil you ask? Here are the 3 areas where the price of oil are driven:

The Wall Street derivitive firms.

Cold Weather.

The Futures Markets, where worries over terrorism is the catalyst.

I know ya'll have seen Congressional investigations over how the oil companies are screwing us at the pump. Price fixing, etc. Ever hear what the results of those investigations are? Nothing. Why? Because the findings are always the same. The price of oil is most driven by the derivitive firms, which is perfectly normal and legal in a free market economy.

I now ya'll have read stories by "Aviation Experts" and said to yourselves, what is this guy taking about? He just said that the flaps on the tail fell off and the hot duperator was the cause of the accident.

Well, the guy who wrote the article I'm referring to knows as much about the oil bidness and the SPR as those so-called "Aviation Experts".

I will give the author credit for the one line in the article that decrys May's position. It's the part where he says the industry's analysts blame the high cost of oil on tight reserves, growing economy, and terrorism.

But, if you ask James C. May, a registered Democrat, it's the Bush Administration's fault.

Maybe I should bury my head in the sand, not educate myself, listen to the biased liberal media, and blame everything on Bush.

Nah...that would be freakin retarded.

Adios,

HC
 
Ok, SWA guy, where do you get your info that James C. May is a registered Democrat? Are you just assuming that or do you have a source?
 
"So, what does drive the price of oil you ask? Here are the 3 areas where the price of oil are driven:

The Wall Street derivitive firms.

Cold Weather.

The Futures Markets, where worries over terrorism is the catalyst."


Your auther forgot about the #1 item.

SUPPLY. yes it does matter.
 
lets see, Bush gives the Airlines BILLIONS and now some want to bite the hand that feeds them?
 
captain said:
read the book "Bushwacked"

this is not flamebait

Ah yes...Molly Ivins. Now there's an unbiased source! :rolleyes:
 
SWA GUY said:
.
Maybe I should bury my head in the sand, not educate myself, listen to the biased liberal media, and blame everything on Bush.

Nah...that would be freakin retarded.

Adios,

HC

You're right, you shouldn't do that. What you should do is bury your head in the sand, not educate yourself, listen to the biased conservative media, and blame everything on the Democrats.

I recommend FOX Network for your television viewing and Rush Limbaugh for your enroute words of wisdom.

We must be very selective in our choice of spin doctors lest we become infected with the incurable disease of lackatruth. Pilots are notably at risk.
 
FLB717 said:
lets see, Bush gives the Airlines BILLIONS and now some want to bite the hand that feeds them?

Gives the airlines BILLIONS?????? If your refering to tax relief post 911 and during the war, I thinking your distorting the facts. The government didnt GIVE the airlines any money, they just gave them a temporary tax relief. To my knoweledge, the US airlines are taxed much higher than any other airlines in the world.
 
Sorry, I should have stated it more clearly. The US Government has underwritten BILLIONS of dollar in loans to the struggling airlines using tax payer money. Pilots now get pay cuts while many Managment groups get a bonus for not loosing less money than they do.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top